Hangzhou Changyu International Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Supplier Evaluation Report: Hangzhou Changyu International Trade Co., Ltd.

Executive Summary

Hangzhou Changyu International Trade Co., Ltd. is a Zhejiang-based Chinese supplier offering ready-to-eat spicy casual food products, mainly hand-peeled bamboo shoot items, with listed MOQs of 200 bags and price ranges of CN¥17.18–21.44. The company reports an 18,000+㎡ factory area, 100+ staff, and verified supplier status, indicating a meaningful physical operating base and basic manufacturing credibility. On -related platform indicators, it is a 1-year Gold Supplier and supports Trade Assurance, but its certification and performance history remain limited. Commercial validation is weak, with 0 recorded orders in the past six months, CN¥4K+ transaction value, no available shop rating, and 0 reviews. Service response is listed as within 14 hours, while customization capability is not provided. Delivery performance is strong based on the reported 100.0% on-time shipment rate. Overall, this supplier may be suitable for cautious trial orders, but larger procurement decisions require further quality, compliance, and transaction verification.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength — 20 Points

Basis

• Factory location: Zhejiang, China
• Factory area: 18,000+㎡
• Employees: 100+ staff
• Verified supplier: True

Elaboration

The supplier reports a factory area exceeding 18,000㎡ and more than 100 employees, which suggests a relatively established operating footprint rather than a micro-scale trading entity. The verified supplier status provides an additional layer of basic credibility regarding the company’s existence and operating profile. However, the provided data does not include detailed production capacity, number of production lines, annual output, equipment details, food safety system information, or third-party factory audit documents beyond the verified supplier indication.

Scoring Rationale

The company size appears stronger than a small workshop and supports the interpretation of a medium-scale supplier with basic production stability. The 18,000+㎡ site is a positive indicator, and 100+ staff suggests the company has some organizational structure. However, the absence of detailed production capacity, factory certification, or audit scope prevents it from being classified as a large-scale, highly transparent supply chain partner.

Final Score

16 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility — 20 Points

Basis

• Gold Supplier: True
• Gold Supplier duration: 1 year
• Trade Assurance: True
• Verified supplier: True
• Certification/industry tags: “Response time ≤14h”
• No additional certification labels provided

Elaboration

The supplier has several core credibility indicators, including Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance support, and verified supplier status. These are positive platform-based trust signals. However, the Gold Supplier history is only 1 year, which limits the strength of long-term platform credibility. The only listed tag is related to response time, not product compliance, factory certification, food safety certification, or quality inspection systems.

Scoring Rationale

The presence of Gold Supplier status and Trade Assurance gives the supplier a reasonable compliance foundation for platform-based purchasing. However, the short Gold Supplier duration and limited certification tag coverage reduce confidence. Since no specific food-related compliance certificates, factory audit reports, or industry certifications are provided, the supplier cannot be rated as having a complete or mature compliance profile.

Final Score

15 / 20

3. Business Performance — 20 Points

Basis

• Orders in the past 6 months: 0
• Transaction value in the past 6 months: CN¥4K+
• Shop rating: Insufficient Data
• Number of reviews: 0

Elaboration

The supplier shows very limited recent commercial activity on the provided platform data. Although a CN¥4K+ transaction value is recorded, the order count is listed as 0, and there are no reviews or shop rating data available. This significantly limits the ability to verify buyer satisfaction, repeat transactions, order consistency, or commercial traction.

Scoring Rationale

Business performance is one of the supplier’s weakest areas. A lack of recorded orders and customer reviews means there is minimal external validation from buyers. The CN¥4K+ transaction value indicates some level of commercial activity, but it is too low to support strong confidence in market acceptance or fulfillment consistency. The missing shop rating further weakens the evaluation.

Final Score

8 / 20

4. Service Capability — 10 Points

Basis

• Communication response time: ≤14h
• Full Customization capability: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier’s response time is listed as within 14 hours, which indicates that communication is available but not especially fast. There is no provided data confirming Full Customization, OEM, ODM, packaging customization, formula customization, private label service, or other value-added service capabilities. Therefore, service capability can only be assessed based on response speed.

Scoring Rationale

A response time of ≤14 hours is acceptable for basic communication but does not meet the high-service benchmark of response within one hour. Because customization capability is not stated, the supplier cannot be credited with advanced service flexibility. The score reflects basic service availability but limited evidence of strong buyer support or customization capability.

Final Score

5 / 10

5. Delivery Performance — 10 Points

Basis

• On-time shipment rate: 100.0%

Elaboration

The reported on-time shipment rate is 100.0%, which is a strong delivery indicator based on the available data. This suggests that, for recorded shipments, the supplier has met shipping timelines. However, the business performance data shows 0 orders in the past six months, so the shipment rate should be interpreted carefully because the underlying shipment volume is not provided.

Scoring Rationale

According to the scoring standard, an on-time shipment rate above 90% qualifies for a high score. The supplier’s reported 100.0% rate supports a full score in this dimension. Nevertheless, procurement teams should verify the shipment sample size before relying on this metric for larger orders.

Final Score

10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback — 20 Points

Basis

• Shop rating: Insufficient Data
• Number of reviews: 0
• Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
• Factory Verification / Verified supplier: True
• Customer feedback evidence: 0 reviews

Elaboration

The supplier has verified supplier status, which provides some basic credibility. However, there is no shop rating, no customer review history, and no provided evidence of Finished Product Inspection. Since the products are ready-to-eat food items, quality assurance information would be especially important, but the supplied dataset does not include food safety certificates, inspection records, quality control procedures, or customer satisfaction indicators.

Scoring Rationale

The lack of customer reviews and missing shop rating substantially weaken quality confidence. Verified supplier status is a positive baseline, but it does not replace product-level quality assurance or buyer feedback. Because Finished Product Inspection is not confirmed and no review-based performance evidence exists, this dimension receives a low score despite the basic verification status.

Final Score

8 / 20

Total Score

Procurement Recommendation

Recommendation: Conditional cooperation with trial-order approach.

Hangzhou Changyu International Trade Co., Ltd. shows reasonable company fundamentals, including an 18,000+㎡ factory area, 100+ staff, verified supplier status, Gold Supplier status, and Trade Assurance support. These factors make the supplier worth considering for initial sourcing discussions or small-scale trial procurement.

However, the supplier is not yet strongly validated from a commercial and customer feedback perspective. The main risks are:
1. Weak transaction record: 0 orders in the past six months and only CN¥4K+ transaction value.
2. No customer review base: 0 reviews and no shop rating available.
3. Insufficient quality data: No Finished Product Inspection data or product-specific quality certification provided.
4. Limited service transparency: Full Customization capability is not provided.
5. Short platform history: Only 1 year as Gold Supplier.

This supplier is more suitable for buyers seeking small trial orders, early-stage supplier screening, or price/product sampling in ready-to-eat bamboo shoot products. It is not yet recommended for large-volume or long-term procurement without additional verification, including product samples, quality inspection reports, food safety documentation, production capacity confirmation, and transaction references. Its growth potential exists due to its physical scale and platform protections, but commercial credibility and quality transparency need further strengthening.