Zhuji Yujia Environmental Protection Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Executive Summary

Zhuji Yujia Environmental Protection Technology Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Zhejiang, with a reported factory area of 1,000+ m² and 30+ staff. The company appears to operate as a small-to-mid-sized supplier with verified supplier status, Gold Supplier membership for 8 years, Trade Assurance support, and platform labels including low MOQ for customization, warranty availability, and finished product inspection. Its listed products are mainly outdoor misting and cooling system-related items with low minimum order quantities of 1 piece, which may suit small-batch procurement, trial orders, and buyers requiring flexible MOQ. Business performance is supported by 200+ orders and CN¥202.8K+ transaction value over the past six months, a 4.7 store rating, and 60+ reviews. Key limitations include a moderate on-time delivery rate of 76.5%, limited disclosed service details, and insufficient data on broader certifications, production capacity, and customer portfolio.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength — 20 Points

Basis:
- Factory location: Zhejiang, China
- Factory area: 1,000+ m²
- Employees: 30+ staff
- Verified supplier: True

Elaboration:
The supplier has disclosed basic factory scale information, including a factory area exceeding 1,000 m² and a workforce of more than 30 employees. This indicates that the company has an established operating site and basic production organization rather than functioning only as a trading storefront. The verified supplier status further strengthens the credibility of its declared company profile. However, the available data does not include detailed annual production capacity, number of production lines, equipment list, factory audit reports, or internationally recognized factory certifications.

Scoring Rationale:
The company demonstrates basic manufacturing capability and verified supplier status, but its scale is relatively limited based on the disclosed 1,000+ m² facility and 30+ staff. This does not support classification as a large-scale stable supply chain. It fits best within the category of a smaller supplier with foundational production capability and some verification support.

Final Score: 12 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility — 20 Points

Basis:
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier tenure: 8 years
- Trade Assurance: True
- Certification / industry labels: Low MOQ for customization, Warranty available, Finished product inspection
- Verified supplier: True

Elaboration:
The supplier has a relatively mature platform presence, with 8 years as a Gold Supplier and Trade Assurance support. These indicators provide a stronger platform-level credibility base than newer or non-verified suppliers. The presence of finished product inspection and warranty-related labels also adds compliance and buyer protection value. However, the provided data does not show specific third-party management system certifications, product certifications, regulatory compliance documents, or detailed factory audit certificates.

Scoring Rationale:
An 8-year Gold Supplier record, Trade Assurance, verified supplier status, and inspection-related platform labels represent a solid platform credibility profile. The score is not placed at the top tier because certification information is limited to platform labels, and no external compliance certificates or detailed audit documentation are provided.

Final Score: 17 / 20

3. Business Performance — 20 Points

Basis:
- Orders in past 6 months: 200+
- Transaction value in past 6 months: CN¥202.8K+
- Store rating: 4.7
- Reviews: 60+

Elaboration:
The supplier shows active transaction performance, with more than 200 orders in the past six months. The transaction value of CN¥202.8K+ indicates ongoing commercial activity, although the average transaction size appears moderate based on the available order and value figures. The store rating of 4.7 is positive, and 60+ reviews provide some customer feedback base. The data supports the conclusion that the supplier has market validation, but the transaction scale does not indicate very high-volume or enterprise-level purchasing activity.

Scoring Rationale:
The company has stable recent order activity, a positive store rating, and a moderate review base. However, the transaction value is not high relative to the order count, and the review quantity is not large enough to classify the business performance as top-tier. It is best assessed as a stable medium-to-lower transaction performer with credible but not outstanding commercial validation.

Final Score: 15 / 20

4. Service Capability — 10 Points

Basis:
- Communication response time: ≤8h
- Full Customization: Insufficient Data
- Customization-related label: Low MOQ for customization

Elaboration:
The disclosed response time of within 8 hours suggests the supplier is responsive within a normal business communication cycle, but it does not meet the strongest service benchmark of responding within one hour. The label “Low MOQ for customization” indicates some degree of customization flexibility, especially for buyers testing products or placing smaller customized orders. However, the data does not confirm Full Customization capability, design support, engineering support, sample development process, or dedicated account service.

Scoring Rationale:
The supplier has acceptable communication responsiveness and a platform label indicating low-MOQ customization support. Since response time is not within the highest-performing range and Full Customization is not confirmed, the service capability should be rated as moderate rather than strong.

Final Score: 7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance — 10 Points

Basis:
- On-time delivery rate: 76.5%

Elaboration:
The supplier’s disclosed on-time delivery rate is 76.5%. According to the scoring standard, a delivery rate between 70% and 79% falls into the 5–6 point range. This indicates that delivery reliability is a notable concern and may require additional procurement controls, especially for buyers with strict project timelines, seasonal demand, or replenishment schedules.

Scoring Rationale:
A 76.5% on-time shipment rate shows that the supplier can complete deliveries but has a meaningful risk of delayed dispatch. This is below the 80% threshold for acceptable mid-level performance and significantly below the 90%+ level expected from strong delivery partners.

Final Score: 6 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback — 20 Points

Basis:
- Store rating: 4.7
- Reviews: 60+
- Finished product inspection: Present
- Verified supplier: True
- Factory Verification: Insufficient Data

Elaboration:
The supplier has a favorable store rating of 4.7 and more than 60 reviews, which provides a meaningful but not extensive customer feedback base. The finished product inspection label is a positive quality-control indicator, suggesting that some level of inspection is applied before shipment. Verified supplier status further supports basic credibility. However, the provided information does not confirm Factory Verification specifically, detailed inspection procedures, defect rates, quality certifications, product test reports, or customer complaint records.

Scoring Rationale:
The supplier demonstrates a good rating, some review volume, and a finished product inspection label, which supports a moderate-to-good quality profile. The score is limited because the review base is not large, and factory verification or formal quality system evidence is not sufficiently disclosed.

Final Score: 15 / 20

Total Score

• Company Strength: 12 / 20
• Platform & Compliance Credibility: 17 / 20
• Business Performance: 15 / 20
• Service Capability: 7 / 10
• Delivery Performance: 6 / 10
• Quality & Customer Feedback: 15 / 20

Total Score: 72 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Cooperation is conditionally recommended, especially for small-batch buyers, trial orders, flexible MOQ purchasing, and procurement teams sourcing outdoor misting or cooling system-related products. The supplier has a credible platform history, Trade Assurance support, verified supplier status, active recent transaction records, and a good store rating.

The main risks are delivery reliability, limited disclosed production scale, and insufficient data on formal factory certifications, Full Customization capability, factory verification, and detailed quality-control systems. Buyers with strict lead-time requirements should confirm production schedules, shipment commitments, and penalty terms before placing larger orders.

The supplier’s growth potential is moderate. Its 8-year Gold Supplier history, 200+ recent orders, finished product inspection label, and low MOQ positioning suggest it can serve flexible and smaller-volume procurement needs effectively. However, to become suitable for larger or more time-sensitive buyers, it would need stronger delivery performance, more transparent quality documentation, and clearer evidence of production capacity.