Shanxi Chengjiesheng Economic And Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Executive Summary

Shanxi Chengjiesheng Economic And Trade Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Shanxi, with a stated factory area of 200+㎡ and verified supplier status. The supplier appears to focus on packaging-related products such as express bags, bubble wrap, shockproof pearlescent packaging, and related low-MOQ wholesale items. Its platform profile shows 2 years as a Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance support, and capability labels including finished product inspection, ODM service availability, warranty availability, and 3D design capabilities. Commercially, the supplier has recorded 50+ orders and CN¥338K+ transaction value over the past six months, with a 4.7 store rating from 20+ reviews. The supplier is most suitable for buyers seeking small-to-medium-volume packaging procurement with responsive communication and platform-backed transaction protection. However, employee count and detailed production capacity are not provided, so large-scale production reliability cannot be fully confirmed from the available data.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis:
- Factory location: Shanxi, China
- Factory area: 200+㎡
- Employee count: Insufficient Data
- Verified supplier: True

Elaboration:
The supplier has a disclosed factory area and verified supplier status, which provides some baseline confidence in its operational existence. However, the factory area of 200+㎡ indicates a relatively small production footprint compared with larger manufacturing suppliers. The absence of employee count limits the ability to assess labor capacity, production scalability, and operational depth.

Scoring Rationale:
The supplier demonstrates basic production capability and has verification support, but the small factory area and missing employee data prevent it from being assessed as a medium or large-scale stable factory. It is more appropriately positioned as a small supplier with foundational manufacturing or trading capacity.

Final Score: 11/20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis:
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier years: 2 years
- Trade Assurance: True
- Verified supplier: True
- Certification/industry labels: 3D design capabilities, warranty available, finished product inspection, ODM service available

Elaboration:
The supplier has several important platform credibility signals, including Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance support, and verified supplier designation. The certification and capability labels also indicate some structured service and quality-related processes. However, the Gold Supplier history is relatively short at 2 years, which limits the depth of long-term platform credibility.

Scoring Rationale:
Core platform credibility elements are present, including Trade Assurance and supplier verification. The supplier also has relevant capability labels, but the relatively short Gold Supplier period prevents it from reaching the highest credibility tier.

Final Score: 16/20

3. Business Performance

Basis:
- Orders in past 6 months: 50+
- Transaction value in past 6 months: CN¥338K+
- Store rating: 4.7
- Review count: 20+

Elaboration:
The supplier has measurable recent transaction activity, with more than 50 orders and CN¥338K+ in transaction value over six months. This indicates active commercial performance rather than an inactive or unverified storefront. The 4.7 rating is positive, while the 20+ review count provides some buyer feedback but is not yet a large review base.

Scoring Rationale:
The supplier shows stable but not high-volume business performance. Order count and transaction value support a medium-level commercial profile, while the review count remains moderate. The available data supports confidence for regular procurement, but not enough to classify the supplier as a top-tier high-volume performer.

Final Score: 15/20

4. Service Capability

Basis:
- Response time: ≤1h
- Full Customization: Insufficient Data
- ODM service available: Yes, based on platform label

Elaboration:
The supplier’s response time of within one hour is a strong indicator of communication efficiency. The ODM service label suggests some ability to support product development or customization-related requests. However, explicit Full Customization support is not provided in the data, so the supplier’s ability to handle deep customization cannot be fully confirmed.

Scoring Rationale:
Fast response time supports a strong service score, and ODM availability adds value for buyers needing adapted products. However, because Full Customization is not explicitly confirmed, the score should remain below the highest range.

Final Score: 8/10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis:
- On-time delivery rate: 100.0%

Elaboration:
The supplier reports a 100.0% on-time delivery rate, which is the strongest available delivery indicator in the provided data. This suggests that completed transactions have been fulfilled within expected timelines.

Scoring Rationale:
According to the scoring framework, an on-time delivery rate above 90% qualifies for the 9–10 point range. A 100.0% rate supports the maximum score for this dimension.

Final Score: 10/10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis:
- Store rating: 4.7
- Review count: 20+
- Finished product inspection: Yes
- Factory/verified supplier status: True

Elaboration:
The supplier has a good store rating of 4.7 and more than 20 reviews, indicating generally positive customer feedback. The finished product inspection label is a meaningful quality-control indicator, while verified supplier status adds additional credibility. However, the review base is still relatively limited, so the quality record is not yet supported by a large volume of customer feedback.

Scoring Rationale:
The supplier has positive ratings and basic quality assurance indicators, including finished product inspection and verification. The limited number of reviews prevents a top-tier score, but the available quality signals are stronger than minimum baseline expectations.

Final Score: 16/20

Total Score

76/100

Procurement Recommendation

Cooperation is recommended with controlled order sizes, especially for buyers seeking packaging products, express bags, bubble wrap, or related low-to-medium-volume procurement. The supplier is suitable for small and mid-sized buyers that value fast response, Trade Assurance protection, and moderate customization support through ODM capability. Main risks include limited disclosed factory scale, missing employee count, and a relatively small review base. Growth potential exists due to active recent transaction performance, 100.0% on-time delivery, good store rating, and platform-backed quality indicators such as finished product inspection.