zemez1039

Phones: 800
    • Shopping Cart
    • Checkout
News Top
  • Company Center
  • Featured Companies
  • Newest Companies
  • Recommended Companies

Hangzhou Edar International Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

12.07.26 0 Comments Posted by

Executive Summary

Hangzhou EDAR International Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Zhejiang, with a reported factory area of over 11,000㎡ and more than 30 staff. Based on the provided product listings, the company supplies pest-control and mosquito-repellent related products, including flyswatters, fly traps, mosquito repellent bracelets, and portable pest-control items. The supplier shows strong platform credibility, supported by 23 years as an Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance availability, verified supplier status, and a 100.0% on-time delivery tag. Commercially, the company has recorded 10+ orders and CN¥2.4M+ transaction value over the past six months, indicating meaningful transaction activity, although the number of reviews is limited at 6. The supplier appears suitable for buyers seeking established platform-backed sourcing, low-to-medium MOQ pest-control products, and reliable delivery performance. Key limitations include insufficient data on full customization capability, finished product inspection, specific factory certifications, and broader customer feedback depth.

Hangzhou EDAR International Co., Ltd.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis
- Factory area: 11,000+㎡
- Employees: 30+ staff
- Verified supplier: True
- Factory certification or audit details: Insufficient Data

Elaboration
The supplier has a relatively sizable factory area, which suggests a physical production or operating base beyond a very small workshop scale. However, the employee count of 30+ indicates a lean workforce rather than a large labor-intensive manufacturing operation. The verified supplier status provides some confidence that the company has passed a platform-level verification process, but the provided data does not specify detailed factory audit standards, production lines, annual capacity, equipment, or recognized factory certifications.

Scoring Rationale
The company demonstrates a moderate operational foundation due to its 11,000+㎡ facility and verified supplier status. However, the limited staff size and lack of disclosed production capacity or factory certification details prevent it from being rated as a large-scale, highly proven supply chain operation. It fits best within the “medium stable factory” range rather than the top tier.

Final Score
16 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier duration: 23 years
- Trade Assurance: True
- Certification / platform tags: Response time ≤7h; On-time delivery 100.0%
- Verified supplier: True

Elaboration
The supplier has a long Gold Supplier history of 23 years, which is a strong platform credibility indicator. Trade Assurance support adds transactional protection for buyers. The presence of operational platform tags, including response time and on-time delivery, further strengthens its profile. The supplier is also marked as verified, although specific third-party certifications or detailed compliance documents are not provided.

Scoring Rationale
A 23-year Gold Supplier record combined with Trade Assurance and verified supplier status represents a strong platform-backed credibility profile. The only reason it does not receive a perfect score is that the provided data does not include detailed certification documentation, factory audit reports, or industry-specific compliance certificates.

Final Score
19 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis
- Orders in past six months: 10+
- Transaction value in past six months: CN¥2.4M+
- Store rating: 4.9
- Reviews: 6

Elaboration
The supplier shows measurable transaction activity, with CN¥2.4M+ in reported transaction value over the past six months. This indicates that recent business activity is not merely nominal. However, the order count of 10+ is not high, and the review base is limited to 6 reviews. The 4.9 store rating is strong, but the small number of reviews limits the statistical reliability of customer feedback.

Scoring Rationale
The transaction value is a positive signal and supports confidence in recent commercial activity. However, the relatively low order count and limited review quantity reduce the strength of commercial validation. The supplier appears commercially active and credible, but not yet supported by high-volume order evidence or broad customer feedback.

Final Score
15 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis
- Communication response time: ≤7h
- Full Customization: Insufficient Data
- Communication efficiency beyond response time: Insufficient Data

Elaboration
The supplier’s response time of ≤7 hours indicates acceptable communication responsiveness, though it is not within the strongest ≤1 hour service tier. No data is provided regarding full customization, sample development, design support, OEM/ODM capability, language support, or dedicated account management.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier demonstrates basic service capability through a reasonable response time. However, without evidence of full customization capability or stronger communication indicators, the service profile should be scored conservatively. It meets normal sourcing communication expectations but does not demonstrate advanced buyer support capability based on the available data.

Final Score
7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis
- On-time delivery rate: 100.0%

Elaboration
The supplier reports a 100.0% on-time delivery rate, which is the strongest delivery-related metric available in the provided data. No additional data is provided on average lead time, logistics methods, urgent order handling, or historical shipment volume behind this rate.

