Ningbo Keshicheng Plastic Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Executive Summary

Ningbo Keshicheng Plastic Products Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Zhejiang, with a reported factory area of 10,000+ m² and 60+ staff. The company appears to have a basic-to-medium manufacturing foundation, supported by verified supplier status and platform-backed trade mechanisms such as Gold Supplier membership and Trade Assurance. Its listed products are ABS plastic items with relatively low unit prices and a minimum order quantity of 2,000 pieces, suggesting suitability for buyers seeking cost-sensitive plastic component sourcing.

However, the supplier’s commercial track record on the platform is still very limited, with only 2 orders and CN¥338+ transaction value in the past six months. Store rating is unavailable and review count is 0, which weakens buyer confidence from a market validation perspective. The supplier shows positive delivery data with 100.0% on-time delivery and has Finished Product Inspection listed, but customer feedback remains insufficient. Overall, this supplier may be suitable for trial orders, price-driven sourcing, or early-stage supplier development rather than high-risk or large-volume procurement without further verification.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis

• Factory location: Zhejiang, China
• Factory area: 10,000+ m²
• Employee count: 60+ staff
• Verified supplier: True

Elaboration

The supplier reports a factory area exceeding 10,000 m², which indicates a meaningful physical production base. The workforce size of 60+ staff suggests that the company has operational capacity beyond a very small workshop, but it does not indicate a large-scale labor force. Verified supplier status provides additional credibility that the company has undergone some form of supplier verification.

Scoring Rationale

The factory area is relatively strong, while the employee count points to a moderate-sized operation rather than a large-scale industrial supplier. The presence of verified supplier status supports confidence in the company’s basic production legitimacy. However, the available data does not include detailed production lines, annual capacity, machinery list, export volume, or factory audit depth, so the company should be assessed as a medium-scale supplier with reasonable but not fully proven production strength.

Final Score

16 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis

• Gold Supplier: True
• Gold Supplier tenure: 1 year
• Trade Assurance: True
• Certification / platform labels: Finished product inspection, ODM service available, Response time ≤3h, On-time delivery 100.0%
• Verified supplier: True

Elaboration

The supplier has several important platform credibility indicators, including Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance support, and verified supplier information. The listed platform labels also show operational and service-related credentials, including inspection and delivery performance tags. However, the Gold Supplier history is only 1 year, which means the supplier has limited long-term platform credibility compared with suppliers that have maintained verified platform status for many years.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier meets several core credibility requirements: Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance, verification, and relevant platform labels. These are positive indicators for procurement risk control. The main limitation is the short Gold Supplier tenure, which reduces confidence in long-term platform performance and historical reliability. Therefore, the supplier demonstrates a credible but still relatively early-stage platform profile.

Final Score

16 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis

• Orders in the past six months: 2
• Transaction value in the past six months: CN¥338+
• Store rating: Insufficient Data
• Review count: 0

Elaboration

The supplier’s recent transaction data is very limited. Only 2 orders and CN¥338+ in transaction value over the past six months indicate low platform sales activity. In addition, there is no available store rating and no customer reviews, which means buyer satisfaction and repeat purchasing behavior cannot be validated from the provided data.

Scoring Rationale

Business performance is the weakest area in this assessment. Although the supplier has some transaction activity, the order count and transaction value are too low to demonstrate stable commercial performance. The absence of rating data and customer reviews further limits confidence. This does not necessarily indicate poor capability, but it does mean the supplier lacks sufficient market-proven evidence on the platform.

Final Score

8 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis

• Communication response time: ≤3h
• ODM service available: listed in platform labels
• Full Customization: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier’s response time of ≤3 hours indicates acceptable communication efficiency. ODM service availability suggests the supplier may support some level of design or specification-based cooperation. However, there is no provided evidence confirming Full Customization capability, dedicated engineering support, multilingual service, sample lead time, or project management process.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier demonstrates a reasonable service baseline through response time and ODM service availability. However, the response time is not within the strongest ≤1 hour category, and Full Customization is not confirmed. Therefore, the service capability is suitable for standard inquiries and potentially basic customization, but not yet proven for complex customized procurement projects.

Final Score

7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis

• On-time delivery rate: 100.0%

Elaboration

The supplier reports a 100.0% on-time delivery rate, which is a strong delivery indicator. Based on the scoring standard, a delivery rate above 90% qualifies for the highest scoring range. However, the reliability of this metric should be interpreted together with the low recent order volume, because only 2 orders were reported in the past six months.

Scoring Rationale

The available delivery percentage is excellent and meets the highest delivery performance threshold. The only caution is that the order base appears limited, so the delivery performance has not been validated across a large number of transactions. Still, based strictly on the provided data, the supplier deserves a high delivery score.

Final Score

10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis

• Finished Product Inspection: listed
• Verified supplier: True
• Store rating: Insufficient Data
• Review count: 0
• Factory Verification: Insufficient Data beyond verified supplier status

Elaboration

The supplier has Finished Product Inspection listed, which is a positive quality-control indicator. Verified supplier status also adds some confidence in supplier legitimacy. However, there is no store rating and no customer reviews, so actual buyer satisfaction, complaint history, product consistency, and after-sales performance cannot be evaluated from the provided information.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has some quality assurance signals, especially Finished Product Inspection and verified supplier status. However, the complete lack of customer reviews and unavailable store rating significantly limit quality validation from a buyer feedback perspective. The supplier should therefore be considered as having basic quality-control credibility, but insufficient customer feedback evidence.

Final Score

12 / 20

Total Score

69 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Ningbo Keshicheng Plastic Products Co., Ltd. can be considered for cautious cooperation, especially for buyers seeking low-cost ABS plastic products, trial sourcing, or supplier development opportunities. The supplier has a reasonable factory base, verified supplier status, Trade Assurance support, Finished Product Inspection, and strong reported on-time delivery.

However, it is not yet recommended for immediate large-volume or high-risk procurement without additional verification. The main risks are limited recent transaction volume, very low disclosed transaction value, no store rating, and 0 customer reviews. These gaps make it difficult to confirm commercial reliability, product consistency, and customer satisfaction.

Recommended cooperation approach: - Start with a sample order or small trial order. - Use Trade Assurance for payment and delivery protection. - Request product specifications, inspection standards, and production photos before ordering. - Confirm whether Full Customization is available if customized products are required. - Conduct additional factory or third-party inspection before scaling order volume.

Overall, the supplier shows moderate operational potential but currently has insufficient platform transaction evidence. Its growth potential depends on whether it can build stronger customer feedback, increase order volume, and provide more transparent quality and production documentation.