Jiaxing Haobo Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Executive Summary

Jiaxing Haobo Garment Co., Ltd. is a China-based garment supplier located in Zhejiang, with a stated factory area of 1,000+ sqm and 30+ staff. The company appears positioned as a small-scale apparel manufacturer focusing on women’s fashion tops and related garments, including blouses, printed long-sleeve styles, silky tops, and satin bodysuits, with MOQ levels generally at 300 pieces or units. The supplier is listed as a Gold Supplier for 1 year and is marked as a verified supplier, but Trade Assurance is not supported based on the provided data. Commercial performance visibility is weak because past six-month order volume, transaction value, store rating, and customer reviews are either missing or zero. Delivery data is strong with a stated 100.0% on-time delivery rate, while service response is listed as within 10 hours. This supplier may be suitable for buyers seeking small-batch women’s apparel sourcing with basic factory verification, but it requires further due diligence before larger-scale procurement.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis
- Factory location: Zhejiang, China
- Factory area: 1,000+ sqm
- Staff size: 30+ staff
- Verified supplier: True

Elaboration
The supplier has a defined physical factory scale and workforce, which indicates basic in-house production capability. A 1,000+ sqm facility with 30+ staff suggests a small manufacturing operation rather than a large-scale industrial supplier. The verified supplier status provides some platform-level confirmation of company existence or factory-related information, although no detailed factory audit report, production line count, monthly capacity, or machinery list is provided.

Scoring Rationale
The company demonstrates basic production capability and has some verification support, but the available scale indicators are modest. The factory size and employee count are more consistent with a small manufacturer than a large or mid-sized supplier. Because there is no data on production capacity, equipment, audit grade, or export volume, the company cannot be scored as a strong large-scale supplier.

Final Score
12 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier tenure: 1 year
- Trade Assurance: False
- Certification / industry tags: “Response time ≤10h”, “On-time delivery 100.0%”
- Verified supplier: True

Elaboration
The supplier has basic platform credibility through Gold Supplier status and verified supplier status. However, the Gold Supplier history is short at only 1 year, which limits the strength of long-term platform credibility. Trade Assurance is not supported, reducing buyer protection and transaction security. The listed tags relate to response time and delivery performance rather than broader compliance certifications or product quality certifications.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier has some platform credibility but does not show a complete compliance framework. The absence of Trade Assurance is a meaningful limitation for procurement risk control. The short Gold Supplier tenure also means the supplier has not yet built a long platform track record. Verification status helps, but the certification profile remains incomplete.

Final Score
12 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis
- Past 6-month order volume: Insufficient Data
- Past 6-month transaction value: Insufficient Data
- Store rating: Insufficient Data
- Review count: 0

Elaboration
Commercial performance data is largely unavailable. There is no stated order volume, no disclosed transaction amount, no store rating, and zero customer reviews. This makes it difficult to validate the supplier’s actual sales activity, repeat buyer confidence, or market acceptance on the platform. The product listings show clear pricing and MOQ information, but listing availability alone does not prove transaction performance.

Scoring Rationale
Because order history, transaction value, and customer satisfaction indicators are missing or absent, the supplier has weak commercial validation. A zero review count is a significant limitation when assessing buyer experience and market reliability. The score is therefore placed below the basic commercial validation range.

Final Score
6 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis
- Communication response time: ≤10h
- Full Customization support: Insufficient Data
- Communication efficiency beyond response time: Insufficient Data

Elaboration
The supplier’s response time is listed as within 10 hours, which indicates acceptable but not premium responsiveness. There is no provided evidence that the supplier supports Full Customization, OEM/ODM development, private labeling, sample development, or technical design communication. As a result, service capability can only be assessed on the limited response-time indicator.

Scoring Rationale
A response time of ≤10 hours is reasonable for basic supplier communication, but it does not meet the strongest service benchmark of response within 1 hour. Since customization capability is not confirmed, the supplier cannot be rated highly in service capability. The score reflects basic responsiveness with insufficient evidence of advanced buyer support.

Final Score
6 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis
- On-time delivery rate: 100.0%

Elaboration
The supplier reports a 100.0% on-time delivery rate, which is a strong delivery indicator. Based on the scoring framework, any on-time delivery rate above 90% qualifies for the highest scoring band. However, the supporting context is limited because the number of orders behind this delivery rate is not provided.

Scoring Rationale
The stated delivery performance meets the top scoring threshold. The score is strong because the reported rate is 100.0%, but procurement teams should still verify the sample size or order base behind this figure, especially because transaction volume data is missing.

Final Score
10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis
- Store rating: Insufficient Data
- Review count: 0
- Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
- Factory Verification / verified supplier: True

Elaboration
The supplier has verified supplier status, which provides some basic credibility, but quality-related evidence is limited. There is no store rating, no customer review base, and no stated Finished Product Inspection capability. The lack of customer feedback prevents meaningful assessment of product consistency, complaint history, defect rate, or buyer satisfaction.

Scoring Rationale
Quality assurance visibility is weak. Factory verification provides some support, but it is not enough to offset the absence of ratings, reviews, and inspection information. Because customer feedback is unavailable and review count is zero, this dimension must be scored conservatively.

Final Score
8 / 20

Total Score

54 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Jiaxing Haobo Garment Co., Ltd. can be considered for cautious, small-scale sourcing of women’s apparel products where the buyer can conduct additional verification before purchase. The supplier has basic factory scale, verified supplier status, clear product listings, and strong stated delivery performance. However, it is not recommended for immediate large-volume or high-risk procurement without further checks.

Suitable customer types include small fashion retailers, boutique apparel buyers, online sellers, and buyers testing limited women’s blouse or fashion top assortments with MOQ around 300 pieces. The main risks are weak commercial validation, no available recent transaction data, zero reviews, no store rating, no Trade Assurance, and insufficient quality inspection information. Growth potential exists if the supplier improves platform transaction history, gains verified customer reviews, adds quality inspection transparency, and strengthens buyer protection mechanisms.