zemez1039

Phones: 800
    • Shopping Cart
    • Checkout
News Top
  • Company Center
  • Featured Companies
  • Newest Companies
  • Recommended Companies

Shanghai Finice Commodity Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

12.07.26 0 Comments Posted by

Executive Summary

Shanghai Finice Commodity Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Shanghai, with a reported factory area of 11,000+㎡ and 100+ staff. The supplier appears to have a moderate-to-solid production foundation, supported by verified supplier status, 6 years as an Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance, and platform tags including low MOQ for customization, response time ≤4h, and 87.7% on-time delivery. Its listed products are mainly eco-friendly wool dryer ball / reusable laundry-related items, with consistent pricing of CN¥3.12–4.06 and MOQ levels of 6,000 pieces or boxes, indicating suitability for volume-based procurement rather than very small trial orders.

Commercial performance is relatively credible, with 100+ orders and CN¥1.8M+ transaction value over the past six months. However, the shop rating of 4.4 and only 10+ reviews limit the strength of customer-feedback validation. Overall, this supplier is suitable for buyers seeking mid-scale eco-friendly laundry product sourcing with platform-backed transaction protection, while quality validation should be strengthened before larger commitments.

Shanghai Finice Commodity Co., Ltd.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis
- Factory location: Shanghai, China
- Factory area: 11,000+㎡
- Staff size: 100+ staff
- Verified supplier: True

Elaboration
The reported factory area of over 11,000㎡ and workforce of more than 100 staff indicate a supplier with established physical operating capacity rather than a very small trading operation. The presence of verified supplier status provides additional support that the company has passed some form of platform-level supplier verification. However, the data does not include production line count, monthly capacity, equipment details, export volume, or specific factory audit certificates.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier demonstrates a stable medium-scale factory profile, with both factory size and employee count above basic small-factory levels. Verified supplier status strengthens credibility, but the absence of detailed production-capacity data or named factory certifications prevents it from being rated as a top-tier large-scale supply chain.

Final Score
16 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier years: 6 yrs
- Trade Assurance: True
- Verified supplier: True
- Platform tags: “Low MOQ for customization”, “Response time ≤4h”, “On-time delivery 87.7%”

Elaboration
The supplier has a relatively mature platform profile, including 6 years of Gold Supplier history and Trade Assurance support. Verified supplier status further improves transaction confidence. The available tags are useful but mainly platform-performance oriented. No additional compliance certificates, industry-specific certifications, or product safety certifications were provided.

Scoring Rationale
The combination of Gold Supplier status, 6-year platform history, Trade Assurance, and verification supports a strong credibility profile. However, the lack of named compliance certifications or detailed audit documentation means the supplier should not receive a near-perfect score.

Final Score
17 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis
- Past 6-month orders: 100+
- Past 6-month transaction value: CN¥1.8M+
- Shop rating: 4.4
- Review count: 10+

Elaboration
The supplier shows active recent commercial performance, with over 100 orders and more than CN¥1.8M in transaction value within six months. This suggests meaningful buyer activity and a reasonable level of market acceptance. However, the review count is relatively limited at 10+, and the rating of 4.4 is acceptable but not outstanding.

Scoring Rationale
The order quantity and transaction value support a stable medium-level business performance score. The supplier has enough transaction evidence to avoid being considered commercially unproven, but the relatively low review base and moderate rating reduce confidence in broader customer satisfaction consistency.

Final Score
16 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis
- Communication response time: ≤4h
- Platform tag: “Low MOQ for customization”
- Full Customization: Insufficient Data

Elaboration
The supplier’s response time of ≤4h indicates acceptable communication efficiency, although it does not meet the strongest benchmark of ≤1 hour. The “Low MOQ for customization” tag suggests some customization-related service capability, but the data does not confirm whether Full Customization is supported.

Scoring Rationale
Service capability appears adequate for standard sourcing communication and possible basic customization discussions. Because Full Customization is not explicitly confirmed and response time is not within the highest-performance range, the supplier fits the normal-to-good service category rather than the top tier.

Final Score
7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis
- On-time delivery rate: 87.7%

Elaboration
The supplier’s on-time delivery rate of 87.7% falls within the 80–89% range. This indicates generally acceptable logistics execution, but also suggests that delivery reliability is not consistently above the 90% benchmark expected from stronger suppliers.

Scoring Rationale
According to the scoring standard, an on-time delivery rate between 80% and 89% corresponds to 7–8 points. At 87.7%, the supplier is close to the upper end of this band, so a score of 8 is appropriate.

