Guangzhou Weishida Leather Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Executive Summary
Guangzhou Weishida Leather Co., Ltd. is a Guangdong, China-based supplier offering faux leather and PVC-related fabric products, including foam embroidery leather stitching, artificial leather fabrics, patent leopard print film, double-side faux leather, and anti-scratch PVC materials. The supplier shows solid platform credibility through Gold Supplier status for 2 years, Trade Assurance support, and verified supplier status. Commercial performance is relatively strong, with 200+ orders and CN¥1.2M+ transaction value in the past six months, supported by a 4.8 store rating and 50+ reviews. Delivery performance is a clear strength, with a 97.6% on-time shipment rate. However, the disclosed factory area is only 150+㎡, employee count is not provided, and there is no available data on Full Customization or Finished Product Inspection. This supplier appears suitable for buyers seeking active, platform-verified leather/faux leather fabric suppliers with reliable delivery, but larger-volume buyers should further verify production capacity before placing substantial orders.

Detailed Analysis
1. Company Strength
Basis
- Company Name: Guangzhou Weishida Leather Co., Ltd.
- Location: Guangdong, China
- Factory Area: 150+㎡
- Employee Count: Insufficient Data
- Verified Supplier / Factory Verification: True
- Product Scope: Faux leather, PVC leather, artificial leather fabrics, patent film, double-side faux leather, embroidery leather stitching materials
Elaboration
The supplier has a disclosed factory area of 150+㎡, which indicates a relatively small physical production or operating space based on the available data. The company offers multiple leather and faux leather-related material products, suggesting some product-line diversity within synthetic leather and fabric materials. However, the absence of employee count prevents a complete assessment of workforce scale, production depth, and labor capacity.
The verified supplier status is a positive indicator, as it provides some level of third-party or platform-based validation. Still, the available data does not include detailed factory audit results, production line quantity, machinery information, monthly output, or capacity utilization. Therefore, the company’s operational scale cannot be assessed as large or fully mature based only on the submitted information.
Scoring Rationale
The supplier has basic company credibility through verified supplier status and a defined product portfolio. However, the factory area is small at 150+㎡, and employee count is missing. These limitations reduce confidence in large-scale supply capability. The company appears to have basic production or supply capability, but the available data does not support classification as a medium or large-scale factory.
Final Score
10 / 20
2. Platform & Compliance Credibility
Basis
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier Tenure: 2 years
- Trade Assurance: True
- Verified Supplier: True
- Certification / Industry Tags Provided:
- Response time ≤1h
- On-time delivery 97.6%
Elaboration
The supplier has Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance support, and verified supplier status. These are important platform-based credibility indicators, particularly for international buyers who require transaction protection and basic supplier verification. The 2-year Gold Supplier tenure is positive but still relatively short compared with long-established suppliers on the platform.
The available certification or industry labels mainly relate to response speed and delivery performance. There is no disclosed information about product-specific certifications, quality management system certifications, environmental certifications, social compliance audits, or industry-standard testing reports. As a result, the supplier’s compliance profile is credible at the platform level but not fully developed from a broader certification perspective.
Scoring Rationale
The supplier meets several core platform credibility requirements: Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance, and verified supplier status. However, the Gold Supplier history is only 2 years, and no additional formal product or factory certifications are provided in the data. This supports a score in the range of suppliers with core platform credibility but limited long-term track record and incomplete certification visibility.
Final Score
15 / 20
3. Business Performance
Basis
- Orders in Past 6 Months: 200+
- Transaction Value in Past 6 Months: CN¥1.2M+
- Store Rating: 4.8
- Number of Reviews: 50+
Elaboration
The supplier demonstrates strong recent commercial activity, with more than 200 orders and transaction value exceeding CN¥1.2M over the past six months. This indicates that the supplier has active buyer engagement and a proven transaction record on the platform.
The store rating of 4.8 is positive and suggests a generally favorable buyer experience. The review count of 50+ provides some validation from previous customers, although it is not an exceptionally large review base. Overall, the combination of order count, transaction value, rating, and reviews indicates a supplier with meaningful market activity rather than a newly listed or commercially unproven vendor.
Scoring Rationale
The supplier’s business performance is one of its stronger areas. The past six-month order count and transaction value show active demand and practical transaction capability. A 4.8 rating further supports buyer satisfaction. The review count is adequate but not large enough to fully eliminate risk, so the score is strong but not at the absolute maximum.
