Jinhua City Jindong Area Duoyou Crafts Factory Supplier Evaluation
Executive Summary
Jinhua City Jindong Area Duoyou Crafts Factory is a Zhejiang, China-based supplier focused on plastic and home decoration vase products, including floor-standing vases, tabletop vases, and decorative plastic vase styles. Based on the provided data, the company shows a moderate manufacturing base with a factory area of 7,200+㎡, 50+ staff, and verified supplier status. Its platform profile is relatively credible, supported by 6 years as a Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance, and listed operational tags such as 92.4% on-time delivery and response time within 2 hours. Business activity appears stable, with 200+ orders and CN¥270.4K+ transaction value in the past six months, supported by a 4.5 store rating and 70+ reviews. The supplier is suitable for buyers seeking low-MOQ decorative vase products, small-batch procurement, and cost-sensitive home decoration sourcing. Key limitations include insufficient data on customization capability, finished product inspection, and detailed factory audit standards.

Detailed Analysis
1. Company Strength
Basis
- Factory area: 7,200+㎡
- Employees: 50+ staff
- Verified supplier: True
- Location: Zhejiang, China
Elaboration
The supplier has a clearly stated production site size and staff base, indicating basic-to-moderate production capability. A 7,200+㎡ factory suggests the company is not a very small workshop, while 50+ employees indicates a manageable production team rather than a large-scale industrial operation. The verified supplier status adds credibility to the physical existence and basic operational profile of the company.
Scoring Rationale
The supplier demonstrates a stable manufacturing foundation with factory space, staff count, and verification support. However, the employee scale remains moderate, and there is no additional data on production lines, monthly capacity, equipment, or advanced factory certifications. Therefore, it fits best within the medium stable factory range rather than the large-scale supply chain category.
Final Score
16 / 20
2. Platform & Compliance Credibility
Basis
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier duration: 6 years
- Trade Assurance: True
- Certification / industry tags: “On-time delivery 92.4%”, “Response time ≤2h”
- Factory or supplier verification: True
Elaboration
The supplier has a solid platform credibility profile. Six years as a Gold Supplier indicates an established presence on , while Trade Assurance provides an additional transaction protection mechanism for buyers. The verified supplier status further supports platform-level credibility. However, the provided certification tags are operational performance labels rather than formal product, quality, or factory management certifications.
Scoring Rationale
The supplier has several core credibility indicators: Gold Supplier status, a six-year platform history, Trade Assurance, and verification. This is stronger than a basic supplier profile. However, the absence of detailed third-party factory audit reports, product compliance certificates, or quality management certifications prevents a top-tier score.
Final Score
17 / 20
3. Business Performance
Basis
- Orders in past 6 months: 200+
- Transaction value in past 6 months: CN¥270.4K+
- Store rating: 4.5
- Reviews: 70+
Elaboration
The supplier has measurable recent transaction activity, with more than 200 orders over six months. The transaction amount of CN¥270.4K+ indicates active commercial performance, although the average transaction scale appears moderate based on the available order and value data. A 4.5 rating with 70+ reviews provides some customer validation, but the review volume is not large enough to indicate very broad market acceptance.
Scoring Rationale
The business performance is stable and commercially validated, especially through recent orders and transaction value. However, the rating is good rather than exceptional, and the review count is moderate. The supplier performs above a low-activity seller but does not meet the threshold for high-volume, high-value, high-feedback performance.
Final Score
16 / 20
4. Service Capability
Basis
- Communication response time: ≤2h
- Full Customization: Insufficient Data
Elaboration
The supplier’s response time of within 2 hours indicates acceptable communication efficiency for online sourcing. This supports normal buyer inquiry handling and basic pre-sales communication. However, there is no provided evidence confirming Full Customization capability, design support, OEM/ODM service, packaging customization, or sample development process.
Scoring Rationale
The response speed is positive, but it does not reach the strongest service level defined as response within 1 hour combined with strong customization capability. Since customization data is missing, the supplier should be assessed as having normal service responsiveness but unverified customization strength.
Final Score
7 / 10
5. Delivery Performance
Basis
- On-time delivery rate: 92.4%
Elaboration
The supplier’s on-time delivery rate exceeds 90%, which is a positive indicator for shipment reliability. For procurement planning, this suggests the supplier has demonstrated relatively strong fulfillment discipline on the platform. The data does not include average lead time, production cycle, logistics method, or delay dispute history.
Scoring Rationale
According to the scoring standard, an on-time delivery rate above 90% qualifies for the 9–10 point range. Since the rate is 92.4%, the supplier deserves a strong delivery score. A perfect score is not assigned because the dataset does not include broader delivery performance details beyond the on-time percentage.
Final Score
9 / 10
6. Quality & Customer Feedback
Basis
- Store rating: 4.5
- Reviews: 70+
- Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
- Factory Verification: True
Elaboration
The supplier has a positive but not outstanding customer feedback profile. A 4.5 rating suggests generally satisfactory buyer experience, while 70+ reviews provide a moderate level of feedback evidence. Factory verification supports basic quality credibility at the supplier level. However, there is no provided information confirming Finished Product Inspection, formal QC processes, defect rate, product testing, or quality certifications.
Scoring Rationale
The supplier has reasonable customer feedback and verified supplier status, which supports a mid-to-good quality assessment. However, the review volume is not large, and the absence of Finished Product Inspection data limits confidence in systematic quality control. Therefore, the score should remain below the top quality tier.
Final Score
15 / 20
Total Score
80 / 100
Procurement Recommendation
Cooperation is recommended with controlled order scale and standard pre-shipment confirmation. This supplier is suitable for buyers sourcing plastic decorative vases, home decoration items, low-MOQ orders, and cost-sensitive product selections. Its main strengths are verified supplier status, 6-year Gold Supplier history, Trade Assurance, stable recent transactions, and strong on-time delivery performance.
Main risks include insufficient data on Full Customization, Finished Product Inspection, formal quality certifications, production capacity details, and advanced factory audit results. Buyers should request product samples, confirm packaging and material specifications, clarify QC procedures, and use Trade Assurance for initial orders. Growth potential appears moderate, supported by stable transaction activity and platform credibility, but further validation is required before large-volume or quality-sensitive procurement.
Leave your comment