zemez1039

Phones: 800
    • Shopping Cart
    • Checkout
News Top
  • Company Center
  • Featured Companies
  • Newest Companies
  • Recommended Companies

Guangzhou Ceyuan Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

18.07.26 0 Comments Posted by

Executive Summary

Guangzhou Ceyuan Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Guangdong, offering bowling alley and amusement bowling machine products with listed MOQs of 2 units or 2 sets. The company shows a modest physical scale, with a factory area of over 3,000㎡ and more than 40 staff, while also being marked as a verified supplier. Its strongest advantages are platform credibility and transaction visibility: it has 14 years as an Gold Supplier, supports Trade Assurance, and has recorded 30+ orders with CN¥3.6M+ transaction value over the past six months. The supplier also shows a 5.0 store rating, although the review base is limited to 6 reviews. Delivery performance is strong at 93.8% on-time shipment. This supplier appears suitable for buyers seeking verified bowling entertainment equipment suppliers with platform-backed transaction protection, especially small-to-medium commercial projects. However, buyers should further verify customization depth, quality consistency, and after-sales terms before larger procurement commitments.

Guangzhou Ceyuan Electronic Technology Co., Ltd.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis:
- Factory location: Guangdong, China
- Factory area: 3,000+㎡
- Staff size: 40+ staff
- Verified supplier: True

Elaboration:
The supplier has a defined production base with a factory area above 3,000㎡ and a workforce of more than 40 people. This indicates basic manufacturing and operational capacity, but the available data does not support classification as a large-scale factory. The verified supplier status provides some credibility regarding company existence and platform-level supplier validation.

Scoring Rationale:
The company demonstrates real factory presence and basic production capability, supported by factory verification. However, the factory size and staff count are closer to a small-to-medium operation rather than a large-scale industrial supplier. No additional factory audit details, production line count, monthly capacity, or advanced manufacturing certifications are provided.

Final Score: 13 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis:
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier history: 14 years
- Trade Assurance: True
- Certification / industry tags: 3D design capabilities, Warranty available, Finished product inspection, ODM service available
- Verified supplier: True

Elaboration:
The supplier has a long platform history, which is a significant credibility factor. Trade Assurance availability adds transaction protection for buyers. The listed tags also indicate certain service and quality-related capabilities, including finished product inspection and ODM service availability.

Scoring Rationale:
A 14-year Gold Supplier history, Trade Assurance support, and verified supplier status together form a strong platform credibility profile. The certification and service tags are relatively complete for platform-based sourcing. However, the data does not provide independent third-party certifications beyond the platform labels.

Final Score: 19 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis:
- Orders in past 6 months: 30+
- Transaction amount in past 6 months: CN¥3.6M+
- Store rating: 5.0
- Number of reviews: 6

Elaboration:
The supplier has demonstrated recent commercial activity, with more than 30 orders and CN¥3.6M+ transaction value in the past six months. This suggests that the supplier has completed meaningful transactions on the platform. The 5.0 rating is positive, but the review count is limited.

Scoring Rationale:
The transaction value is relatively strong and the order count shows active business performance. However, only 6 reviews are available, which limits the reliability of the rating as a broad customer satisfaction indicator. The supplier performs well commercially, but the limited review base prevents a top-tier score.

Final Score: 17 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis:
- Response time: ≤2h
- ODM service available: Listed in platform tags
- Full Customization: Insufficient Data

Elaboration:
The supplier’s response time of no more than 2 hours indicates reasonably efficient communication. ODM service availability suggests some capability to support buyer-specific product adaptation or design-related requirements. However, the data does not explicitly confirm Full Customization capability.

Scoring Rationale:
The response speed is good but does not meet the highest benchmark of response within 1 hour. ODM service is a positive indicator, but Full Customization is not directly supported by the provided data. Therefore, the supplier fits the normal-to-good service capability range rather than the strongest category.

