Shaoxing Hengyong Packaging Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Executive Summary

Shaoxing Hengyong Packaging Products Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Zhejiang, with a reported factory area of over 2,800㎡ and verified supplier status. The company appears to focus on office, school, stationery, glue tape, and transparent packing tape products, with listed MOQs ranging from 1,000 pieces/rolls to 5,000 pieces/rolls. Its platform profile shows Gold Supplier status for 3 years, Trade Assurance support, response time within 2 hours, and 100.0% on-time delivery. However, several key indicators remain limited or unavailable, including employee count, store rating, customer reviews, and finished product inspection information. Business activity is relatively low, with only 1 order in the past six months, although the transaction value is reported at CN¥135.2K+. Overall, this supplier may be suitable for buyers seeking verified, small-to-medium-scale stationery tape suppliers with basic platform credibility, but additional due diligence is required before large-volume or quality-sensitive procurement.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis
- Factory location: Zhejiang, China
- Factory area: 2,800+㎡
- Employee count: Insufficient Data
- Verified supplier: True

Elaboration
The supplier has a disclosed factory area of more than 2,800㎡, which indicates a physical production base rather than a purely trading-oriented profile. The verified supplier status adds some confidence regarding the existence and basic legitimacy of the company. However, employee count is not provided, making it difficult to fully assess labor capacity, production organization, or scalability.

Scoring Rationale
The factory size suggests basic to moderate production capability, but the absence of employee data limits confidence in operational scale. Since there is verified supplier status and a physical factory area, the company should not be scored as weak. However, the available information does not support classification as a large-scale stable supply chain.

Final Score
14 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier tenure: 3 years
- Trade Assurance: True
- Platform tags: Response time ≤2h; On-time delivery 100.0%
- Factory or supplier verification: Verified supplier marked True

Elaboration
The supplier has several important platform credibility indicators, including Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance support, and verified supplier status. A 3-year Gold Supplier history provides a basic track record, though it is not long enough to be considered highly established. The available certification or industry tags focus mainly on response and delivery performance rather than broader compliance, factory audit depth, or product certification.

Scoring Rationale
Core platform credibility elements are present, especially Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance, and supplier verification. However, the Gold Supplier duration is moderate, and no additional compliance certifications or detailed factory audit documentation are provided. This supports a solid but not top-tier credibility score.

Final Score
16 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis
- Orders in the past 6 months: 1
- Transaction amount in the past 6 months: CN¥135.2K+
- Store rating: Insufficient Data
- Review count: 0

Elaboration
The supplier has recorded transaction activity, with CN¥135.2K+ in transaction value over the past six months. However, the order count is very low at only 1 order, which limits evidence of recurring demand or broad buyer validation. The absence of store rating and the lack of customer reviews make it difficult to evaluate market acceptance or post-transaction buyer satisfaction.

Scoring Rationale
The transaction amount indicates that at least one commercially meaningful order has occurred, but the low order count and zero reviews significantly weaken business performance validation. Without rating data, the supplier cannot be assessed as having strong commercial momentum or proven repeat business.

Final Score
10 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis
- Communication response time: ≤2h
- Full Customization: Insufficient Data
- Communication efficiency: Supported by response-time tag only

Elaboration
The response time of within 2 hours indicates acceptable communication efficiency on the platform. This is positive for initial inquiries, quotation follow-up, and basic supplier communication. However, there is no data confirming Full Customization capability, design support, OEM/ODM service, or dedicated customization workflow.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier demonstrates responsive communication, but the response time does not meet the highest threshold of ≤1 hour. Since customization capability is not provided, the service capability should be considered moderate rather than strong.

Final Score
7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis
- On-time delivery rate: 100.0%

Elaboration
The supplier reports a 100.0% on-time delivery rate, which is the strongest available delivery-related indicator. This suggests reliable fulfillment performance for the orders reflected in the platform data. However, because only 1 order is reported in the past six months, the delivery performance sample size appears limited.

Scoring Rationale
According to the scoring standard, an on-time delivery rate above 90% qualifies for 9–10 points. The supplier reaches 100.0%, but the very low recent order count prevents assigning the absolute maximum score with full confidence.

Final Score
9 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis
- Store rating: Insufficient Data
- Review count: 0
- Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
- Factory Verification / Verified supplier: True

Elaboration
The supplier has verified supplier status, which provides some baseline confidence in company legitimacy. However, customer-facing quality indicators are weak or unavailable. There are no customer reviews, no store rating, and no provided evidence of Finished Product Inspection. This creates a clear limitation for assessing consistency, defect control, and buyer satisfaction.

Scoring Rationale
The verified supplier status provides a basic quality-related reference, but the lack of reviews, rating data, and finished product inspection information prevents a stronger assessment. Quality assurance cannot be considered well validated based on the current data.

Final Score
10 / 20

Total Score

66 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Cooperation is conditionally recommended for small to medium-volume sourcing of office, school, stationery, glue tape, and transparent packing tape products, especially where Trade Assurance and verified supplier status are required. The supplier is more suitable for buyers prioritizing basic platform credibility, responsive communication, and documented on-time delivery.

Main risks include insufficient employee data, no store rating, zero customer reviews, limited recent order count, and no confirmed Finished Product Inspection information. Before placing larger or quality-sensitive orders, buyers should request product samples, quality inspection procedures, production capacity details, and any available factory audit or inspection records.

Growth potential exists due to verified supplier status, 3-year Gold Supplier history, Trade Assurance support, and 100.0% on-time delivery, but broader commercial validation is still limited.