Scoring Rationale
Based strictly on the provided scoring standard, an on-time delivery rate above 90% qualifies for the 9–10 point range. Since the reported figure is 100.0%, the supplier receives a full score for delivery performance. The score is based only on the stated delivery metric and does not assume broader logistics capability.

Final Score
10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis
- Store rating: 4.9
- Reviews: 6
- Verified supplier: True
- Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
- Factory Verification: True, based on verified supplier status

Elaboration
The supplier has a high store rating of 4.9, which is positive. However, the review count is only 6, making the customer feedback base relatively narrow. Verified supplier status provides some quality-related credibility, but there is no explicit information on finished product inspection, quality control procedures, defect rates, inspection reports, or product-specific certifications.

Scoring Rationale
The high rating and verified supplier status support a generally positive quality impression, but the limited number of reviews prevents strong confidence in customer satisfaction consistency. The absence of Finished Product Inspection data and detailed quality assurance documentation keeps the supplier below the top scoring range.

Final Score
15 / 20

Total Score

82 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Cooperation is recommended with controlled procurement conditions. Hangzhou EDAR International Co., Ltd. is suitable for buyers seeking pest-control and mosquito-repellent products from a long-standing supplier with Trade Assurance, verified status, strong delivery performance, and moderate recent transaction value.

The supplier is especially suitable for small-to-medium importers, online sellers, distributors, and buyers testing low-to-medium MOQ products. Main risks include limited review volume, insufficient data on full customization, lack of disclosed Finished Product Inspection, and limited visibility into production capacity or factory certifications. Growth potential is supported by its long platform history, 100.0% on-time delivery rate, and recent CN¥2.4M+ transaction value, but further supplier qualification should request inspection process details, customization capability, product compliance documents, and recent customer references before larger-volume procurement.

  • Comments

Comments

Leave your comment
Cancel reply

Note: HTML is not translated!

Submit comment

Most popular Blog

Hangzhou Changyu International Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Changyu International Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Yintex Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Yintex Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Hydrotech Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Hydrotech Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Rollmed Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Rollmed Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Jinglian I & E Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Jinglian I & E Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foodchem International Corporation Supplier Evaluation
Foodchem International Corporation Supplier Evaluation
Monsoon International Limited Supplier Evaluation
Monsoon International Limited Supplier Evaluation
Jaya International Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jaya International Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Huanwei Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Huanwei Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Bison Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Bison Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Grin (Hangzhou) Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Grin (Hangzhou) Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Fenloc Bondtek Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Fenloc Bondtek Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Sdm Magnetics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Sdm Magnetics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Jiuzhong Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Jiuzhong Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Benhao Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Benhao Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Langbin Technology (Hangzhou ) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Langbin Technology (Hangzhou ) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Fuhan Packaging Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Fuhan Packaging Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Yuanji Gift Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Yuanji Gift Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Meideng Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Meideng Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Saijun New Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Saijun New Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Blog You May Like

Zhangjiagang Rely Auto Technology Co.,Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Zhangjiagang Rely Auto Technology Co.,Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Sanlida Electrical Technology Co.,Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Sanlida Electrical Technology Co.,Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Yantai Dibo Machinery Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yantai Dibo Machinery Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingdao Mizzen Fashion Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingdao Mizzen Fashion Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Fuyuan Handbag Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Fuyuan Handbag Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Liaoning Expert Partition Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Liaoning Expert Partition Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhengzhou Youmu Machinery Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhengzhou Youmu Machinery Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Krupp Intelligent Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Krupp Intelligent Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Fei Chi Import And Export Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Fei Chi Import And Export Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Tianjin Dongfang Yuhao International Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Tianjin Dongfang Yuhao International Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Yali Jewelry Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Yali Jewelry Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Maiqiyi Aluminum Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Maiqiyi Aluminum Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Junhong Electronic & Technology (Dongguan) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Junhong Electronic & Technology (Dongguan) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Az Winner International Trade Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Az Winner International Trade Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingdao Agrieso Machinery Company Limited Supplier Evaluation
Qingdao Agrieso Machinery Company Limited Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Topfly Headwear&Bag Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Topfly Headwear&Bag Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Jiurui Pneumatic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Jiurui Pneumatic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingdao Hainiu Anti Corrosion Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingdao Hainiu Anti Corrosion Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Oron New Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Oron New Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Wanjia Window And Door Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Wanjia Window And Door Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Information

  • About Us

Store Info

Address:
4578 Marmora Road, Glasgow, D04 89GR
Phones:
800
We are open:

E-mail: kimibetters@gmail.com

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

Get all the latest information on Events, Sales and Offers. Sign up for newsletter today.

Powered By News Top © 2026