Jiangxi Grand Industrial & Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Executive Summary
Jiangxi Grand Industrial & Trading Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Jiangxi, with a reported factory area of 1,500+㎡ and 40+ staff. Based on the provided product listings, the company focuses on folding fans, bamboo crafts, antique-style fans, and related decorative or promotional fan products, with low MOQs ranging from 2 to 50 pieces. The supplier shows basic factory capability and is marked as a verified supplier, but the available scale indicators suggest a small-to-lower-mid-sized production operation rather than a large industrial manufacturer. On , it has Gold Supplier status for 1 year, supports Trade Assurance, and lists ODM, full customization, and minor customization capabilities. Commercial performance is moderate-to-low, with 20+ orders and CN¥54K+ transaction value over the past six months. The strongest data point is delivery, with a 100.0% on-time shipping rate. This supplier is most suitable for small-batch buyers, promotional product buyers, craft retailers, or customers requiring flexible customization with relatively low order thresholds.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength
Basis: Factory area is 1,500+㎡, staff size is 40+ people, and the supplier is marked as verified.
Elaboration: The factory size and employee count indicate that the company has basic production capacity, but the scale is not large. The verified supplier status provides some confidence that the company has undergone a level of supplier or factory verification, although no detailed audit report, production line count, annual capacity, or equipment information is provided.
Scoring Rationale: The supplier does not fit the profile of a large-scale stable supply chain due to limited factory area and workforce size. However, it demonstrates more than a purely trading-level profile because factory area, staff count, and verification status are available. The lack of detailed production capacity data prevents a higher score.
Final Score: 12 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility
Basis: Gold Supplier status is True, Gold Supplier duration is 1 year, Trade Assurance is True, and tags include ODM service available, Full customization, Minor customization, and Response time ≤2h.
Elaboration: The supplier has several core platform credibility indicators, including Gold Supplier membership and Trade Assurance support. However, the Gold Supplier history is short at only 1 year. The listed service tags are useful, but no independent product certifications, compliance certificates, or detailed factory audit documents are provided in the supplied data.
Scoring Rationale: Core platform credibility is present, but the short Gold Supplier duration limits long-term trust validation. The supplier has a reasonable platform foundation, yet the absence of broader certification evidence means it cannot be rated as a highly mature or fully proven compliance profile.
Final Score: 15 / 20

3. Business Performance
Basis: Past six-month orders are 20+, transaction value is CN¥54K+, store rating is 4.5, and review count is 2.
Elaboration: The supplier has recorded recent transactions, which indicates active business activity on the platform. However, both order volume and transaction value are relatively limited, and the review count is very small. The 4.5 rating is acceptable, but with only 2 reviews, the rating has limited statistical reliability.
Scoring Rationale: The business record shows market validation, but not at a high-volume level. The low number of reviews weakens confidence in repeatable customer satisfaction. This supports a score in the lower-to-middle range rather than a strong commercial performance rating.
Final Score: 12 / 20

4. Service Capability
Basis: Communication response time is ≤2h, and platform tags include Full customization, Minor customization, and ODM service available.
Elaboration: The supplier demonstrates a solid service profile for buyers needing customization. Response time within two hours is efficient, though it does not meet the strongest benchmark of ≤1 hour. The presence of full customization and ODM service suggests the supplier can support more than standard catalog purchasing.
Scoring Rationale: Service capability is above basic level because customization options are clearly listed and response speed is reasonably fast. Since response time is not within one hour, the supplier does not reach the highest service tier.
Final Score: 8 / 10

5. Delivery Performance
Basis: On-time shipping rate is 100.0%.
Elaboration: The reported delivery performance is excellent based on the provided metric. A 100.0% on-time shipping rate indicates that the supplier has met delivery commitments within the measured platform data.
Scoring Rationale: According to the scoring standard, an on-time shipping rate above 90% qualifies for 9–10 points. Since the provided rate is 100.0%, the supplier receives the maximum score for this dimension.
Final Score: 10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback
Basis: Store rating is 4.5, review count is 2, supplier verification is marked True, and Finished Product Inspection information is not provided.
Elaboration: The 4.5 rating is positive, but the very low review count limits confidence in the consistency of customer feedback. Supplier verification provides some quality assurance background, but there is insufficient data on finished product inspection, detailed QC procedures, inspection reports, defect rates, or product certifications.
Scoring Rationale: The supplier has basic quality credibility through rating and verification, but customer feedback volume is too limited to support a high score. The absence of Finished Product Inspection data should be treated as Insufficient Data rather than assumed to exist.
Final Score: 14 / 20

Total Score: 71 / 100

Procurement Recommendation
Cooperation is conditionally recommended for small-batch procurement, customized fan products, promotional items, craft retail sourcing, and buyers who value low MOQs and flexible customization. The supplier is not yet strongly proven for large-scale or high-risk procurement due to limited factory scale, short Gold Supplier history, modest transaction volume, and only 2 customer reviews. Key risks include limited public quality feedback, insufficient Finished Product Inspection data, and lack of detailed production capacity information. Growth potential exists if the supplier continues improving transaction volume, review base, certification transparency, and quality assurance documentation.