Final Score: 7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis:
- On-time delivery rate: 93.8%

Elaboration:
The supplier’s 93.8% on-time shipment rate indicates strong delivery reliability based on the provided platform data. This suggests the supplier is generally able to meet agreed shipping timelines.

Scoring Rationale:
According to the scoring standard, an on-time delivery rate above 90% qualifies for the 9–10 point range. While 93.8% is strong, it is not perfect, so a high but not maximum score is appropriate.

Final Score: 9 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis:
- Store rating: 5.0
- Review count: 6
- Finished product inspection: Listed
- Verified supplier / factory verification: True

Elaboration:
The supplier has a perfect 5.0 store rating and provides finished product inspection according to the listed platform tags. Factory or supplier verification is also present, adding a basic level of quality assurance credibility. However, the review count is small, so customer feedback depth remains limited.

Scoring Rationale:
The quality-related indicators are positive, especially finished product inspection and verification status. However, only 6 reviews are available, which is not enough to confirm broad and consistent customer satisfaction across many transactions. The supplier has a good quality assurance foundation, but customer feedback volume is insufficient for a top score.

Final Score: 16 / 20

Total Score

81 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Cooperation is recommended with controlled procurement risk. Guangzhou Ceyuan Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. is suitable for buyers sourcing bowling alley or amusement bowling equipment who value platform credibility, Trade Assurance, verified supplier status, and recent transaction records. It is especially suitable for small-to-medium commercial entertainment projects or buyers starting with sample or limited-volume orders.

Key risks include limited review volume, unclear Full Customization capability, and insufficient data on production capacity, technical certifications, after-sales service scope, and detailed quality control procedures. Growth potential is supported by its 14-year Gold Supplier history, CN¥3.6M+ recent transaction value, ODM service availability, and strong 93.8% on-time delivery rate. For larger orders, buyers should request factory audit documents, detailed inspection standards, warranty terms, customization confirmation, and project references before finalizing procurement.

  • Comments

Comments

Leave your comment
Cancel reply

Note: HTML is not translated!

Submit comment

Most popular Blog

Guangzhou Likate Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Likate Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Juda Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Juda Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Lianxian Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Lianxian Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Saiboro Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Saiboro Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Langston Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Langston Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Epark Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Epark Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Haike Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Haike Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Sunshine Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Sunshine Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Lipinyou Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Lipinyou Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Taishi Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Taishi Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Lkg Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Lkg Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Hongma Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Hongma Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Wesdar Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Wesdar Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Qida Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Qida Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Bolei Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Bolei Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Texua Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Texua Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Meishi Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Meishi Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Shinhome Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Shinhome Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Shen Kang Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Shen Kang Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiaxing Tr-Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiaxing Tr-Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Blog You May Like

Shandong Rayman Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Rayman Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Taizhou City Huangyan Beiwei Mould Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Taizhou City Huangyan Beiwei Mould Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Cania Technology Co., Limited Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Cania Technology Co., Limited Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Masin International Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Masin International Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Sunbright Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Sunbright Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Boegam Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Boegam Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Weifang Zhonglei Integrated Housing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Weifang Zhonglei Integrated Housing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Henan Vipoo Rubber Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Henan Vipoo Rubber Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Onegol Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Onegol Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shaoguan Skymen Ultrasonic Technology Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shaoguan Skymen Ultrasonic Technology Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Generator Power Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Generator Power Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Edup Electronics Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Edup Electronics Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Lisheng Technology Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Lisheng Technology Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Gt Commodity Factory Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Gt Commodity Factory Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Ansheng Insulation Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Ansheng Insulation Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Kinsland Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Kinsland Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wenzhou Langtu Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wenzhou Langtu Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Boshi Apparel Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Boshi Apparel Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Henan Kellen Machinery Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Henan Kellen Machinery Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Juji Import And Export Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Juji Import And Export Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Information

  • About Us

Store Info

Address:
4578 Marmora Road, Glasgow, D04 89GR
Phones:
800
We are open:

E-mail: kimibetters@gmail.com

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

Get all the latest information on Events, Sales and Offers. Sign up for newsletter today.

Powered By News Top © 2026