Keerte Electric Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Supplier Evaluation Report: Keerte Electric Technology Co., Ltd.

Executive Summary

Keerte Electric Technology Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Zhejiang, offering electrical connector and terminal-related products such as insulated tubular terminals, ferrule bootlace pin terminals, ring terminals, non-insulated electrical connectors, and copper cable terminals. Based on the provided data, the company has a moderate production foundation, with a factory area of over 3,000㎡ and more than 60 staff, supported by verified supplier status. On , the supplier shows credible platform backing, including 5 years as a Gold Supplier and Trade Assurance support. Its recent business activity is moderate, with 40+ orders and CN¥135.2K+ transaction value in the past six months. The store rating is strong at 5.0, but the review count is limited at 8, which restricts the depth of customer feedback validation. This supplier appears suitable for buyers seeking small to medium-volume procurement of electrical terminal components, especially where platform protection and relatively reliable delivery are important.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis

• Factory location: Zhejiang, China
• Factory area: 3,000+㎡
• Employee count: 60+ staff
• Verified supplier / factory audit status: True

Elaboration

Keerte Electric Technology Co., Ltd. demonstrates a defined manufacturing base with more than 3,000㎡ of factory space and over 60 employees. This indicates that the company is not merely a trading entity based on the provided data, but has a measurable operational and staffing foundation. The verified supplier status further strengthens its company profile, as it suggests that certain business or factory information has undergone platform-related verification.

However, the available data does not include detailed production capacity, number of production lines, machinery configuration, annual output, quality lab capability, or major factory certifications. Therefore, while the company shows basic to moderate manufacturing capability, the data is insufficient to classify it as a large-scale or highly industrialized supplier.

Scoring Rationale

The factory size and workforce suggest a small-to-medium manufacturing operation with stable basic production capability. The verified supplier status adds credibility and reduces the concern that the supplier lacks a physical operational base. However, the absence of detailed production scale indicators and formal factory certification information limits the score from reaching the high-performance range. The supplier fits best into the “medium stable factory” range rather than a large-scale supply chain operator.

Final Score

15 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis

• Gold Supplier: True
• Gold Supplier duration: 5 years
• Trade Assurance: True
• Verified supplier status: True
• Certification / industry labels provided: “Response time ≤2h”
• Other compliance certifications: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier has maintained Gold Supplier status for 5 years, which provides a meaningful level of platform history and continuity. Trade Assurance support is also an important procurement protection mechanism, particularly for overseas or remote buyers who require transaction security. The verified supplier status further supports platform credibility.

However, the certification and industry label data is limited. The only label provided is related to response time, not product compliance, production certification, quality management certification, or industry-specific approval. There is no provided evidence of ISO certification, product safety certification, environmental compliance, or electrical component compliance standards. Therefore, the supplier has strong platform credibility but limited documented compliance depth.

Scoring Rationale

A 5-year Gold Supplier record, Trade Assurance support, and verified supplier status form a solid credibility profile. These factors make the supplier more reliable than vendors without platform backing. However, because the provided certification label information is incomplete and does not include technical or industry compliance certifications, the supplier cannot be scored in the highest tier. The supplier has credible platform support, but compliance documentation requires further confirmation before high-risk or regulated procurement.

Final Score

17 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis

• Orders in past 6 months: 40+
• Transaction value in past 6 months: CN¥135.2K+
• Store rating: 5.0
• Number of reviews: 8

Elaboration

The supplier has recorded over 40 orders in the past six months, indicating active commercial engagement on the platform. The transaction value of CN¥135.2K+ suggests a functioning sales pipeline, though the scale is moderate rather than high-volume. The 5.0 store rating is positive, but the review count of 8 is relatively small, meaning the rating is based on a limited customer feedback base.