Final Score
18 / 20
4. Service Capability
Basis
- Communication Response Time: ≤1h
- Platform Tag: Response time ≤1h
- Full Customization: Insufficient Data
Elaboration
The supplier’s response time of within one hour is a clear service advantage. Fast communication is important for sample discussion, quotation clarification, order adjustment, delivery coordination, and after-sales issue handling. This response performance suggests that the supplier is reasonably attentive and accessible on the platform.
However, there is no provided evidence that the supplier supports Full Customization. Although the product list includes various leather and faux leather materials, the data does not confirm whether the supplier can provide customized colors, textures, thicknesses, backing materials, patterns, packaging, or private-label services. Therefore, customization capability must be treated as Insufficient Data.
Scoring Rationale
The supplier performs well in response speed, meeting the highest response-time standard. However, since Full Customization is not confirmed, the overall service capability cannot be scored at the top level. The supplier appears suitable for responsive communication and standard product inquiries, but buyers requiring complex customization should verify capability before proceeding.
Final Score
7 / 10
5. Delivery Performance
Basis
- On-time Delivery Rate: 97.6%
Elaboration
The supplier reports an on-time delivery rate of 97.6%, which is a strong delivery performance indicator. A rate above 90% falls into the highest scoring band under the provided evaluation standard. This suggests that the supplier has been able to fulfill orders within expected shipment timelines for most transactions.
Reliable delivery is especially important for fabric and leather material buyers who need to maintain production schedules. Based on the available data, delivery reliability is one of the supplier’s strongest measurable advantages.
Scoring Rationale
The on-time delivery rate is 97.6%, clearly above the 90% threshold required for a 9–10 score. Since the figure is significantly above the benchmark and no contradictory delivery data is provided, the supplier merits a top score in this dimension.
Final Score
10 / 10
6. Quality & Customer Feedback
Basis
- Store Rating: 4.8
- Review Count: 50+
- Verified Supplier / Factory Verification: True
- Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
- Product Categories: Faux leather and PVC-related fabric materials
Elaboration
The supplier’s 4.8 store rating indicates generally positive customer feedback. The 50+ review count provides a moderate level of market validation, showing that the rating is supported by actual customer responses rather than a very small sample size. Verified supplier status also contributes to quality confidence by confirming that some level of supplier validation has been completed.
However, no data is provided regarding Finished Product Inspection. There is also no information on quality control procedures, defect rates, laboratory testing, material compliance, inspection reports, or third-party quality certifications. For leather, faux leather, and PVC materials, buyers may need to verify thickness tolerance, surface durability, color fastness, anti-scratch performance, smell, backing quality, and consistency across batches, but such details are not included in the provided data.
Scoring Rationale
The supplier has a good store rating and a moderate number of reviews, supported by verified supplier status. These factors justify a positive quality and feedback score. However, the lack of disclosed Finished Product Inspection and detailed quality-control evidence prevents the supplier from reaching the highest score range. Quality confidence is reasonable but not fully documented.
Final Score
16 / 20
Total Score
| Dimension | Score |
|---|---|
| Company Strength | 10 / 20 |
| Platform & Compliance Credibility | 15 / 20 |
| Business Performance | 18 / 20 |
| Service Capability | 7 / 10 |
| Delivery Performance | 10 / 10 |
| Quality & Customer Feedback | 16 / 20 |
| Total Score | 76 / 100 |
Procurement Recommendation
Recommendation: Conditional Cooperation Recommended
Guangzhou Weishida Leather Co., Ltd. is recommended for buyers seeking faux leather, PVC leather, artificial leather fabrics, and related material products from an active supplier with strong delivery performance and solid recent transaction activity. The supplier is particularly suitable for small to medium-sized buyers, sample-based sourcing, repeat orders of standard materials, and buyers who value fast response and Trade Assurance protection.
The main risks are limited disclosed factory scale, missing employee count, lack of confirmed Full Customization capability, and insufficient data on Finished Product Inspection or formal quality certifications. Buyers planning large-volume or highly customized procurement should request additional factory capacity evidence, production photos or videos, sample validation, inspection procedures, and pre-shipment quality control confirmation.
Overall, the supplier shows good commercial traction and reliable delivery performance, with growth potential if it can provide stronger documentation on production capacity, quality systems, and customization capability.
Leave your comment