Hangzhou Fuyang Baka Plastic Packaging Factory Supplier Evaluation
Executive Summary
Hangzhou Fuyang Baka Plastic Packaging Factory is a China-based supplier located in Zhejiang, with a reported factory area of 1,600+ m² and 20+ staff. Based on the provided data, the company appears to be a small-scale but established manufacturer/trading supplier for household washing and cleaning-related plastic products, including washing machine cleaning discs, filter mesh bags, washing balls, and PVC drying/cleaning balls. Its strongest advantages are platform credibility and business validation: the supplier has 18 years as an Gold Supplier, supports Trade Assurance, is marked as a verified supplier, and has recorded 800+ orders with CN¥1.4M+ transaction value in the past six months. Customer feedback is also positive, with a 4.8 store rating and 100+ reviews. Delivery performance is strong, with a 93.7% on-time delivery rate. However, factory scale is limited, response time is moderate at ≤9 hours, and there is insufficient data on customization capability and finished product inspection systems.

Detailed Analysis
1. Company Strength
Basis
- Factory area: 1,600+ m²
- Staff count: 20+ staff
- Verified supplier: True
- Factory location: Zhejiang, China
Elaboration
The supplier has a defined factory footprint and workforce, indicating basic production capability. A 1,600+ m² facility with 20+ staff suggests a relatively small manufacturing operation rather than a large-scale industrial supplier. The verified supplier status strengthens confidence that the company has undergone some form of platform or supplier verification.
Scoring Rationale
The company demonstrates foundational manufacturing capacity and verified supplier status, but the scale is limited in both factory area and employee count. It is not positioned as a large-scale supplier based on the available data. The verification helps reduce supplier risk, but the production scale supports a small-to-medium capability assessment rather than a high-capacity supply chain rating.
Final Score
12 / 20
2. Platform & Compliance Credibility
Basis
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier duration: 18 years
- Trade Assurance: True
- Verification: Verified supplier marked as True
- Certification/industry tags: “Response time ≤9h”, “On-time delivery 93.7%”
Elaboration
The supplier shows strong platform credibility through long-term Gold Supplier status and Trade Assurance support. An 18-year Gold Supplier record is a significant indicator of platform continuity. The verified supplier status further supports credibility. However, the provided certification or industry tags mainly relate to service and delivery performance, not formal product, factory, or quality management certifications.
Scoring Rationale
The supplier performs strongly in platform-based trust indicators, especially due to its long Gold Supplier history, Trade Assurance availability, and verified supplier status. The main limitation is the absence of detailed third-party factory audit certificates, product compliance certificates, or quality system certifications in the provided data. Therefore, the score is high but not perfect.
Final Score
18 / 20
3. Business Performance
Basis
- Orders in past 6 months: 800+
- Transaction value in past 6 months: CN¥1.4M+
- Store rating: 4.8
- Reviews: 100+
Elaboration
The supplier has clear recent transaction activity, with more than 800 orders and over CN¥1.4M in transaction value during the past six months. This indicates active marketplace demand and a measurable commercial track record. The 4.8 rating and 100+ reviews also suggest that buyers have generally had positive purchasing experiences.
Scoring Rationale
The order volume is strong, and the transaction value provides meaningful commercial validation. The rating is high, and the review base is sufficient to support a reliable assessment, though not exceptionally large. Overall, the supplier shows stable and proven business performance, suitable for buyers seeking an already active supplier rather than an untested vendor.
Final Score
18 / 20
4. Service Capability
Basis
- Response time: ≤9 hours
- Full Customization: Insufficient Data
- Communication efficiency: partially indicated by response time only
Elaboration
The supplier provides a response time of ≤9 hours, which is acceptable but not highly responsive compared with suppliers responding within one hour. There is no provided evidence confirming Full Customization capability, design support, OEM/ODM services, sample development, or dedicated account management.
Scoring Rationale
The response time demonstrates a basic level of communication availability, but it does not reach the strongest service-performance tier. Since customization capability is not provided, this dimension cannot be rated as strong. The score reflects acceptable baseline service capability with missing data on deeper customization or buyer support functions.
Final Score
6 / 10
5. Delivery Performance
Basis
- On-time delivery rate: 93.7%
Elaboration
The supplier’s on-time delivery rate is above 90%, which indicates strong delivery reliability based on the provided platform data. This is especially relevant for buyers managing marketplace replenishment, promotional schedules, or repeat low-MOQ orders.
Scoring Rationale
According to the scoring standard, an on-time delivery rate above 90% qualifies for the 9–10 point range. At 93.7%, the supplier demonstrates strong but not flawless delivery performance. The score reflects reliable fulfillment while leaving some margin for potential delivery exceptions.
Final Score
9 / 10
6. Quality & Customer Feedback
Basis
- Store rating: 4.8
- Reviews: 100+
- Verified supplier: True
- Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
- Factory Verification: supplier marked as verified, but detailed factory verification scope is Insufficient Data
Elaboration
The supplier has a strong customer-facing quality signal through a 4.8 store rating and 100+ reviews. These indicators suggest generally positive buyer satisfaction. However, the provided data does not confirm Finished Product Inspection, formal quality control procedures, product testing reports, or detailed factory verification scope.
Scoring Rationale
Customer feedback is positive and supported by a meaningful review count, which provides confidence in product and service consistency. However, the absence of explicit finished product inspection data or formal quality assurance documentation prevents a top-tier quality score. The verified supplier status is helpful, but it does not fully substitute for documented inspection or quality control systems.
Final Score
16 / 20
Total Score
79 / 100
Procurement Recommendation
Recommended for cautious cooperation, especially for buyers seeking low-cost household washing and cleaning plastic products with low MOQ options and proven transaction activity. The supplier is suitable for small to medium-sized importers, online sellers, promotional product buyers, and buyers testing household cleaning accessory categories.
Key strengths include long-term Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance support, strong recent order volume, positive customer rating, and reliable on-time delivery. Main risks include limited factory scale, only moderate response speed, and insufficient data on Full Customization, Finished Product Inspection, formal quality certifications, or detailed factory audit scope.
Overall, the supplier shows solid commercial credibility and delivery reliability, with growth potential if it can provide clearer quality-control documentation, customization capabilities, and more detailed factory verification evidence.
Leave your comment