The available data supports the conclusion that the supplier has real transaction activity and some buyer acceptance. However, the transaction scale and review volume are not sufficient to demonstrate strong market penetration or large-scale commercial validation.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier’s recent order count and transaction value show stable but moderate business activity. The perfect 5.0 rating is favorable, but the limited number of reviews reduces confidence in the statistical reliability of the rating. Compared with suppliers showing high order volume, high transaction value, and large numbers of reviews, Keerte Electric Technology Co., Ltd. appears commercially active but not yet strongly validated at scale.

Final Score

14 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis

• Communication response time: ≤2h
• Platform label: “Response time ≤2h”
• Full Customization support: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier shows a response time of less than or equal to 2 hours, which indicates a relatively responsive communication process. This is useful for buyers who require quotation clarification, order coordination, product selection, or after-sales communication. The same response-time capability is also reflected in the platform label.

However, the provided data does not state whether the supplier supports Full Customization, OEM, ODM, private labeling, drawing-based production, packaging customization, or engineering modification. As customization capability is a key factor in service capability scoring, the absence of this information limits the evaluation.

Scoring Rationale

The response speed is acceptable and commercially practical, but it does not meet the strongest category of ≤1 hour response. More importantly, customization capability is not confirmed. Therefore, the supplier can be considered to have normal communication efficiency, but there is insufficient evidence to rate it as a highly service-oriented or strongly customized supplier.

Final Score

7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis

• On-time dispatch rate: 96.8%

Elaboration

The supplier’s on-time dispatch rate of 96.8% is a strong indicator of delivery discipline. According to the scoring standard, a rate above 90% qualifies for the highest scoring range. This level of performance suggests that the supplier is generally capable of meeting dispatch commitments and maintaining order execution reliability.

The provided data does not include average lead time, late shipment reasons, logistics modes, or performance by product category. Therefore, the evaluation is based strictly on the stated on-time dispatch rate.

Scoring Rationale

A 96.8% on-time dispatch rate is clearly above the 90% benchmark and supports a strong delivery score. While the lack of detailed lead-time data prevents a more comprehensive logistics assessment, the available delivery performance metric is positive and indicates low dispatch-delay risk.

Final Score

9 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis

• Store rating: 5.0
• Review count: 8
• Verified supplier / factory audit status: True
• Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
• Factory Verification: True, based on provided verified supplier status

Elaboration

The supplier has a 5.0 store rating, which is a positive quality and service signal. However, the number of reviews is only 8, which limits the strength of the customer feedback base. A high rating with a small review count should be interpreted cautiously, as it does not provide broad evidence of consistent quality across many buyers or repeated transactions.

The verified supplier status supports the basic credibility of the company, but the provided data does not confirm Finished Product Inspection, formal quality control procedures, product testing systems, or quality certifications. As a result, the supplier shows positive but incomplete quality assurance evidence.

Scoring Rationale

The 5.0 rating is favorable, and verified supplier status provides a baseline level of quality-related confidence. However, the limited review count and lack of confirmed Finished Product Inspection prevent the supplier from being classified as having a fully mature quality assurance system. The score reflects good early feedback but insufficient depth of quality validation.

Final Score

15 / 20

Total Score

Procurement Recommendation

Recommendation: Recommended for conditional cooperation.

Keerte Electric Technology Co., Ltd. is suitable for buyers seeking small to medium-volume procurement of electrical connectors, insulated terminals, ring terminals, ferrule terminals, and copper cable terminal products, based strictly on the product categories provided. The supplier has a credible profile, including 5 years as a Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance support, verified supplier status, and a strong on-time dispatch rate of 96.8%.

The main risks are the limited review base, moderate transaction scale, and insufficient data regarding Finished Product Inspection, formal quality certifications, customization capability, and detailed production capacity. For first-time cooperation, buyers should consider starting with sample orders or controlled trial orders before scaling up procurement volume.

The supplier’s growth potential appears positive due to its verified factory base, active platform transactions, strong rating, and reliable delivery record. However, further due diligence is recommended on quality control processes, product compliance requirements, and customization capability before placing large or technically demanding orders.