Final Score
8 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis
- Shop rating: 4.4
- Review count: 10+
- Verified supplier: True
- Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
- Factory Verification: Verified supplier status provided, but detailed factory verification scope is Insufficient Data

Elaboration
The supplier has a moderate customer rating of 4.4 and a limited review base of 10+. Verified supplier status provides some quality-related credibility, but the data does not confirm Finished Product Inspection or provide detailed factory verification reports. Therefore, quality assurance cannot be considered fully proven based only on the provided information.

Scoring Rationale
The available feedback is positive enough to indicate basic customer acceptance, but the limited number of reviews weakens statistical confidence. Since Finished Product Inspection is not confirmed and factory verification details are not fully available, the score should remain in the middle range rather than the high-quality-assurance tier.

Final Score
13 / 20

Total Score

77 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Shanghai Finice Commodity Co., Ltd. is recommended for cautious cooperation, especially for buyers seeking mid-scale sourcing of eco-friendly reusable laundry products with Trade Assurance support. The supplier is suitable for importers, wholesalers, private-label buyers, or e-commerce sellers that can meet MOQ levels of 6,000 pieces or boxes.

Key risks include limited review volume, only moderate shop rating, no confirmed Finished Product Inspection data, and insufficient detail on production capacity and factory audit scope. Growth potential is supported by its 6-year Gold Supplier history, verified supplier status, 100+ recent orders, and CN¥1.8M+ recent transaction value. For larger orders, buyers should request product samples, inspection arrangements, and clearer quality-control documentation before committing to bulk procurement.

  • Comments

Comments

Leave your comment
Cancel reply

Note: HTML is not translated!

Submit comment

Most popular Blog

Yiwu Gt Commodity Factory Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Gt Commodity Factory Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Naduo Commodity Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Naduo Commodity Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangxi Kingyuan Commodity Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangxi Kingyuan Commodity Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Yasidan Commodity Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Yasidan Commodity Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Haozhushou Commodity Co.,Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Haozhushou Commodity Co.,Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Yuanlong (Fujian) Commodity Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yuanlong (Fujian) Commodity Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Jutien Commodity Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Jutien Commodity Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Yihoucheng Commodity Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Yihoucheng Commodity Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Qimei Commodity Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Qimei Commodity Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Bunker Commodity Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Bunker Commodity Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhenjiang Hongda Commodity Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhenjiang Hongda Commodity Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wenzhou Fante Commodity Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wenzhou Fante Commodity Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Bestwin Commodity Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Bestwin Commodity Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Imperial Palace Commodity (Dongguan) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Imperial Palace Commodity (Dongguan) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Fuzhou Kinglong Commodity & Cosmetic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Fuzhou Kinglong Commodity & Cosmetic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Huangshan Li Shen Commodity Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Huangshan Li Shen Commodity Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Quanzhou Zhengda Daily Use Commodity Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Quanzhou Zhengda Daily Use Commodity Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai M&G Stationery Inc. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai M&G Stationery Inc. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Pdyear Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Pdyear Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Angsi Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Angsi Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Blog You May Like

Shandong Huaao Engineering Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Huaao Engineering Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Xinhuaxu Rubber Product Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Xinhuaxu Rubber Product Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Senbao Hardware Plastic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Senbao Hardware Plastic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Nanjing Baecheng Jingjie Clothing Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Nanjing Baecheng Jingjie Clothing Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Awind Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Awind Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Aotaier Welding And Cutting Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Aotaier Welding And Cutting Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Henan Danqiu International Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Henan Danqiu International Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Kaibei Food Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Kaibei Food Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Taizhou Dison Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Taizhou Dison Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhengzhou Furui Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhengzhou Furui Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Olbetter Supply Chain Management Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Olbetter Supply Chain Management Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingdao Xinhaoshun Special Vehicle Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingdao Xinhaoshun Special Vehicle Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Liaocheng Youqian Steel Pipe Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Liaocheng Youqian Steel Pipe Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Kangzhun Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Kangzhun Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Leanon Petroleum Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Leanon Petroleum Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Shensheng Building Materials Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Shensheng Building Materials Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Hengyang Import And Export Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Hengyang Import And Export Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Hongya Electric Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Hongya Electric Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Suzhou Alwayz Electric Vehicle Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Suzhou Alwayz Electric Vehicle Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Sunray Power Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Sunray Power Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Information

  • About Us

Store Info

Address:
4578 Marmora Road, Glasgow, D04 89GR
Phones:
800
We are open:

E-mail: kimibetters@gmail.com

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

Get all the latest information on Events, Sales and Offers. Sign up for newsletter today.

Powered By News Top © 2026