zemez1039

Phones: 800
    • Shopping Cart
    • Checkout
News Top
  • Company Center
  • Featured Companies
  • Newest Companies
  • Recommended Companies

Hangzhou Sunbeauty Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

13.07.26 0 Comments Posted by

Executive Summary

Hangzhou Sunbeauty Industrial Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Zhejiang, with a reported factory area of 2,200+㎡ and 100+ staff. Based on the provided product data, its listed offerings are mainly paper, cardboard, paper mache, lantern, and seasonal decorative items, generally with a minimum order quantity of 1,000 pieces. The supplier shows strong platform credibility, including 13 years as an Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance support, and verified supplier status. Commercial activity is moderate, with 50+ orders and CN¥405.6K+ transaction value over the past six months. The store rating is excellent at 5.0, but the review base is limited to 5 reviews, so quality confidence is not fully validated by large-scale customer feedback. Delivery performance is reasonably stable at 88.9% on-time delivery. Overall, this supplier is suitable for buyers seeking mid-volume paper-based decorative or craft products, especially where platform protection and supplier tenure are important.

Hangzhou Sunbeauty Industrial Co., Ltd.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis
- Factory location: Zhejiang, China
- Factory area: 2,200+㎡
- Employees: 100+ staff
- Verified supplier: True

Elaboration
The supplier has a moderate physical production base, with more than 2,200 square meters of factory space and over 100 employees. This indicates a structured manufacturing operation rather than a very small workshop. The verified supplier status adds credibility to the existence and basic operating capacity of the company.

Scoring Rationale
The company appears to have stable mid-sized production capability. However, the provided factory area and employee count do not indicate a very large-scale industrial facility. There is no additional data on production lines, monthly output, automation level, or factory certifications beyond verified supplier status. Therefore, the supplier fits best into the “medium stable factory” range rather than the top-tier large-scale category.

Final Score
15 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier duration: 13 years
- Trade Assurance: True
- Verified supplier: True
- Platform tags: Low MOQ for customization, Response time ≤6h, On-time delivery 88.9%

Elaboration
The supplier has a long presence, with 13 years as a Gold Supplier. Trade Assurance support provides a platform-backed transaction mechanism, which is important for procurement risk control. The verified supplier status further strengthens platform credibility.

Scoring Rationale
This is one of the supplier’s strongest areas. A 13-year Gold Supplier record, Trade Assurance availability, and verified supplier status together indicate a relatively mature and credible platform profile. The only limitation is that the provided data does not include detailed third-party factory audit reports, compliance certificates, or industry-specific certifications.

Final Score
18 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis
- Past 6-month orders: 50+
- Past 6-month transaction value: CN¥405.6K+
- Store rating: 5.0
- Reviews: 5

Elaboration
The supplier has demonstrated recent transaction activity, with more than 50 orders and CN¥405.6K+ in transaction value over the past six months. The 5.0 store rating is positive, but the number of reviews is low, limiting the statistical strength of the rating.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier shows moderate commercial validation. Order volume and transaction value suggest active sales, but they do not indicate very high-volume marketplace performance. The excellent rating supports confidence, yet only 5 reviews are available, so the feedback base is not broad enough to justify a top score.

Final Score
15 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis
- Response time: ≤6h
- Customization-related tag: Low MOQ for customization
- Full Customization: Insufficient Data

Elaboration
The supplier’s response time of within 6 hours indicates acceptable communication efficiency for normal procurement inquiries. The platform tag suggests some customization support at lower MOQs, but there is no explicit confirmation of Full Customization capability.

Scoring Rationale
Service capability appears functional but not exceptional. The response time is reasonable, but it does not meet the strongest benchmark of ≤1 hour. Customization capability is partially supported by the “Low MOQ for customization” tag, but the absence of clear Full Customization data prevents a higher score.

Final Score
7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis
- On-time delivery rate: 88.9%

Elaboration
The supplier’s on-time delivery rate is close to 90%, indicating generally stable delivery execution. However, it remains below the 90% threshold for the highest scoring band.

