Wujiang City Shenta Hengfeng Hardware And Plastic Products Factory Supplier Evaluation

Executive Summary

Wujiang City Shenta Hengfeng Hardware And Plastic Products Factory is a China-based supplier located in Jiangsu, with disclosed production resources including a factory area of over 20,000㎡ and more than 260 staff. Based on the provided product listings, the supplier appears focused on metal or portable saving/cash box related products, with MOQs mainly between 500 and 800 pieces and listed prices in RMB. The company shows strong platform credibility through 19 years as an Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance support, verified supplier status, and a 100.0% on-time delivery tag. Commercial performance shows some transaction validation, with 10+ orders and CN¥1.3M+ transaction value over the past six months, but customer feedback data is weak because no store rating is provided and review count is 0. This supplier is most suitable for buyers seeking an established manufacturing base with verified platform credentials and stable delivery indicators, while buyers requiring strong public review evidence or detailed quality inspection records should conduct additional due diligence.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis
- Factory area: 20,000+㎡
- Employee count: 260+ staff
- Verified supplier: True
- Location: Jiangsu, China

Elaboration
The supplier discloses a relatively substantial factory footprint and workforce size. A production site exceeding 20,000㎡ and more than 260 employees indicate a meaningful manufacturing base rather than a small trading-only operation. The verified supplier status further supports the credibility of the disclosed factory profile, although the provided data does not specify detailed production lines, annual capacity, machinery count, or audit report contents.

Scoring Rationale
The factory size and employee base place the company in a strong manufacturing category. The verified supplier status adds confidence to the physical production profile. However, because no detailed production capacity, equipment list, factory audit certificate, or operational scale metrics are provided, the score should remain slightly below the highest range.

Final Score: 18 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier tenure: 19 years
- Trade Assurance: True
- Certification / industry tags: “Response time ≤9h”, “On-time delivery 100.0%”
- Verified supplier: True

Elaboration
The supplier has a long platform history, with 19 years as a Gold Supplier. This is a strong indicator of platform continuity and supplier presence. Trade Assurance support provides an additional transaction protection mechanism for buyers. The verified supplier status also strengthens platform credibility. However, the provided certification or industry tags mainly relate to response time and delivery performance rather than independent product, management system, or factory compliance certifications.

Scoring Rationale
The combination of 19-year Gold Supplier tenure, Trade Assurance, and verified supplier status represents a strong platform credibility profile. The only limitation is that no specific third-party product certifications, quality management certifications, or detailed compliance certificates are provided in the dataset. Therefore, the supplier merits a high score, but not a perfect one.

Final Score: 19 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis
- Orders over past 6 months: 10+
- Transaction value over past 6 months: CN¥1.3M+
- Store rating: Insufficient Data
- Review count: 0

Elaboration
The supplier has recorded transaction activity in the past six months, with more than 10 orders and a transaction value exceeding CN¥1.3M. The transaction amount suggests that at least some orders may be of meaningful value. However, the order count is not high, and the absence of a store rating limits visibility into buyer satisfaction. The review count of 0 also weakens the public commercial validation available from customer-side feedback.

Scoring Rationale
CN¥1.3M+ in six-month transaction value provides a reasonable commercial signal, but 10+ orders is only a moderate-to-low order volume. Since no rating is provided and there are no reviews, the supplier lacks strong customer feedback validation. This supports a middle score rather than a high-performance score.

Final Score: 13 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis
- Communication response time: ≤9h
- Full Customization: Insufficient Data

Elaboration
The supplier’s disclosed response time is within nine hours, which indicates a basic level of responsiveness but does not meet the strongest service benchmark of response within one hour. The provided data does not state whether the supplier supports Full Customization, OEM, ODM, sample development, packaging customization, or design modification services.

Scoring Rationale
A response time of ≤9h is acceptable for routine communication, but the lack of disclosed Full Customization capability prevents assigning a high score. The supplier demonstrates basic service responsiveness but not strong customization or rapid-response capability based on the available data.

Final Score: 6 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis
- On-time delivery rate: 100.0%

Elaboration
The supplier’s disclosed on-time delivery rate is 100.0%, which is the strongest delivery indicator available in the provided dataset. This suggests that, for recorded platform transactions reflected in the data, orders were shipped on time. However, no shipment volume, sample size, delivery regions, lead times, or logistics performance details are provided.

Scoring Rationale
According to the scoring standard, an on-time delivery rate above 90% qualifies for 9–10 points. A 100.0% rate supports the maximum delivery score, although the lack of supporting shipment volume data should be noted as a contextual limitation rather than a reason for major deduction.

Final Score: 10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis
- Store rating: Insufficient Data
- Review count: 0
- Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
- Factory Verification / verified supplier: True

Elaboration
The supplier benefits from verified supplier status, which provides some confidence in the company profile. However, the quality and customer feedback evidence is limited. No store rating is provided, review count is 0, and there is no disclosed Finished Product Inspection information. The dataset also does not include product defect rates, inspection reports, return rates, customer complaint data, or quality certifications.

Scoring Rationale
Because customer feedback is absent and no finished product inspection system is disclosed, the supplier cannot be considered strongly validated from a quality feedback perspective. Verified supplier status provides a basic credibility layer, but it does not replace customer reviews or documented inspection controls. Therefore, the score should remain in the lower-middle range.

Final Score: 10 / 20

Total Score

Total Score: 76 / 100

• Company Strength: 18 / 20
• Platform & Compliance Credibility: 19 / 20
• Business Performance: 13 / 20
• Service Capability: 6 / 10
• Delivery Performance: 10 / 10
• Quality & Customer Feedback: 10 / 20

Procurement Recommendation

Cooperation is recommended with controlled due diligence. This supplier is suitable for buyers seeking an established China-based factory with a sizable workforce, large factory area, long operating history, Trade Assurance support, and strong disclosed delivery performance. It may fit importers, wholesalers, and distributors purchasing money-saving boxes or related metal cash box products at MOQs of 500–800 pieces.

The main risks are insufficient customer feedback evidence, no disclosed store rating, 0 reviews, and lack of provided Finished Product Inspection or detailed quality certification data. Before bulk procurement, buyers should request product samples, inspection reports, production photos or audit documents, and written confirmation of customization capabilities if needed. The supplier’s growth potential is supported by its long platform history, verified factory profile, and CN¥1.3M+ recent transaction value, but stronger review accumulation and clearer quality documentation would improve sourcing confidence.