Guangdong Shuangyang Plastic Packing Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Executive Summary

Guangdong Shuangyang Plastic Packing Products Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Guangdong, offering PET preforms and related plastic packaging products with listed MOQs ranging from 3,000 boxes to 10,000 pieces/sets. Based on the provided data, the company shows basic-to-moderate production capacity, supported by a 6,000+㎡ factory area, 30+ staff, and verified supplier status. Its platform credibility is relatively solid, with 2 years as a Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance support, and a 100.0% on-time delivery label. Business activity is moderate, with 40+ orders and CN¥67.6K+ transaction value in the past six months. Customer feedback is positive but limited in volume, with a 5.0 store rating based on 7 reviews. This supplier appears suitable for buyers seeking cost-sensitive PET preform or plastic packaging procurement with moderate order volumes, but larger enterprise buyers should further verify production scalability, customization capability, and quality inspection processes before placing high-volume orders.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis
- Factory area: 6,000+㎡
- Employees: 30+ staff
- Verified supplier: True
- Product scope: PET preforms and plastic packaging products

Elaboration
The supplier has a defined physical production base with over 6,000㎡ of factory area, which indicates a meaningful manufacturing footprint. However, the employee count of 30+ staff suggests the operation is not large-scale compared with major industrial packaging manufacturers. The verified supplier status provides some credibility regarding the existence and basic operating condition of the company.

Scoring Rationale
The company demonstrates stable basic production capability, but the workforce size limits confidence in large-scale or highly complex supply programs. The available data supports classification as a small-to-medium factory rather than a large-scale supply chain operator. Factory verification strengthens the assessment, but there is insufficient data on production lines, monthly capacity, equipment, or factory certifications.

Final Score
14 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier tenure: 2 years
- Trade Assurance: True
- Certification/industry labels: “Response time ≤3h”, “On-time delivery 100.0%”
- Verified supplier: True

Elaboration
The supplier has several core platform credibility indicators, including Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance support, and verified supplier status. These are useful platform-level trust signals for procurement risk control. However, the Gold Supplier history is relatively short at 2 years, and the provided certification labels mainly reflect service and delivery performance rather than broader compliance, factory management, or product certification systems.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier has a credible basic profile, but the compliance structure is not fully comprehensive based on the provided data. Trade Assurance and verification reduce transaction risk, while the short Gold Supplier duration and limited certification label depth prevent a higher score. No independent product certification, industry compliance certification, or detailed audit report information was provided.

Final Score
15 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis
- Past 6-month orders: 40+
- Past 6-month transaction value: CN¥67.6K+
- Store rating: 5.0
- Review count: 7

Elaboration
The supplier has demonstrated recent transaction activity, with more than 40 orders over the past six months. The transaction value of CN¥67.6K+ indicates active but not high-volume commercial performance. A 5.0 store rating is positive, but the review base of 7 is relatively small, limiting the statistical strength of customer validation.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier shows real marketplace activity and a positive rating profile, but the scale of transactions remains moderate. The combination of 40+ orders and CN¥67.6K+ transaction value suggests stable but not large-scale commercial traction. The low review count means the rating should be treated cautiously, as it does not yet represent broad customer feedback.

Final Score
14 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis
- Communication response time: ≤3h
- Full Customization: Insufficient Data

Elaboration
The supplier’s stated response time of within 3 hours indicates acceptable communication efficiency for standard sourcing inquiries. However, the data does not confirm whether the supplier supports Full Customization, private labeling, mold development, packaging customization, or technical design support.

Scoring Rationale
The response speed is reasonable but does not meet the strongest benchmark of response within 1 hour. Because customization capability is not provided, the supplier cannot be scored as a strong service-capability provider. The score reflects normal communication responsiveness with insufficient evidence of advanced buyer support or customization depth.

Final Score
7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis
- On-time delivery rate: 100.0%

Elaboration
The supplier’s reported on-time delivery rate is 100.0%, which is a strong delivery performance indicator. This suggests that, based on available platform data, completed orders have been shipped within expected timelines.

Scoring Rationale
According to the scoring standard, an on-time delivery rate above 90% qualifies for the highest score range. Since the provided figure is 100.0%, the supplier receives a full score for this dimension. However, the assessment is limited to the reported platform delivery data and does not include detailed lead time, logistics capacity, or peak-season fulfillment records.

Final Score
10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis
- Store rating: 5.0
- Review count: 7
- Verified supplier: True
- Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
- Factory Verification: True, based on verified supplier status

Elaboration
The supplier has a perfect store rating of 5.0, which is positive, but the number of reviews is limited. Verified supplier status provides some level of quality and operational credibility, but the provided data does not confirm Finished Product Inspection, formal quality control certifications, defect rate records, inspection procedures, or third-party quality audit results.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier deserves credit for positive customer feedback and verified supplier status. However, the small number of reviews reduces confidence in the consistency of quality performance across a broader customer base. Since Finished Product Inspection information is not provided, the quality assurance system cannot be considered fully verified.

Final Score
14 / 20

Total Score

74 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Cooperation is recommended with moderate caution. This supplier is suitable for buyers seeking PET preforms or plastic packaging products at moderate order volumes, especially where Trade Assurance and reliable delivery performance are important. The main risks are limited review volume, short Gold Supplier history, insufficient data on customization capability, and insufficient data on finished product inspection systems. Growth potential exists due to verified supplier status, 100.0% on-time delivery, and active recent transactions, but buyers should request production capacity details, QC procedures, sample validation, and customization confirmation before scaling orders.