Huizhou Xinhaojia Silicone Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Executive Summary
Huizhou Xinhaojia Silicone Products Co., Ltd. is a Guangdong, China-based silicone products supplier with a reported factory area of over 5,000㎡ and more than 60 staff. The company appears positioned as a small-to-medium manufacturer focused on silicone kitchen, cleaning, and personal-care related products, with listed offerings such as silicone dishwashing brushes, kitchen cleaning brushes, heat-resistant mats, and shampoo brushes. Its platform profile shows basic credibility through Gold Supplier status for 2 years, Trade Assurance support, verified supplier status, and service tags including Finished Product Inspection, ODM service, Minor Customization, and Full Customization. Business performance is still limited, with 10+ orders and CN¥40.5K+ transaction value over the past six months, although the store rating is 5.0. However, the review base is only 1, and the on-time dispatch rate is low at 44.4%, creating a clear delivery reliability risk. This supplier is more suitable for buyers seeking small-batch silicone products or early-stage supplier development rather than high-volume time-sensitive procurement.

Detailed Analysis
1. Company Strength
Basis:
- Factory location: Guangdong, China
- Factory area: 5,000+㎡
- Employees: 60+ staff
- Verified supplier: True
- Specific factory certification: Insufficient Data
Elaboration:
The supplier has a measurable factory footprint and workforce, indicating basic in-house production capability. A 5,000+㎡ facility and 60+ employees suggest the company is not merely a trading profile, especially when combined with verified supplier status. However, the available data does not provide detailed production line capacity, monthly output, equipment list, or recognized factory audit certification.
Scoring Rationale:
The supplier demonstrates small-to-medium manufacturing strength with a defined factory size and staff base. Verified supplier status supports operational credibility, but the absence of detailed production scale data and specific factory certification prevents classification as a large-scale stable supply chain.
Final Score: 14 / 20
2. Platform & Compliance Credibility
Basis:
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier duration: 2 years
- Trade Assurance: True
- Verified supplier: True
- Tags: Finished Product Inspection, Minor Customization, ODM service available, Full Customization
Elaboration:
The supplier has core platform credibility elements, including Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance, and verified supplier status. The 2-year Gold Supplier duration is relatively short but still provides a basic platform operating history. The presence of Finished Product Inspection and customization-related tags strengthens the platform profile, although no external compliance certifications are provided.
Scoring Rationale:
The supplier has a reasonably complete platform credibility foundation, but the Gold Supplier history is short and the data does not show broader compliance certifications. This supports a solid but not top-tier credibility assessment.
Final Score: 16 / 20
3. Business Performance
Basis:
- Orders in past 6 months: 10+
- Transaction value in past 6 months: CN¥40.5K+
- Store rating: 5.0
- Reviews: 1
Elaboration:
The supplier has recorded recent transactions, but the order count and transaction value are modest. A 5.0 store rating is positive, yet the credibility of this rating is limited because it is based on only 1 review. The data indicates early or low-volume commercial activity rather than strong market validation.
Scoring Rationale:
Business activity exists, but both transaction volume and review base are limited. The high rating supports a positive signal, but the very small number of reviews prevents strong confidence in sustained customer satisfaction or repeat commercial performance.
Final Score: 11 / 20
4. Service Capability
Basis:
- Response time: ≤6h
- Full Customization: Available
- Minor Customization: Available
- ODM service: Available
Elaboration:
The supplier supports multiple customization formats, including Full Customization and ODM service, which is valuable for buyers requiring product adaptation. The response time of ≤6h is acceptable but not within the strongest service benchmark of ≤1h.
Scoring Rationale:
Customization capability is a clear strength based on the platform tags. However, communication speed is moderate rather than highly responsive, so the service capability is above basic level but not excellent.
Final Score: 7 / 10
5. Delivery Performance
Basis:
- On-time dispatch rate: 44.4%
Elaboration:
The on-time dispatch rate is significantly below the 70% threshold. This is the weakest area in the supplier profile and may affect buyers with strict delivery schedules, promotional timelines, or replenishment requirements.
Scoring Rationale:
Based strictly on the scoring standard, a rate below 70% should receive fewer than 5 points. At 44.4%, the supplier presents a material delivery reliability risk.
Final Score: 3 / 10
6. Quality & Customer Feedback
Basis:
- Store rating: 5.0
- Reviews: 1
- Finished Product Inspection: Available
- Factory Verification / Verified Supplier: True
Elaboration:
The supplier shows some quality assurance indicators through Finished Product Inspection and verified supplier status. The 5.0 rating is favorable, but the review count is too low to represent broad customer feedback. No detailed defect rate, inspection standard, product certification, or third-party quality audit data is provided.
Scoring Rationale:
Quality assurance signals are present, but customer feedback evidence is weak due to only 1 review. The supplier deserves a moderate score because inspection capability is listed, but the lack of broader feedback and detailed quality records limits confidence.
Final Score: 13 / 20
Total Score
64 / 100
Procurement Recommendation
Cooperation is conditionally recommended for low-to-medium risk sourcing, sample orders, small-batch procurement, or buyers developing silicone kitchen and cleaning product lines. The supplier has acceptable factory scale, platform credibility, Trade Assurance support, and customization capability. However, it is not recommended as a primary supplier for urgent, high-volume, or delivery-sensitive projects at this stage.
Main risks include the low 44.4% on-time dispatch rate, limited six-month transaction value, only 1 customer review, and insufficient data on formal factory certifications, production capacity, and detailed quality systems. Growth potential exists if the supplier improves delivery performance, accumulates more verified transactions and reviews, and provides stronger factory audit or compliance documentation.
Leave your comment