Jiangsu Greenshine Supcon Tech Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Executive Summary

Jiangsu Greenshine Supcon Tech Co., Ltd. is a Jiangsu-based Chinese supplier offering copper clad aluminum related products, including bimetallic metal copper clad aluminum CCA and CCA copper clad aluminum stranded twisted products. Based on the provided data, the company shows a moderate manufacturing foundation, with a reported factory area of over 12,000㎡, more than 70 staff, and verified supplier status. Its platform credibility is relatively strong due to 13 years as an Gold Supplier and support for Trade Assurance. Commercial performance is mixed: the supplier recorded only 4 orders in the past six months, but the transaction value exceeded CN¥1.4M, indicating fewer but potentially larger-value transactions. Key weaknesses are limited customer feedback, no available store rating, zero reviews, and a low on-time delivery rate of 50.0%. This supplier may be suitable for buyers prioritizing platform history and transaction value, but delivery reliability and quality validation require careful pre-order due diligence.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis
- Factory location: Jiangsu, China
- Factory area: 12,000+㎡
- Employees: 70+ staff
- Verified supplier: True

Elaboration
The supplier has a reported factory area of more than 12,000㎡ and over 70 employees, indicating a meaningful production base rather than a purely trading-oriented profile. The verified supplier status further supports the existence of a formal operating entity and some level of supplier validation.

Scoring Rationale
The company does not reach the scale of a large supply-chain manufacturer based on the available employee count, but the factory area and verified status support a stable medium-sized production capability. The available data is sufficient to indicate basic manufacturing strength, though no detailed production capacity, equipment list, or factory audit report is provided.

Final Score
16 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier duration: 13 years
- Trade Assurance: True
- Certification / industry tags: “Response time ≤4h”, “On-time delivery 50.0%”

Elaboration
The supplier has a long presence, with 13 years as a Gold Supplier, and supports Trade Assurance. These are positive indicators of platform credibility and transaction protection. However, the listed tags are operational indicators rather than comprehensive product, factory, or compliance certifications.

Scoring Rationale
The long Gold Supplier history and Trade Assurance support provide strong platform credibility. However, certification completeness is limited in the provided data, and no specific product certifications, management system certifications, or third-party compliance certificates are listed. Therefore, the score is strong but not at the highest level.

Final Score
18 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis
- Orders in past 6 months: 4
- Transaction value in past 6 months: CN¥1.4M+
- Store rating: Insufficient Data
- Reviews: 0

Elaboration
The transaction amount of over CN¥1.4M in the past six months is a positive commercial signal, especially relative to the low order count. However, only 4 orders indicate limited transaction frequency. The absence of store rating and the presence of zero reviews reduce the strength of external commercial validation.

Scoring Rationale
Business performance is mixed. The transaction value suggests that the supplier has completed meaningful order volume, but the small number of orders and lack of customer reviews make it difficult to confirm consistent market acceptance or buyer satisfaction. This places the supplier below the stable mid-to-high performance range.

Final Score
12 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis
- Communication response time: ≤4h
- Full Customization: Insufficient Data

Elaboration
A response time of four hours or less indicates acceptable communication efficiency for international sourcing. However, there is no provided evidence that the supplier supports Full Customization, engineering support, private labeling, or tailored production services.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier demonstrates reasonable responsiveness, but the absence of customization data limits confidence in broader service capability. It should be considered service-capable for basic inquiries and standard orders, but not yet proven for complex customized procurement requirements.

Final Score
7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis
- On-time delivery rate: 50.0%

Elaboration
The supplier’s reported on-time delivery rate is significantly below the 70% threshold. This is a major operational concern for buyers with strict delivery schedules, production planning requirements, or time-sensitive inventory cycles.

Scoring Rationale
According to the scoring standard, delivery performance below 70% should receive fewer than 5 points. A 50.0% on-time delivery rate indicates substantial delivery reliability risk and requires corrective confirmation before placing critical or urgent orders.

Final Score
3 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis
- Store rating: Insufficient Data
- Reviews: 0
- Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
- Factory / supplier verification: True

Elaboration
The supplier has verified supplier status, which provides some basic assurance regarding company legitimacy. However, there is no available store rating, no customer reviews, and no provided evidence of Finished Product Inspection. This creates a significant information gap in quality validation.

Scoring Rationale
Quality confidence is limited because customer feedback is absent and inspection systems are not documented in the provided data. While supplier verification is positive, it is not enough to confirm product consistency, defect control, or buyer satisfaction. The score therefore remains below 10 due to insufficient quality feedback data.

Final Score
8 / 20

Total Score

63 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Cooperation is conditionally recommended for buyers who can tolerate delivery risk and are willing to conduct additional verification before purchase. The supplier may be suitable for buyers sourcing copper clad aluminum related products with moderate order sizes, especially where platform history and Trade Assurance are important. Major risks include the low 50.0% on-time delivery rate, zero customer reviews, missing store rating, and insufficient data on Finished Product Inspection or customization capability. Growth potential exists due to the supplier’s 13-year Gold Supplier history, verified status, factory scale, and CN¥1.4M+ recent transaction value, but buyers should request delivery records, inspection procedures, product specifications, and sample validation before placing larger orders.