Jiaxing Shuchang Office Supplies Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Executive Summary

Jiaxing Shuchang Office Supplies Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Zhejiang, with a reported factory area of 8,900+㎡ and 60+ staff. Based on the provided data, the company appears to be a medium-sized office equipment and office supplies manufacturer/supplier, offering products such as A4 paper trimmers, binding machines, laminator machines, paper cutting machines, and related office-use equipment. The supplier has Gold Supplier status for 3 years, supports Trade Assurance, and is marked as a verified supplier, which provides a moderate level of platform credibility. Its recent business activity is relatively solid, with 300+ orders and CN¥338K+ transaction value over the past six months, supported by a 4.5 store rating and 50+ reviews. The supplier is suitable for small to mid-sized buyers, distributors, and procurement teams seeking low-MOQ office equipment with acceptable transaction history and delivery performance. Key limitations include insufficient data on customization capability and finished product inspection systems.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength — 20 Points

Basis

• Company name: Jiaxing Shuchang Office Supplies Co., Ltd.
• Location: Zhejiang, China
• Factory area: 8,900+㎡
• Employees: 60+ staff
• Verified supplier: True

Elaboration

The supplier has a stated factory area of more than 8,900㎡, which indicates a meaningful physical production or operational footprint. The employee count of 60+ staff suggests that the company is not a very small trading operation and likely has a basic organizational structure to support manufacturing, order handling, and operational management. The verified supplier status further supports the existence and credibility of the company’s operational base.

However, the available data does not include detailed production capacity, annual output, number of production lines, equipment list, factory audit reports, or specific factory certifications. Therefore, while the company shows signs of being a stable medium-sized supplier, the depth of production capability cannot be fully confirmed from the provided information alone.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier demonstrates stronger-than-basic company strength due to its 8,900+㎡ facility, 60+ employees, and verified supplier status. These indicators support a medium-scale operational profile rather than a small or weak-capacity supplier. However, the absence of detailed production capacity data, formal factory audit information, and manufacturing certification details prevents it from being rated as a large-scale, highly mature supply chain provider.

Final Score

16 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility — 20 Points

Basis

• Gold Supplier: True
• Gold Supplier duration: 3 years
• Trade Assurance: True
• Verified supplier: True
• Certification / platform tags:
• Response time ≤2h
• On-time delivery 93.4%

Elaboration

The supplier has been an Gold Supplier for 3 years and supports Trade Assurance, both of which are important indicators for platform-based sourcing credibility. Trade Assurance provides buyers with a transaction protection mechanism, while Gold Supplier status reflects a paid and maintained platform presence. The verified supplier status also adds credibility to the company profile.

That said, the Gold Supplier history is moderate rather than long-term. The provided certification or industry tag information mainly relates to response time and delivery performance rather than technical certifications, product compliance certifications, factory audit certifications, or quality system certifications. No specific ISO, CE, RoHS, SGS, or other compliance documentation is provided in the data. Therefore, platform credibility is acceptable, but compliance depth remains only partially supported.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has the core platform credibility elements: Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance support, and verified supplier status. These make it more credible than a supplier with limited platform backing. However, with only 3 years of Gold Supplier history and no provided product or factory compliance certificates, the supplier should not be rated at the highest level. The credibility is solid but not fully comprehensive.

Final Score

16 / 20

3. Business Performance — 20 Points

Basis

• Orders in the past 6 months: 300+
• Transaction amount in the past 6 months: CN¥338K+
• Store rating: 4.5
• Reviews: 50+

Elaboration

The supplier shows active commercial performance on the platform. More than 300 orders in the past six months indicates a relatively steady order flow. The transaction value of CN¥338K+ demonstrates measurable market activity, though it is not exceptionally large in value terms. The store rating of 4.5 is generally positive, and 50+ reviews provide some level of customer feedback validation.

The business performance appears suitable for buyers looking for suppliers with proven recent platform activity. However, the available transaction value suggests a moderate commercial scale rather than a high-volume enterprise supplier. The review count is useful but not large enough to be considered a highly extensive customer feedback base.

