Ningbo Style Plastic Factory Supplier Evaluation

Executive Summary

Ningbo Style Plastic Factory is a China-based supplier located in Zhejiang, with a reported factory area of 500+㎡ and 10+ staff. Based on the provided data, it appears to be a small-scale manufacturer with basic production capability and verified supplier status. Its product range is concentrated in plastic pest-control, insect-viewing, and garden-related plastic items, with MOQs ranging from 10 pieces to 5,000 boxes depending on product type. The supplier has strong platform credibility, supported by 17 years as an Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance availability, and a 100.0% on-time delivery record. However, its recent business performance is moderate to limited, with 20+ orders and CN¥67.6K+ transaction value in the past six months. Customer feedback is also limited, with a 4.6 store rating based on only 5 reviews. This supplier may be suitable for buyers seeking low-to-medium volume plastic products from an experienced supplier, but quality consistency and customization capability require further verification.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis
- Factory area: 500+㎡
- Employees: 10+ staff
- Verified supplier: True
- Location: Zhejiang, China

Elaboration
The supplier has a defined physical factory presence and a small employee base. The factory area of 500+㎡ and 10+ staff indicate a relatively small manufacturing operation rather than a large-scale industrial supplier. The verified supplier status provides some support for its operational legitimacy, but the available data does not show advanced factory certifications, large production lines, or detailed capacity metrics.

Scoring Rationale
The company demonstrates basic manufacturing capability and has some verification support, but its small factory size and limited workforce restrict its score. It does not qualify as a medium or large-scale stable supply chain based on the provided data. The score reflects a small but operational supplier with foundational production capacity.

Final Score: 12 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier tenure: 17 years
- Trade Assurance: True
- Certification/industry tags: “Response time ≤8h”, “On-time delivery 100.0%”
- Verified supplier: True

Elaboration
The supplier has a strong platform history, with 17 years as a Gold Supplier. Trade Assurance is available, which improves transactional security for buyers. The verified supplier status further supports platform credibility. However, the provided certification or industry tags mainly relate to service and delivery performance rather than independent product, factory, or compliance certifications.

Scoring Rationale
The long Gold Supplier tenure, Trade Assurance support, and supplier verification create a strong credibility profile. The score is not maximized because there is insufficient data on third-party product certifications, compliance certificates, or detailed factory audit documentation beyond the verified supplier status.

Final Score: 18 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis
- Past 6-month orders: 20+
- Past 6-month transaction value: CN¥67.6K+
- Store rating: 4.6
- Reviews: 5

Elaboration
The supplier has recent transaction activity, but the order count and transaction value suggest a relatively modest commercial scale. A 4.6 rating is positive, but the review base is very small, limiting the reliability of customer feedback as a performance indicator. The business data confirms active sales, but not high-volume or high-value market validation.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier shows measurable transaction history, which is better than having no commercial proof. However, 20+ orders and CN¥67.6K+ over six months represent limited-to-moderate business activity. The low number of reviews reduces confidence in the rating. Therefore, the supplier fits the lower end of stable but small-scale business performance.

Final Score: 13 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis
- Communication response time: ≤8h
- Full Customization: Insufficient Data

Elaboration
The supplier’s response time of ≤8 hours indicates acceptable communication efficiency, but it does not meet the highest service benchmark of response within one hour. There is no provided evidence that the supplier supports Full Customization, design development, OEM/ODM service, packaging customization, or dedicated account support.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier demonstrates normal responsiveness, but the lack of customization data limits the assessment. Since strong customization capability is not confirmed, the score remains in the basic-to-moderate service range.

Final Score: 6 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis
- On-time delivery rate: 100.0%

Elaboration
The supplier reports a 100.0% on-time delivery rate, which is a strong delivery indicator. Based on the scoring standard, any supplier above 90% qualifies for the highest delivery performance range. No negative delivery data is provided.

Scoring Rationale
A 100.0% on-time delivery rate directly supports a top-tier delivery score. While shipment volume behind this rate is not fully detailed, the provided metric itself is excellent and meets the highest scoring threshold.

Final Score: 10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis
- Store rating: 4.6
- Reviews: 5
- Verified supplier: True
- Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
- Factory Verification: True / verified supplier status provided

Elaboration
The supplier has a positive store rating of 4.6, but only 5 reviews are available, which makes the feedback sample limited. Verified supplier status provides some quality and operational credibility, but there is no provided evidence of Finished Product Inspection, product testing, quality certifications, or detailed quality-control procedures.

Scoring Rationale
The rating is favorable, but the low review count limits confidence in long-term quality consistency. The verified supplier status supports basic credibility, but the absence of Finished Product Inspection data prevents a higher score. The supplier shows acceptable but not strongly proven quality assurance.

Final Score: 13 / 20

Total Score

Total Score: 72 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Cooperation is conditionally recommended for buyers seeking small-to-medium volume plastic pest-control, garden, or insect-related products from an experienced supplier with strong platform credibility and excellent reported delivery performance. The supplier is most suitable for buyers who prioritize transaction security, long supplier tenure, and flexible MOQ options across listed products.

Key risks include small factory scale, limited employee count, low review volume, modest recent transaction value, and insufficient data on Full Customization, Finished Product Inspection, product certifications, and detailed quality-control systems. Growth potential exists due to the supplier’s 17-year Gold Supplier history, Trade Assurance support, verified status, and 100.0% on-time delivery rate. Before placing large or customized orders, buyers should request product samples, quality inspection details, customization capability confirmation, and updated factory or inspection documentation.