zemez1039

Phones: 800
    • Shopping Cart
    • Checkout
News Top
  • Company Center
  • Featured Companies
  • Newest Companies
  • Recommended Companies

Mayang Senjia Luggage Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

10.07.26 0 Comments Posted by

Executive Summary

Mayang Senjia Luggage Co., Ltd. is a China-based bag and backpack supplier located in Hunan, with a reported factory area of 9,500+ ㎡ and 220+ staff. Based on the provided data, the supplier shows a solid mid-scale production foundation, supported by supplier verification, Gold Supplier status for 2 years, Trade Assurance, Finished Product Inspection, and a strong on-time delivery rate of 97.6%. Its recent platform performance is commercially meaningful, with 2,000+ orders and CN¥1.6M+ transaction value over the past six months, alongside a 4.6 store rating and 400+ reviews. The supplier appears suitable for buyers seeking children’s backpacks, cartoon backpack sets, PU leather bags, and casual women’s bags at wholesale price levels. However, Full Customization capability, MOQ details, and broader certification information are not provided and should be verified before placing large or highly customized orders.

Mayang Senjia Luggage Co., Ltd.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis

  • Company: Mayang Senjia Luggage Co., Ltd.
  • Country/Region: China, Hunan Province
  • Factory area: 9,500+ ㎡
  • Employees: 220+ staff
  • Verified supplier / factory audit status: True

Elaboration

The supplier has a clearly stated physical production base with 9,500+ ㎡ of factory space and 220+ employees. This indicates a production setup beyond small workshop scale and suggests the company has the manpower and facility size to support recurring wholesale orders. The verified supplier status provides additional credibility regarding the existence and basic legitimacy of the supplier’s production operation.

However, the data does not include detailed production lines, monthly output capacity, machinery list, production lead time, or factory certification names. Therefore, while the supplier can be assessed as having a stable mid-scale manufacturing base, there is insufficient data to classify it as a large-scale supply chain manufacturer.

Scoring Rationale

The factory size and employee count support a medium-level production capability. The presence of supplier verification strengthens confidence in the supplier’s operating foundation. However, the absence of detailed capacity indicators and named factory certifications limits the score from reaching the highest range. Based on the scoring standard, this fits the “medium stable factory” category.

Final Score

16 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis

  • Gold Supplier: True
  • Gold Supplier duration: 2 years
  • Trade Assurance: True
  • Supplier verification / factory audit: True
  • Certification / platform tags:
  • Warranty available
  • Finished product inspection
  • On-time delivery 97.6%
  • Response time ≤1h

Elaboration

The supplier has several important platform credibility indicators, including Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance support, and supplier verification. These are meaningful signals for international buyers because they reduce basic transaction risk and provide some level of platform-backed order protection.

The supplier also carries operational tags such as Finished Product Inspection, Warranty available, fast response time, and on-time delivery performance. These enhance platform credibility and suggest the supplier is actively managed on the platform.

However, the Gold Supplier duration is only 2 years, which is relatively short compared with long-established suppliers. In addition, no third-party product certifications, management system certifications, or detailed audit reports are provided in the dataset. Therefore, compliance credibility is solid but not yet at the highest maturity level.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has core trust mechanisms in place: Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance, and verification. The certification/tag profile is relatively complete at platform level, but the short 2-year Gold Supplier history and lack of detailed external certifications prevent a top-tier score. This aligns with the range for suppliers with core certification elements but shorter platform history.

Final Score

16 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis

  • Orders in the past 6 months: 2,000+
  • Transaction value in the past 6 months: CN¥1.6M+
  • Store rating: 4.6
  • Number of reviews: 400+

Elaboration

The supplier shows strong recent commercial activity on the platform. More than 2,000 orders within six months indicates active demand and frequent transaction flow. CN¥1.6M+ in transaction value further supports that the supplier is not merely listed on the platform but has measurable sales conversion.

The store rating of 4.6 is positive, and 400+ reviews provide a reasonable customer feedback base. This level of review volume gives more confidence than suppliers with very limited buyer history. However, while the order count is high, the average transaction value cannot be accurately calculated from the provided data because order-level pricing and quantities are not available.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier demonstrates high order activity, meaningful sales value, a positive rating, and a substantial review count. These factors together indicate strong commercial validation. The score is kept slightly below perfect because the rating is good but not exceptionally high, and the data does not provide detailed repeat-buyer rate, dispute rate, or buyer geography.

Final Score

18 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis

  • Communication response time: ≤1h
  • Full Customization: Insufficient Data
  • Product data includes one listing title mentioning “Custom Logo,” but no explicit Full Customization capability is provided.

Elaboration

The supplier’s response time of ≤1 hour is a strong service indicator. Fast response is especially important for international procurement, sample confirmation, quotation adjustment, and issue resolution during production.

However, the dataset does not explicitly confirm Full Customization capability. Although one product title includes “Custom Logo,” this alone is not sufficient to verify full customization services such as private mold development, material customization, color customization, structural modification, packaging customization, or OEM/ODM depth. Therefore, customization capability must be marked as Insufficient Data.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier qualifies strongly on response efficiency due to the ≤1h response time. However, because Full Customization is not confirmed, the supplier cannot be placed in the 9–10 range, which requires both fast response and strong customization capability. The appropriate score reflects strong communication but incomplete evidence on customization.

Final Score

8 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis

  • On-time delivery rate: 97.6%

Elaboration

The supplier’s reported on-time delivery rate of 97.6% is a strong operational indicator. According to the scoring standard, any on-time delivery rate above 90% falls into the 9–10 point range. A 97.6% rate suggests reliable fulfillment performance on recorded platform orders.