Scoring Rationale

The combination of 300+ recent orders, CN¥338K+ transaction value, 4.5 rating, and 50+ reviews supports a stable mid-level business profile. The supplier has enough transaction activity to show that it is commercially active and has handled multiple buyers. However, the transaction value and review volume do not justify a top-tier score, as the scale is moderate rather than high.

Final Score

16 / 20

4. Service Capability — 10 Points

Basis

• Communication response time: ≤2h
• Platform tag: Response time ≤2h
• Full Customization: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier’s response time of ≤2 hours indicates acceptable communication efficiency for platform-based procurement. This is a positive factor for buyers requiring quotation follow-up, order clarification, and basic pre-sales communication. A response time within two hours is commercially practical and suggests that the supplier has some level of sales or customer service support.

However, there is no provided information confirming Full Customization capability, OEM/ODM service, logo customization, packaging customization, engineering support, sample development, or custom specification handling. As a result, the supplier’s service capability can only be evaluated based on response speed, not on broader customization or project support ability.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier performs well in response efficiency, but the lack of confirmed customization capability limits the score. Since the data only confirms ≤2h response time and does not verify Full Customization or advanced service support, the supplier fits a normal service-capability profile rather than a strong customization-oriented supplier.

Final Score

7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance — 10 Points

Basis

• On-time delivery rate: 93.4%

Elaboration

The supplier’s on-time delivery rate of 93.4% is a positive indicator. According to the scoring standard, suppliers with an on-time delivery rate above 90% fall into the 9–10 point range. This suggests that the supplier has relatively stable order fulfillment performance and is capable of meeting delivery commitments in most cases.

A 93.4% rate is strong, though not perfect. It indicates that late deliveries may still occur, but the overall performance is above the acceptable threshold for most procurement scenarios.

Scoring Rationale

The on-time delivery rate exceeds 90%, qualifying the supplier for a high score in this dimension. Since the figure is 93.4%, it reflects reliable delivery execution, but not enough to assign a perfect score. The supplier demonstrates strong delivery consistency based on the provided data.

Final Score

9 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback — 20 Points

Basis

• Store rating: 4.5
• Reviews: 50+
• Verified supplier: True
• Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
• Factory Verification: Verified supplier status provided, but detailed factory verification report is Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier has a 4.5 store rating and more than 50 customer reviews, which indicates generally positive customer feedback. The rating is acceptable and suggests that buyers have had a reasonably satisfactory experience. The verified supplier status provides an additional layer of credibility regarding the supplier’s profile.

However, the data does not include information about Finished Product Inspection, formal quality control procedures, inspection reports, defect rates, product certifications, or detailed factory verification documentation. Therefore, while the supplier has some customer feedback support, the quality assurance system cannot be fully assessed. For buyers with strict quality requirements, additional verification would be necessary before large-scale procurement.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier deserves a mid-to-good score because of its 4.5 rating, 50+ reviews, and verified supplier status. These are useful indicators of customer satisfaction and supplier legitimacy. However, the lack of provided Finished Product Inspection data and detailed quality assurance documentation prevents a higher score. The supplier shows acceptable market feedback but incomplete quality system transparency.

Final Score

15 / 20

Total Score

Procurement Recommendation

Recommendation: Recommended for conditional cooperation.

Jiaxing Shuchang Office Supplies Co., Ltd. is suitable for buyers seeking office equipment and office supplies with low MOQ options, moderate supplier scale, verified platform presence, and stable recent transaction activity. The supplier is particularly suitable for small to mid-sized importers, online sellers, office supply distributors, and buyers conducting trial orders or moderate-volume procurement.

The main strengths are its 8,900+㎡ factory area, 60+ staff, verified supplier status, Trade Assurance support, 300+ recent orders, and strong 93.4% on-time delivery rate. These factors indicate a supplier with reasonable operational and commercial reliability.

Key risks include Insufficient Data regarding Full Customization capability, Finished Product Inspection, detailed factory audit reports, product compliance certifications, and formal quality control systems. Buyers with strict regulatory, branding, or technical quality requirements should request additional documentation before placing bulk orders.

Overall, the supplier has good growth potential as a medium-sized platform supplier with stable delivery and transaction performance, but quality system transparency and customization capability should be further verified before deeper strategic cooperation.