Huangshan Benma Group Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Executive Summary

Huangshan Benma Group Co., Ltd. is a China-based automotive spare parts supplier located in Anhui, with a reported factory area of over 26,000㎡ and more than 290 staff. The company presents a relatively solid manufacturing foundation and is identified as a verified supplier. Its listed products cover automotive spare parts such as electronic power steering controls, power steering pumps, control arms, plastic auto parts, and turbochargers. On the platform side, the supplier has strong credibility indicators, including 14 years as an Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance support, and a 100.0% on-time delivery label. However, recent commercial activity shows mixed signals: the past six-month order count is reported as 0, while transaction value is CN¥202.8K+, with a store rating of 4.6 and 20+ reviews. Overall, this supplier appears suitable for buyers seeking verified automotive parts sourcing with moderate factory scale and strong platform history, but buyers should further verify recent order activity, quality inspection processes, and customization capability before large-volume procurement.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength — 20 Points

Basis

• Company: Huangshan Benma Group Co., Ltd.
• Country/Region: China, Anhui Province
• Factory area: 26,000+㎡
• Employees: 290+ staff
• Verified supplier: True

Elaboration

The supplier reports a factory area of more than 26,000㎡ and a workforce exceeding 290 employees. This indicates a meaningful production footprint and an organized operating base rather than a very small trading-oriented setup. The verified supplier status also provides a basic level of external credibility regarding the company’s existence and operational profile.

The available data supports the view that the company has established manufacturing capacity for automotive spare parts. However, the provided information does not include detailed production lines, annual output, equipment lists, capacity utilization, or factory audit reports beyond the verified supplier indication. Therefore, while the company appears operationally stable, the depth of its manufacturing scale cannot be fully assessed.

Scoring Rationale

Given the factory size and employee count, Huangshan Benma Group fits the profile of a medium-sized stable supplier with a solid production base. The verified supplier status strengthens confidence, but the lack of detailed production capacity data prevents classification as a large-scale, fully transparent supply chain operation. The score therefore falls in the upper-middle range.

Final Score

16 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility — 20 Points

Basis

• Gold Supplier: True
• Gold Supplier duration: 14 years
• Trade Assurance: True
• Verification status: Verified supplier
• Platform labels: “Response time ≤6h”, “On-time delivery 100.0%”

Elaboration

The supplier has been an Gold Supplier for 14 years, which is a strong platform credibility indicator. Long-term presence on the platform suggests continuity and reduces the risk associated with newly established or unverified suppliers. Trade Assurance support is also important for international buyers, as it provides a structured transaction framework through the platform.

The supplier also carries platform performance labels, including response time within six hours and 100.0% on-time delivery. These labels strengthen platform-level credibility. However, the data does not provide specific third-party management system certifications, product certifications, or industry compliance certificates. Therefore, the assessment is strong from a platform credibility perspective, but not fully comprehensive from a broader compliance certification perspective.

Scoring Rationale

The combination of 14 years Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance, verified supplier status, and platform performance labels represents a strong credibility profile. The only limitation is the absence of detailed industry or product certification data. As a result, the supplier merits a high score, though not a perfect score.

Final Score

19 / 20

3. Business Performance — 20 Points

Basis

• Orders in the past 6 months: 0
• Transaction value in the past 6 months: CN¥202.8K+
• Store rating: 4.6
• Reviews: 20+

Elaboration

The business performance data is mixed. The reported transaction value of CN¥202.8K+ indicates that the supplier has generated measurable platform sales value. The store rating of 4.6 is generally positive, and the presence of 20+ reviews provides some level of customer feedback.

However, the reported past six-month order count is 0, which is a significant concern for recent commercial validation. This may indicate limited recent order activity or incomplete order visibility in the provided dataset. Since no additional explanation is provided, the assessment must treat this as a risk factor. The review count is also not large, which limits the statistical reliability of the rating compared with suppliers that have hundreds or thousands of reviews.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has some business validation through transaction value, store rating, and reviews, but the 0 reported orders in the past six months materially weakens the commercial performance assessment. The rating is acceptable, but the transaction and review scale do not support a high-performance classification. Therefore, the score is placed in the lower-middle range.

Final Score

12 / 20

4. Service Capability — 10 Points

Basis

• Communication response time: ≤6h
• Full Customization: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier’s response time is listed as within six hours. This is a reasonable communication level for standard sourcing communication, though it does not meet the strongest benchmark of response within one hour. For buyers managing RFQs, sample discussions, or order follow-up, a response time within six hours is generally workable.

However, the data does not confirm whether the supplier supports Full Customization. Since customization capability is one of the evaluation factors, the absence of this information limits the score. No data is provided regarding OEM/ODM services, engineering support, custom packaging, logo customization, or technical drawing adaptation.

Scoring Rationale

The response time supports a basic-to-normal service capability score. However, because there is no evidence of Full Customization capability, the supplier cannot be rated in the top service tier. The score reflects acceptable communication efficiency but incomplete service capability evidence.

Final Score

6 / 10

5. Delivery Performance — 10 Points

Basis

• On-time delivery rate: 100.0%

Elaboration

The supplier reports a 100.0% on-time delivery rate. Based on the scoring standard, any on-time delivery performance above 90% qualifies for the highest scoring range. This is a strong indicator for buyers concerned with order execution reliability.

However, the data does not provide the number of shipments or orders used to calculate this percentage. Given that the reported past six-month order count is 0, the delivery performance should be interpreted carefully. The supplier has a strong stated delivery metric, but the underlying shipment sample size is not disclosed.

Scoring Rationale

According to the provided scoring rule, 100.0% on-time delivery qualifies for 9–10 points. Since the reported rate is perfect, the supplier receives the maximum score for this dimension. The lack of shipment count should be noted as a validation point, but it does not change the metric-based score under the given standard.

Final Score

10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback — 20 Points

Basis

• Store rating: 4.6
• Reviews: 20+
• Verified supplier / factory verification: True
• Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier has a store rating of 4.6, which indicates generally positive customer feedback. The existence of 20+ reviews provides some customer validation, although the volume is relatively limited. This means the rating should be considered useful but not highly representative across a large buyer base.

The verified supplier status provides an additional layer of credibility, suggesting that the supplier has passed at least a platform-level verification process. However, the provided data does not confirm Finished Product Inspection, specific quality control procedures, inspection reports, defect rates, testing standards, or product certifications. For automotive spare parts, quality consistency is especially important, but such details are not available in the supplied dataset.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier demonstrates acceptable customer feedback and basic verification support. However, the review count is moderate, and the absence of Finished Product Inspection information prevents a higher quality assurance score. The score reflects good but not fully proven quality reliability.

Final Score

15 / 20

Total Score

Procurement Recommendation

Recommendation: Conditional Cooperation Recommended

Huangshan Benma Group Co., Ltd. is recommended for buyers seeking automotive spare parts from a verified China-based supplier with moderate factory scale, long platform history, Trade Assurance support, and strong stated delivery performance. The supplier appears suitable for small to medium procurement programs, sample orders, replacement parts sourcing, and buyers who value platform-backed transaction security.

However, large-volume procurement should proceed only after additional verification. The main risks are the reported 0 orders in the past six months, limited review volume, lack of confirmed Finished Product Inspection, and insufficient data on Full Customization capability. Buyers should request recent transaction references, product inspection records, sample testing, quality control documentation, and clarification on customization services before committing to larger orders.

The supplier’s growth potential lies in its established factory base, 14-year Gold Supplier history, and 100.0% on-time delivery indicator. If recent business activity and quality inspection systems can be further validated, it may become a stronger long-term sourcing candidate.