This is particularly relevant for buyers managing seasonal products, school bags, promotional bags, or retail replenishment cycles where late shipment can cause inventory and sales losses.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier significantly exceeds the 90% benchmark for top delivery performance. Based strictly on the provided data, the delivery score should be placed at the highest level. No negative delivery data is provided.

Final Score

10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis

  • Store rating: 4.6
  • Reviews: 400+
  • Finished Product Inspection: True / listed as platform tag
  • Supplier verification / factory audit: True
  • Warranty available: listed as platform tag

Elaboration

The supplier has a 4.6 store rating and 400+ reviews, which indicates a meaningful customer feedback base. The review volume is sufficient to provide better confidence than suppliers with only a small number of evaluations. Finished Product Inspection is also listed, which supports the presence of basic outgoing quality control.

The supplier verification status further improves quality confidence because it suggests the supplier has undergone some form of platform verification. Warranty availability also provides a post-sale service signal, although the specific warranty terms are not provided.

However, the data does not include defect rate, inspection reports, product test certificates, material compliance certifications, or detailed quality management system information. Therefore, the supplier shows good quality indicators but cannot be rated as fully comprehensive from a quality assurance perspective.

Scoring Rationale

The combination of a good rating, 400+ reviews, Finished Product Inspection, warranty availability, and verification supports a strong quality and feedback score. The score is not placed at the absolute maximum because the rating is 4.6 rather than extremely high, and detailed technical quality documentation is not available.

Final Score

18 / 20

Total Score

Dimension Score
Company Strength 16 / 20
Platform & Compliance Credibility 16 / 20
Business Performance 18 / 20
Service Capability 8 / 10
Delivery Performance 10 / 10
Quality & Customer Feedback 18 / 20
Total Score 86 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Recommendation: Recommended for cooperation, especially for standard wholesale and platform-verified bag/backpack procurement.

Mayang Senjia Luggage Co., Ltd. is suitable for buyers looking for children’s backpacks, cartoon backpack sets, PU leather bags, and casual women’s bags based on the listed product information. The supplier is particularly appropriate for customers who value fast communication, strong delivery reliability, Trade Assurance support, and existing transaction history.

Suitable Customer Types

  • Small to medium-sized wholesalers
  • E-commerce sellers sourcing ready-made bag products
  • Retailers requiring stable delivery performance
  • Buyers seeking suppliers with Trade Assurance and verified supplier status
  • Customers purchasing standard or lightly branded bag products, subject to confirmation of customization details

Main Risk Points

  • Full Customization capability: Insufficient Data
  • MOQ information: Insufficient Data, as the provided MOQ field is shown as “p_str”
  • No detailed production capacity data such as monthly output, production lines, or machinery list
  • No named third-party product certifications or quality management certifications provided
  • Warranty is listed, but warranty scope and terms are not specified

Growth Potential

The supplier shows strong platform activity, high recent order volume, fast response, and excellent on-time delivery performance. With more years of Gold Supplier history, clearer customization capability, and additional quality or compliance documentation, the supplier could move closer to a top-tier procurement profile.

  • Comments

Comments

Leave your comment
Cancel reply

Note: HTML is not translated!

Submit comment

Most popular Blog

Kwinpack Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Kwinpack Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foodmate Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foodmate Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Medsinglong Co Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Medsinglong Co Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Metallics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Metallics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Medsinglong Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Medsinglong Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Gauss (Jiaxing) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Gauss (Jiaxing) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Bescanled Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Bescanled Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Beijing Shipuller Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Beijing Shipuller Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Whale Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Whale Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zouping Beautex Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zouping Beautex Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ruitian Cable Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ruitian Cable Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
New Powerful Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
New Powerful Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Monro M&E Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Monro M&E Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Blueendless Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Blueendless Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Postek Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Postek Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Kaer Technology Co.,Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Kaer Technology Co.,Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang J&J Mobility Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang J&J Mobility Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Tianck Medical Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Tianck Medical Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hochey Medical Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hochey Medical Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Clientop Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Clientop Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Blog You May Like

Shanghai Shanghua Fluoro Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Shanghua Fluoro Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingdao Yiguanlin Steel Structure Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingdao Yiguanlin Steel Structure Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Yihua Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Yihua Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhengzhou Fuch Clothes Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhengzhou Fuch Clothes Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Everich Commerce Group Limited Supplier Evaluation
Everich Commerce Group Limited Supplier Evaluation
Quanzhou Baohong Kitchen And Bathroom Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Quanzhou Baohong Kitchen And Bathroom Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Caifull Precision Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Caifull Precision Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Qiaolan Environmental Protection Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Qiaolan Environmental Protection Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Beijing Yutoo Construction And Development Co.,Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Beijing Yutoo Construction And Development Co.,Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Henan Haoquwei Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Henan Haoquwei Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Voten Medical Technology Co.,Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Voten Medical Technology Co.,Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Huizhou Honesty Technology Co., Limited Supplier Evaluation
Huizhou Honesty Technology Co., Limited Supplier Evaluation
Landztop Technology Co., Limited Supplier Evaluation
Landztop Technology Co., Limited Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Yingda Gift Packaging Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Yingda Gift Packaging Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wenling Bairan Mechanical Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wenling Bairan Mechanical Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Oyg New Building Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Oyg New Building Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wuhan Kerousi Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wuhan Kerousi Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Henglicai Building Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Henglicai Building Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yongkang Suoren Electric Appliances Co.,Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Yongkang Suoren Electric Appliances Co.,Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Bidisco Electric Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Bidisco Electric Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Information

  • About Us

Store Info

Address:
4578 Marmora Road, Glasgow, D04 89GR
Phones:
800
We are open:

E-mail: kimibetters@gmail.com

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

Get all the latest information on Events, Sales and Offers. Sign up for newsletter today.

Powered By News Top © 2026