Shaoxing Baixun Hygiene Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Executive Summary

Shaoxing Baixun Hygiene Products Co., Ltd. is a Zhejiang, China-based supplier offering cosmetic and hygiene-related products such as makeup remover items, non-woven deep cleansing products, OEM disposable biodegradable makeup products, and customized logo options. Based on the provided data, the supplier has a modest production foundation with a factory area of over 3,000㎡, more than 30 staff, and verified supplier status. Its platform credibility is relatively strong, supported by 9 years as an Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance, finished product inspection, ODM service availability, and full customization capability. However, its recent business performance appears limited, with only 8 orders and CN¥2K+ transaction value in the past six months, no available store rating, and zero reviews. Delivery performance is acceptable but not outstanding, with an 83.3% on-time shipping rate. This supplier is more suitable for small to medium buyers, trial orders, OEM/ODM customization exploration, and price-sensitive procurement, rather than large-scale buyers requiring strong transaction history and extensive customer feedback.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis:
- Factory location: Zhejiang, China
- Factory area: 3,000+㎡
- Staff size: 30+ staff
- Verified supplier: True

Elaboration:
The supplier has a defined manufacturing base with a factory area exceeding 3,000㎡ and more than 30 employees. This indicates basic in-house production capability, but the scale is relatively limited compared with larger hygiene product manufacturers. The presence of verified supplier status improves confidence in the company’s operational legitimacy.

Scoring Rationale:
The company demonstrates a real production setup and verified supplier status, which supports basic manufacturing reliability. However, the factory size and employee count suggest a small-to-lower-medium scale operation rather than a large-scale supply chain partner. There is insufficient data on production lines, monthly capacity, automation level, or factory audit details.

Final Score: 13 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis:
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier duration: 9 years
- Trade Assurance: True
- Certification/industry tags: Warranty available, Finished product inspection, ODM service available, Full customization

Elaboration:
The supplier has a relatively strong platform profile, especially with 9 years of Gold Supplier history and Trade Assurance support. The listed tags also show a broader platform-backed service and compliance framework, including product inspection and customization-related capabilities.

Scoring Rationale:
A 9-year Gold Supplier record provides a meaningful credibility signal, and Trade Assurance adds transactional protection for buyers. The presence of finished product inspection and customization tags further strengthens compliance visibility. However, the data does not include independent third-party certifications or detailed audit reports beyond the provided platform labels.

Final Score: 18 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis:
- Orders in past 6 months: 8
- Transaction value in past 6 months: CN¥2K+
- Store rating: Insufficient Data
- Review count: 0

Elaboration:
The supplier has recorded recent transactions, but the volume and value are low. Eight orders and CN¥2K+ transaction value over six months indicate limited commercial validation on the platform. The absence of store rating and customer reviews reduces visibility into buyer satisfaction and repeat purchase confidence.

Scoring Rationale:
The supplier has some verified transactional activity, but the available data does not support a conclusion of strong market traction. Low order volume, low transaction value, no rating, and zero reviews make business performance a key weakness. This does not necessarily indicate poor capability, but it limits procurement confidence.

Final Score: 10 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis:
- Response time: ≤6h
- Full customization: Available
- ODM service: Available

Elaboration:
The supplier offers full customization and ODM service, which is relevant for buyers requiring private label, customized logo, or product specification adjustment. The response time of ≤6 hours is acceptable, though it does not reach the highest service benchmark of response within one hour.

Scoring Rationale:
The supplier shows practical service capability through customization and ODM support. Communication speed is reasonable for standard sourcing discussions, but not fast enough to be considered top-tier responsiveness. Based on the available data, service capability is solid but not exceptional.

Final Score: 8 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis:
- On-time shipping rate: 83.3%

Elaboration:
An 83.3% on-time shipping rate indicates that the supplier generally meets delivery schedules, but there is still a measurable risk of shipment delay. For buyers with flexible lead times, this may be acceptable; for time-sensitive retail or promotional orders, the delivery performance requires closer monitoring.

Scoring Rationale:
According to the scoring standard, an on-time shipping rate between 80% and 89% falls into the 7–8 point range. The supplier’s 83.3% rate supports a mid-to-upper score within this band, but it does not qualify for the 9–10 range.

Final Score: 8 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis:
- Store rating: Insufficient Data
- Review count: 0
- Finished product inspection: Available
- Factory verification / verified supplier: True

Elaboration:
The supplier has some quality assurance indicators, including finished product inspection and verified supplier status. However, customer-side quality validation is weak because no store rating is provided and the review count is zero. This makes it difficult to assess actual buyer satisfaction, product consistency, or after-sales performance.

Scoring Rationale:
Finished product inspection and verification provide a basic quality control foundation, but the lack of customer feedback materially limits confidence. With zero reviews and no rating data, the supplier cannot be assessed as having strong market-proven quality performance. The score reflects basic quality assurance presence but insufficient customer validation.

Final Score: 12 / 20

Total Score

Total Score: 69 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Cooperation is conditionally recommended, especially for small to medium buyers, trial orders, OEM/ODM customization projects, and buyers seeking low-MOQ cosmetic or hygiene-related products. The supplier’s main strengths are long-term platform presence, Trade Assurance, finished product inspection, full customization, and verified supplier status. The main risks are low recent transaction volume, CN¥2K+ six-month transaction value, zero reviews, missing store rating, and only moderate on-time delivery performance at 83.3%. Growth potential exists if the supplier can improve transaction volume, collect customer reviews, strengthen delivery consistency, and provide more transparent quality or factory audit documentation.