zemez1039

Phones: 800
    • Shopping Cart
    • Checkout
News Top
  • Company Center
  • Featured Companies
  • Newest Companies
  • Recommended Companies

Pegatec Abrasives Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

11.07.26 0 Comments Posted by

Executive Summary

Pegatec Abrasives Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Zhejiang, offering abrasive products including cutting wheels, grinding discs, flap abrasives, and sanding products. Based on the provided data, the company appears to have a small-to-medium production profile, with a factory area of over 2,100 m² and more than 80 staff. Its supplier credibility is supported by 5 years as an Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance availability, verified supplier status, and platform tags such as Finished Product Inspection, ODM service, Warranty available, and Full customization. Commercial performance shows some transaction activity, with 10+ orders and CN¥270.4K+ transaction value over the past six months, but the absence of a store rating and 0 customer reviews limits buyer-side validation. Delivery performance is moderate, with a 78.6% on-time dispatch rate. Overall, Pegatec may be suitable for buyers seeking abrasive products with customization support, but buyers should carefully verify quality consistency, delivery reliability, and customer reference availability before scaling orders.

Pegatec Abrasives Co., Ltd.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis
- Factory location: Zhejiang, China
- Factory area: 2,100+ m²
- Employees: 80+ staff
- Verified supplier: True

Elaboration
Pegatec Abrasives Co., Ltd. has a documented physical production base with more than 2,100 m² of factory space and over 80 employees. This indicates that the company has a real operating structure and basic manufacturing capacity. The verified supplier status further supports the existence and credibility of its factory operations.

However, the provided factory size and employee count do not indicate a large-scale industrial operation. The company appears more aligned with a small-to-medium manufacturing supplier rather than a large-scale mass-production enterprise. There is no additional data on production lines, monthly output, equipment capacity, export volume, or factory audit details beyond the verified supplier indicator.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier demonstrates basic-to-moderate production strength through factory area, staff size, and verification status. The 80+ staff and 2,100+ m² factory area suggest the ability to support regular production, but the scale is not large enough to justify a top-tier score. Since factory verification is present, the supplier should not be rated as weak, but the absence of detailed production capacity data limits confidence in large-volume supply capability.

Final Score
14 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier duration: 5 years
- Trade Assurance: True
- Verification status: Verified supplier
- Certification / industry tags: Warranty available, Finished product inspection, ODM service available, Full customization

Elaboration
The supplier has a relatively solid platform credibility profile. A 5-year Gold Supplier history indicates an established presence on the platform rather than a newly listed supplier. Trade Assurance availability provides additional transaction protection for buyers. The verified supplier status and platform tags further strengthen its credibility.

The presence of Finished Product Inspection and Warranty available tags suggests that the supplier has some quality-related and after-sales support mechanisms listed on the platform. ODM service and Full customization also indicate that the supplier may be positioned to serve buyers with product adaptation or branding needs. However, no independent certification names, audit reports, or specific compliance standards are provided in the data.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier has most core platform credibility indicators: Gold Supplier status, 5-year platform history, Trade Assurance, verified supplier status, and multiple service/quality-related tags. This supports a strong credibility score. The score is not maximized because the data does not include specific third-party certifications, detailed factory audit results, or named industry compliance documents.

Final Score
18 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis
- Orders in past 6 months: 10+
- Transaction value in past 6 months: CN¥270.4K+
- Store rating: Insufficient Data
- Number of reviews: 0

Elaboration
The supplier has recorded commercial activity on the platform, with more than 10 orders and over CN¥270.4K in transaction value during the past six months. This indicates that buyers have placed orders recently and that the supplier is not commercially inactive.

However, the order count is relatively limited, and the absence of a store rating makes it difficult to assess buyer satisfaction. The review count is 0, which significantly limits transparency around customer experience, product quality feedback, communication performance, and post-delivery satisfaction. While the transaction amount is meaningful, the lack of review-based validation reduces confidence in repeatability and market acceptance.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier shows measurable transaction activity, so it should not be classified as commercially unverified. However, 10+ orders over six months is not high, and the lack of store rating and 0 reviews create a clear information gap. The business performance is therefore assessed as low-to-moderate rather than strong.

Final Score
12 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis
- Response time: ≤4h
- Full customization: Available
- ODM service: Available

Elaboration
The supplier provides a response time of no more than 4 hours, which indicates acceptable communication responsiveness for general sourcing communication. The availability of Full customization and ODM service suggests that the supplier can support buyers requiring customized abrasive products, branding, or specification adjustments, based strictly on the provided platform tags.

However, the response time does not reach the strongest service benchmark of within 1 hour. There is also no data on account manager support, language capability, sample lead time, design support, or after-sales response process.

Scoring Rationale
Pegatec demonstrates reasonable service capability through a ≤4h response time and customization-related tags. This supports a mid-to-good service score. The score is not higher because the response speed is not within the strongest range, and service depth beyond customization availability is not documented.

Final Score
7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis
- On-time dispatch rate: 78.6%

Elaboration
The supplier’s on-time dispatch rate is 78.6%, which falls within the 70%–79% range. This indicates that delivery reliability is moderate but not strong. For procurement buyers, especially those managing replenishment cycles, project deadlines, or retail inventory planning, this level of on-time dispatch may require additional delivery monitoring.

