Handan Haosheng Fastener Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Executive Summary

Handan Haosheng Fastener Co., Ltd. is a China-based fastener supplier located in Hebei, with a reported factory area of over 20,000 sqm and more than 130 staff. Based on the provided data, the company shows a medium-scale manufacturing profile with verified/audited supplier status, Gold Supplier membership for 3 years, Trade Assurance support, and customization-related service tags including ODM, full customization, and minor customization. Its recent platform performance indicates 100+ orders and CN¥405.6K+ transaction value over the past six months, supported by a 4.4 store rating and 40+ reviews. However, the supplier’s delivery performance is a clear concern, with an on-time dispatch rate of only 66.9%. Quality assurance information is partially available through supplier verification and customer feedback, but Finished Product Inspection data is not provided. Overall, this supplier may be suitable for buyers seeking customized or standard fastener products with moderate order volumes, provided that delivery timelines and pre-shipment quality controls are contractually managed.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis

• Factory location: Hebei, China
• Factory area: 20,000+ sqm
• Employees: 130+ staff
• Audited / verified supplier: True
• Product scope shown: multiple fastener-related products including countersunk items, aluminum car-related packs, wood screws, threaded products, and high-strength fasteners

Elaboration

The supplier demonstrates a solid physical manufacturing base, with a factory area exceeding 20,000 sqm and a workforce of more than 130 employees. This indicates a supplier above small-workshop level and suggests the ability to handle regular production demand across multiple fastener categories. The presence of audited supplier status further strengthens confidence in its operational legitimacy and basic factory infrastructure.

However, the provided data does not include annual production capacity, number of production lines, machinery details, export ratio, or specific factory certifications such as ISO-related certifications. Therefore, while the company appears to have a stable production foundation, the available information is not sufficient to classify it as a large-scale, fully mature industrial supplier.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier fits the profile of a medium-sized stable factory. Its factory size, employee base, and audited supplier status support a relatively strong company strength score. The score is not placed in the highest range because there is insufficient data on production capacity, equipment, management systems, and formal factory certifications beyond the audited supplier indication.

Final Score

17 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis

• Gold Supplier: True
• Gold Supplier duration: 3 years
• Trade Assurance: True
• Audited / verified supplier: True
• Certification / industry tags: Warranty available, ODM service available, Full customization, Minor customization

Elaboration

The supplier has several important platform credibility indicators. Gold Supplier status confirms a paid supplier presence on , while the 3-year duration indicates some operating history on the platform, though not long-term compared with suppliers with much longer membership records. Trade Assurance support provides buyers with an additional transaction protection mechanism. The audited supplier status further improves trustworthiness from a procurement screening perspective.

The available tags also indicate service and customization capability. However, the data does not include detailed compliance certificates, third-party factory audit reports, ISO certifications, product compliance documentation, or market-specific certifications. Therefore, the platform credibility is solid, but the compliance profile remains only partially evidenced.

Scoring Rationale

Core platform credibility elements are present: Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance, audited supplier status, and service tags. The 3-year Gold Supplier period supports credibility but is not long enough to justify a top-tier score. The lack of detailed certification documentation limits the score from reaching the 18–20 range.

Final Score

16 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis

• Orders in past 6 months: 100+
• Transaction value in past 6 months: CN¥405.6K+
• Store rating: 4.4
• Review count: 40+

Elaboration

The supplier has visible commercial activity on the platform, with more than 100 orders and over CN¥405.6K in transaction value during the past six months. This indicates that the supplier is not inactive and has achieved a measurable level of buyer engagement. The 40+ reviews provide some customer feedback base, though the number is not large enough to represent broad market validation.

The store rating of 4.4 is acceptable but not outstanding. It suggests generally positive buyer experience, but also leaves room for improvement compared with suppliers maintaining higher ratings. The transaction value and order count reflect stable but moderate commercial performance rather than very high-volume platform dominance.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier shows stable medium-level business activity, supported by a meaningful order count and transaction value. However, the rating of 4.4 and review count of 40+ are not strong enough to classify the supplier as a high-performing commercial leader. The score is therefore placed in the mid-range for stable, moderate business performance.