Scoring Rationale
An 88.9% on-time delivery rate falls within the 80–89% range. This supports a score in the 7–8 band. The performance is acceptable for standard procurement, but buyers with strict delivery windows should monitor shipment schedules closely.

Final Score
8 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis
- Store rating: 5.0
- Reviews: 5
- Verified supplier: True
- Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
- Factory Verification: True / verified supplier status provided

Elaboration
The supplier has a perfect store rating based on the available data, which is positive. However, the number of reviews is limited, so the rating does not yet represent a large customer feedback base. Verified supplier status supports basic quality and operational credibility, but no specific Finished Product Inspection system is provided.

Scoring Rationale
The quality signal is positive but not fully proven. A 5.0 rating is strong, and verified supplier status adds confidence, but only 5 reviews are available and there is insufficient data on Finished Product Inspection. This places the supplier in the good but not top-tier quality assurance range.

Final Score
15 / 20

Total Score

78 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Cooperation is recommended with controlled order management. Hangzhou Sunbeauty Industrial Co., Ltd. is suitable for buyers sourcing paper, cardboard, paper mache, lantern, and seasonal decorative products at mid-volume order levels. Its main strengths are long platform history, Trade Assurance support, verified supplier status, moderate transaction activity, and acceptable delivery performance. Key risks include limited review volume, lack of provided Finished Product Inspection data, and no clear evidence of Full Customization capability. Growth potential exists if the supplier can demonstrate stronger quality control documentation, broader customer feedback, and improved on-time delivery above 90%.

  • Comments

Comments

Leave your comment
Cancel reply

Note: HTML is not translated!

Submit comment

Most popular Blog

Hangzhou Yayang Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Yayang Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Tyco Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Tyco Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Moonbay Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Moonbay Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Yintex Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Yintex Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Hydrotech Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Hydrotech Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Rollmed Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Rollmed Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Jinglian I & E Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Jinglian I & E Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Huanwei Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Huanwei Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Bison Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Bison Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Grin (Hangzhou) Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Grin (Hangzhou) Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Fenloc Bondtek Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Fenloc Bondtek Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Sdm Magnetics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Sdm Magnetics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Jiuzhong Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Jiuzhong Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Benhao Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Benhao Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Langbin Technology (Hangzhou ) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Langbin Technology (Hangzhou ) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Fuhan Packaging Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Fuhan Packaging Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Yuanji Gift Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Yuanji Gift Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Meideng Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Meideng Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Nidu Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Nidu Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhongshan Jieweishi Electrical Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhongshan Jieweishi Electrical Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Blog You May Like

Quanzhou Baiyi Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Quanzhou Baiyi Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Kaixuan Seals Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Kaixuan Seals Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhangzhou Enjoy Agriculture Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhangzhou Enjoy Agriculture Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Huizhou Chuangjing Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Huizhou Chuangjing Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Tianjin Newspeed Cycle Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Tianjin Newspeed Cycle Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
G And N Fortune Limited Supplier Evaluation
G And N Fortune Limited Supplier Evaluation
Huizhou Kenjoy New Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Huizhou Kenjoy New Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhongshan Evson Science And Technology Development Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhongshan Evson Science And Technology Development Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anping County Dongjie Wire Mesh Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anping County Dongjie Wire Mesh Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Xixi Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Xixi Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hubei Wanta Electric Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hubei Wanta Electric Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Minglian Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Minglian Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Pango Medical Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Pango Medical Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Xintu Century Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Xintu Century Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Boshide Household Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Boshide Household Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Donglai Air Motive Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Donglai Air Motive Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Jinglian I & E Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Jinglian I & E Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Mifeng Electrical Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Mifeng Electrical Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Puyang Zhanqi Advertising Media Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Puyang Zhanqi Advertising Media Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Nanyang Dongyi Machinery Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Nanyang Dongyi Machinery Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Information

  • About Us

Store Info

Address:
4578 Marmora Road, Glasgow, D04 89GR
Phones:
800
We are open:

E-mail: kimibetters@gmail.com

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

Get all the latest information on Events, Sales and Offers. Sign up for newsletter today.

Powered By News Top © 2026