No further information is provided on average lead time, logistics partners, production scheduling, urgent order capability, or historical delay reasons. Therefore, the assessment is limited to the stated on-time dispatch percentage.

Scoring Rationale
According to the scoring framework, an on-time dispatch rate between 70% and 79% corresponds to 5–6 points. Since 78.6% is near the upper end of this range, the supplier receives the higher score within this band. Nevertheless, it remains below the 80% threshold required for stronger delivery performance.

Final Score
6 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis
- Store rating: Insufficient Data
- Number of reviews: 0
- Finished Product Inspection: Available
- Verified supplier: True
- Warranty available: Listed

Elaboration
The supplier has some quality assurance indicators, including Finished Product Inspection, Warranty available, and verified supplier status. These are positive signs that the supplier presents quality-related controls and buyer support mechanisms on the platform.

However, the customer feedback side is weak due to the absence of a store rating and 0 reviews. This makes it difficult to verify actual buyer satisfaction, consistency of product quality, complaint handling, or long-term reliability. For abrasive products, where safety, durability, and performance consistency are important, the lack of customer review evidence is a notable limitation.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier should receive credit for Finished Product Inspection, warranty availability, and verification status. However, quality scoring is heavily constrained by the lack of store rating and customer reviews. The supplier has basic quality assurance signals but insufficient customer feedback validation, placing it in the lower-middle range.

Final Score
12 / 20

Total Score

Total Score: 69 / 100

  • Company Strength: 14 / 20
  • Platform & Compliance Credibility: 18 / 20
  • Business Performance: 12 / 20
  • Service Capability: 7 / 10
  • Delivery Performance: 6 / 10
  • Quality & Customer Feedback: 12 / 20

Procurement Recommendation

Pegatec Abrasives Co., Ltd. can be considered for conditional cooperation, especially for buyers sourcing abrasive products such as cutting wheels, grinding discs, flap abrasives, and sanding products. The supplier is more suitable for small-to-medium buyers, trial orders, customized product inquiries, and buyers who value Trade Assurance and platform verification.

The main strengths are its verified supplier status, 5-year Gold Supplier history, Trade Assurance support, Finished Product Inspection tag, warranty availability, ODM service, and Full customization capability. These factors provide a reasonable credibility foundation.

The main risks are limited customer feedback, 0 reviews, missing store rating, moderate recent order volume, and a 78.6% on-time dispatch rate. These gaps mean buyers should avoid immediate large-scale procurement without further validation.

Recommended procurement approach: start with sample orders or small trial batches, confirm product performance specifications, request inspection records where available, clarify delivery lead times in writing, and use Trade Assurance for initial transactions. Growth potential exists if the supplier can improve delivery reliability and accumulate verified customer reviews over time.

  • Comments

Comments

Leave your comment
Cancel reply

Note: HTML is not translated!

Submit comment

Most popular Blog

Winking Abrasives Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Winking Abrasives Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Jiuding Abrasives Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Jiuding Abrasives Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Fermi Abrasives Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Fermi Abrasives Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jia County Yihong Abrasives Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jia County Yihong Abrasives Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Kwinpack Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Kwinpack Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foodmate Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foodmate Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Medsinglong Co Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Medsinglong Co Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Metallics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Metallics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Medsinglong Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Medsinglong Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Gauss (Jiaxing) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Gauss (Jiaxing) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Bescanled Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Bescanled Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Beijing Shipuller Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Beijing Shipuller Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Whale Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Whale Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zouping Beautex Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zouping Beautex Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ruitian Cable Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ruitian Cable Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
New Powerful Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
New Powerful Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Monro M&E Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Monro M&E Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Blueendless Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Blueendless Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Postek Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Postek Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Sutai Electrical Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Sutai Electrical Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Blog You May Like

Shandong China Coal Group Co., Ltd. Import & Export Branch Supplier Evaluation
Shandong China Coal Group Co., Ltd. Import & Export Branch Supplier Evaluation
Dongfang Industrial (Guangdong) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongfang Industrial (Guangdong) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anping County Yujun Metal Mesh Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anping County Yujun Metal Mesh Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Hdmann Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Hdmann Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhongshan Lanhua Kitchenware Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhongshan Lanhua Kitchenware Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangmen Jinling Ventilating Fan Manufacture Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangmen Jinling Ventilating Fan Manufacture Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Xiongyihua Plastic Insulation Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Xiongyihua Plastic Insulation Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Beijing Shipuller Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Beijing Shipuller Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Henghui International Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Henghui International Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Client Diesel Engine Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Client Diesel Engine Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Henan Botai Chemical Building Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Henan Botai Chemical Building Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Guangtou Liji Food Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Guangtou Liji Food Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Henan Nanbei Paper Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Henan Nanbei Paper Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Nantong Desihen Precision Tools Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Nantong Desihen Precision Tools Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Fuzhou Eifel Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Fuzhou Eifel Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Huizhou Duncheng Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Huizhou Duncheng Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Infraswin Energy Co.,Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Infraswin Energy Co.,Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Meepss Technology (Dongguan) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Meepss Technology (Dongguan) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hengshui Chiyue Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hengshui Chiyue Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Anxinshi Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Anxinshi Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Information

  • About Us

Store Info

Address:
4578 Marmora Road, Glasgow, D04 89GR
Phones:
800
We are open:

E-mail: kimibetters@gmail.com

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

Get all the latest information on Events, Sales and Offers. Sign up for newsletter today.

Powered By News Top © 2026