Final Score

15 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis

• Communication response time: ≤8h
• Customization-related tags: ODM service available, Full customization, Minor customization

Elaboration

The supplier provides a response time of within 8 hours, which is acceptable for normal supplier communication but does not meet the strongest service benchmark of response within one hour. The presence of ODM, full customization, and minor customization tags indicates that the supplier can support different levels of tailored product requirements.

However, the provided data does not include response rate percentage, average quotation turnaround time, engineering support capability, sample lead time, language support, or dedicated account management information. Therefore, the supplier’s service capability appears functional and customization-oriented, but not fully proven at a premium service level.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier supports customization and responds within a reasonable timeframe, which justifies a solid service capability score. The score is not higher because the response time is not within one hour and there is insufficient data on deeper service execution capabilities such as technical support, sample management, or after-sales handling.

Final Score

7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis

• On-time dispatch rate: 66.9%

Elaboration

Delivery performance is the weakest area in the provided supplier profile. An on-time dispatch rate of 66.9% is below the 70% threshold and indicates a significant risk for buyers with strict delivery schedules. This may affect replenishment planning, project timelines, seasonal demand, or production continuity for downstream buyers.

No additional information is provided regarding average lead time, delay reasons, logistics partners, inventory availability, or emergency shipment handling. Therefore, the delivery risk must be treated as material based strictly on the available on-time dispatch data.

Scoring Rationale

According to the scoring standard, an on-time dispatch rate below 70% should receive below 5 points. Since the supplier’s rate is 66.9%, the delivery score is limited despite its other operational strengths. Buyers should consider delivery clauses, buffer time, and milestone tracking if engaging this supplier.

Final Score

4 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis

• Store rating: 4.4
• Review count: 40+
• Audited / verified supplier: True
• Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
• Factory Verification: Supplier audit/verification indicated as True, but detailed factory verification report is not provided

Elaboration

The supplier has a moderate customer feedback base, with a 4.4 rating and more than 40 reviews. This provides some evidence of buyer satisfaction, but the feedback volume is not large enough to fully confirm consistent quality performance across many transactions. The audited supplier status provides a degree of quality-related confidence at the company verification level.

However, the data does not confirm Finished Product Inspection, detailed QC procedures, defect rate, product testing standards, inspection equipment, or formal quality management certifications. As a result, the quality assurance system cannot be considered fully transparent from the provided information. The supplier appears to have basic quality credibility, but additional buyer-side verification would be necessary before large or technically sensitive orders.

Scoring Rationale

The rating and reviews support a reasonable quality perception, and audited supplier status adds some credibility. However, the lack of Finished Product Inspection information and limited quality system details prevent a high score. The score reflects acceptable but not fully validated quality assurance.

Final Score

14 / 20

Total Score

Procurement Recommendation

Handan Haosheng Fastener Co., Ltd. is recommended for conditional cooperation rather than unrestricted long-term partnership at this stage.

The supplier is suitable for buyers seeking standard or customized fastener products, especially small to medium-volume procurement projects where factory scale, customization support, and Trade Assurance are important. Its 20,000+ sqm facility, 130+ staff, audited supplier status, and recent transaction activity indicate a credible medium-scale supplier.

The main risk is delivery reliability, as the on-time dispatch rate of 66.9% is below acceptable procurement standards for time-sensitive supply chains. Quality information is also not fully complete, especially because Finished Product Inspection data is not provided.

Recommended procurement controls: - Start with sample orders or pilot batches before larger commitments. - Use Trade Assurance for transaction protection. - Confirm lead times in writing before placing orders. - Require pre-shipment inspection or third-party inspection for important orders. - Build additional delivery buffer into procurement planning.

Overall, the supplier has moderate growth potential due to its factory size, platform credibility, and customization capability, but delivery performance and incomplete quality assurance data should be actively managed before scaling cooperation.