Shanghai Easi Computer Technology Corporation Supplier Evaluation

Executive Summary

Shanghai Easi Computer Technology Corporation is a China-based supplier located in Shanghai, offering interactive projection and multi-touch smart interactive products with low minimum order quantities, mostly starting from 1 set. Based on the provided data, the company appears to be a small-scale supplier in terms of factory size and workforce, with a reported factory area of 610+㎡ and 10+ staff. However, it has meaningful platform credibility, including 16 years as an Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance support, verified supplier status, and listed quality-related tags such as Finished Product Inspection and warranty availability. Its recent business activity is moderate, with 100+ orders and CN¥1.4M+ transaction value over the past six months, supported by a strong 4.9 store rating but a limited review base of 10+ reviews. This supplier is most suitable for buyers seeking small-batch procurement, trial orders, customization-friendly sourcing, or interactive education/display solutions, while larger-volume buyers should further verify production capacity and quality consistency.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis
- Factory location: Shanghai, China
- Factory area: 610+㎡
- Employees: 10+ staff
- Verified supplier: True

Elaboration
The supplier has a clearly stated physical operating base in Shanghai and provides basic factory-scale information. The factory area of 610+㎡ and 10+ employees indicate a relatively small production or assembly operation rather than a large-scale manufacturing facility. The presence of verified supplier status improves confidence that the company has undergone some form of supplier verification, but the provided data does not include detailed factory audit reports, production line quantity, monthly output, machinery list, or capacity utilization.

Scoring Rationale
The company demonstrates basic production capability and has verified supplier status, which supports a minimum level of operational credibility. However, the factory size and staff count are limited, placing it below a medium-sized stable factory profile. Because there is no provided evidence of large production scale, multiple production lines, or extensive workforce, the score should remain in the “small but basic production capability” range.

Final Score: 12 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier duration: 16 years
- Trade Assurance: True
- Supplier verification: True
- Certification / industry tags: Warranty available, Low MOQ for customization, Finished product inspection

Elaboration
The supplier has strong platform history, with 16 years as a Gold Supplier. It also supports Trade Assurance, which provides transactional protection for buyers on the platform. The verified supplier status and listed tags, especially Finished Product Inspection and warranty availability, strengthen its compliance and platform credibility. However, the provided information does not include internationally recognized management or product certifications such as ISO, CE, FCC, RoHS, or other third-party compliance documents; therefore, certification completeness cannot be considered fully comprehensive.

Scoring Rationale
A 16-year Gold Supplier record combined with Trade Assurance and verification represents a strong platform trust profile. The supplier has more than basic platform credibility and shows several buyer-protection features. The score is not maximized because the provided data lacks detailed formal certification documents beyond platform and industry tags.

Final Score: 18 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis
- Orders in the past six months: 100+
- Transaction value in the past six months: CN¥1.4M+
- Store rating: 4.9
- Reviews: 10+

Elaboration
The supplier has recorded commercial activity over the last six months, with more than 100 orders and CN¥1.4M+ in transaction value. This suggests stable platform-based trading activity. The 4.9 store rating is strong, but the review count of 10+ is relatively limited, meaning the rating is supported by a smaller visible customer feedback base. The transaction value appears moderate rather than high, particularly when assessed alongside the product pricing range and order volume.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier shows real transaction history and a good store rating, which supports confidence in its business activity. However, the review volume is not large, and the available data does not demonstrate very high order volume or very high transaction value. This places the supplier in the stable medium-to-moderate performance range rather than the top performance tier.

Final Score: 15 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis
- Communication response time: ≤1h
- Customization-related tag: Low MOQ for customization
- Product listing includes OEM ODM interactive product type

Elaboration
The supplier reports a response time of less than or equal to one hour, indicating strong communication efficiency. The platform tag “Low MOQ for customization” suggests that the supplier supports customization at relatively accessible order quantities. One listed product also includes OEM ODM in its product description, indicating customization positioning within the product offering. However, the provided data does not explicitly confirm “Full Customization,” nor does it provide detailed customization processes, engineering support, sample lead times, or design capabilities.

Scoring Rationale
The response time meets the highest service-response standard, and customization support is indicated through the low-MOQ customization tag and OEM/ODM product wording. Still, because Full Customization is not explicitly provided in the data, the service capability cannot be scored at the maximum level.

Final Score: 8 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis
- On-time delivery rate: 84.3%

Elaboration
The supplier’s on-time delivery rate is 84.3%, which falls within the 80–89% range. This indicates acceptable but not outstanding delivery reliability. Buyers should expect generally workable delivery performance, but the data does not support classification as a highly reliable logistics performer. No additional information is provided regarding average lead time, urgent order handling, export logistics capability, or historical delay causes.

Scoring Rationale
According to the stated scoring criteria, an on-time shipment rate between 80% and 89% corresponds to 7–8 points. Since 84.3% is in the middle of this range, the supplier receives a balanced score within the band rather than the upper limit.

Final Score: 7 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis
- Store rating: 4.9
- Reviews: 10+
- Finished Product Inspection: Listed
- Supplier verification: True
- Warranty available: Listed

Elaboration
The supplier has a strong store rating of 4.9, which indicates positive visible customer satisfaction. It also lists Finished Product Inspection and warranty availability, both of which are relevant to quality assurance. Supplier verification further supports baseline credibility. However, the review quantity is only 10+, which limits the statistical strength of customer feedback. The provided data does not include defect rates, inspection reports, return records, product test certificates, or detailed quality management system documentation.

Scoring Rationale
The combination of a high rating, Finished Product Inspection, warranty availability, and verification supports a good quality profile. However, the limited review count and absence of deeper quality documentation prevent the supplier from reaching the highest quality tier. The score reflects good but not fully proven quality assurance.

Final Score: 16 / 20

Total Score

76 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Shanghai Easi Computer Technology Corporation is conditionally recommended for cooperation, especially for buyers seeking small-batch purchases, trial orders, low-MOQ customization, or interactive projection and smart touch-related products. Its strongest advantages are long-term platform credibility, Trade Assurance support, fast response time, verified supplier status, and visible quality-related platform tags.

The main risks are its small factory scale, limited staff count, moderate on-time delivery rate of 84.3%, and relatively low review volume of 10+ reviews. For larger-volume or time-sensitive procurement, buyers should request additional verification before placing major orders, including production capacity details, lead time confirmation, product inspection records, and after-sales warranty terms.

Overall, the supplier shows solid platform credibility and acceptable commercial performance, with growth potential in small-to-medium procurement scenarios, but it should be validated further before being used as a core large-scale supply partner.