Zaozhuang Puyi International Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Supplier Evaluation Report: Zaozhuang Puyi International Trade Co., Ltd.

Executive Summary

Zaozhuang Puyi International Trade Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Shandong, with a reported factory area of over 23,000㎡ and more than 160 staff. The company appears to operate at a medium-scale production and trading level, supported by factory verification, 5 years as an Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance availability, and a 100.0% on-time delivery rate. Its product listings mainly cover apparel-related categories, including women’s thin suit coats, men’s hoodies, second-hand thick hoodies, children’s summer wear, and mixed used bags bales, with MOQ levels stated in kilograms.

Commercial performance is relatively solid, with over 40 orders and CN¥3.1M+ transaction value in the past six months, alongside a 4.6 store rating and 50+ reviews. However, some quality and service details remain incomplete, especially regarding Finished Product Inspection and full customization capability. Overall, this supplier is suitable for buyers seeking medium-volume apparel or second-hand clothing supply with platform-backed transaction protection and strong delivery reliability.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis

• Factory location: Shandong, China
• Factory area: 23,000+㎡
• Employees: 160+ staff
• Verified supplier / factory verification: True
• Product scope includes apparel and second-hand clothing-related categories

Elaboration

The supplier reports a factory area exceeding 23,000㎡ and a workforce of more than 160 staff, which indicates a meaningful operational base rather than a very small workshop-scale supplier. The combination of physical space and staff count suggests the company has the capacity to support regular production, sorting, packing, or trading operations for kilogram-based apparel orders.

The presence of factory verification adds credibility to the reported company profile. However, the provided data does not include detailed production line count, monthly output, machinery, warehouse capacity, or specific audit reports. Therefore, while the supplier demonstrates a stable medium-scale foundation, the available information is not sufficient to classify it as a large-scale supply chain operator.

Scoring Rationale

A 23,000+㎡ site and 160+ employees are stronger than small factory indicators and support a medium-level production or processing capacity. Factory verification further strengthens the company profile. However, the absence of detailed production capacity, equipment data, or named factory certifications limits the score from reaching the highest range. Based strictly on the available data, the supplier fits the category of a medium-sized stable factory or supplier operation.

Final Score

16 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis

• Gold Supplier: True
• Gold Supplier duration: 5 years
• Trade Assurance: True
• Factory / supplier verification: True
• Certification / platform labels:
• Warranty available
• Response time ≤5h
• On-time delivery 100.0%

Elaboration

The supplier has 5 years of Gold Supplier history, which provides a reasonable level of platform continuity. Trade Assurance is available, giving buyers an additional transaction protection mechanism. The supplier is also identified as verified, which improves credibility compared with unverified platform sellers.

The listed platform labels are relevant to procurement risk control, especially warranty availability and on-time delivery. However, the data does not show additional internationally recognized certifications, product compliance certifications, social compliance audits, or industry-specific certificates. Therefore, platform credibility is strong, but broader compliance documentation remains partially insufficient.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has several important credibility signals: Gold Supplier status, 5-year platform history, Trade Assurance, verification status, and operational performance labels. These are meaningful indicators for platform-based sourcing. However, the lack of detailed third-party compliance certifications or full certification documentation prevents a perfect score. The supplier falls into a strong but not fully comprehensive platform credibility category.

Final Score

18 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis

• Orders in the past 6 months: 40+
• Transaction value in the past 6 months: CN¥3.1M+
• Store rating: 4.6
• Reviews: 50+

Elaboration

The supplier has recorded over 40 orders within the past six months, which indicates active commercial transactions on the platform. The transaction value of CN¥3.1M+ is a positive indicator and suggests that buyers have placed meaningful order volumes rather than only small trial purchases.

The store rating of 4.6 is generally favorable, and 50+ reviews provide some level of market feedback. However, the order count and review base are not high enough to classify the supplier as a top-tier high-volume platform seller. The data supports a conclusion of stable medium-level business performance rather than exceptionally high market validation.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier demonstrates commercial traction through both order count and transaction value. CN¥3.1M+ in six months is relatively solid, and the 4.6 rating supports acceptable buyer satisfaction. However, 40+ orders and 50+ reviews indicate moderate rather than very high transaction frequency. As a result, the supplier is best evaluated as having stable and credible business performance, but not at the highest-performing level.

Final Score

16 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis

• Communication response time: ≤5h
• Full Customization: Insufficient Data
• Other service capability details: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier’s stated response time of ≤5 hours suggests acceptable communication efficiency for standard sourcing inquiries. This is useful for buyers requiring quotations, product clarification, order coordination, or delivery follow-up within a normal business communication window.

However, the provided data does not confirm whether the supplier supports Full Customization, OEM, ODM, private labeling, customized packaging, sample development, or design-based production. Since the scoring dimension specifically requires assessment of full customization capability, this missing information limits the supplier’s score. The available data supports basic service responsiveness, but not advanced customization capability.

Scoring Rationale

A response time of ≤5 hours is reasonable, but it does not meet the highest service standard of ≤1 hour. More importantly, there is no provided evidence of Full Customization or strong customized service capability. Therefore, the supplier should be scored in the normal-response and basic-service range, with deductions for missing customization data.

Final Score

7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis

• On-time delivery rate: 100.0%

Elaboration

The supplier reports a 100.0% on-time delivery rate, which is the strongest quantitative delivery indicator provided. For procurement purposes, this suggests that completed platform orders have been shipped according to agreed timelines.

This is particularly important for apparel and second-hand clothing-related supply, where buyers may depend on container planning, seasonal sales cycles, or warehouse replenishment schedules. However, the data does not provide the total number of shipments behind the delivery rate, average lead time, logistics method, or historical dispute rate. Therefore, the delivery score can be high based on the stated percentage, while still noting that supporting detail is limited.

Scoring Rationale

According to the scoring standard, an on-time delivery rate above 90% qualifies for 9–10 points. Since the provided figure is 100.0%, the supplier meets the highest delivery-performance range. The score is not reduced significantly because the metric directly satisfies the scoring requirement, although additional shipment volume details would further strengthen confidence.

Final Score

10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis

• Store rating: 4.6
• Reviews: 50+
• Factory Verification: True
• Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
• Warranty available: Listed as platform label

Elaboration

The supplier has a 4.6 store rating and more than 50 reviews, which provides a moderate level of customer feedback. This rating is positive and indicates that previous buyers generally had acceptable experiences. Factory verification also contributes to quality confidence by confirming the supplier’s operational presence.

The label “Warranty available” is a positive service-related quality signal, but the exact warranty terms are not provided. More importantly, the data does not confirm Finished Product Inspection, quality control procedures, inspection reports, defect rate, product testing, or third-party quality assurance systems. As a result, the quality assessment is favorable but not comprehensive.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier shows good customer feedback and verified operational status. A 4.6 rating with 50+ reviews is a useful indicator, but the review volume is moderate rather than extensive. The absence of Finished Product Inspection data and detailed QC documentation limits the supplier from entering the highest quality-confidence range. The score reflects good basic quality credibility with incomplete inspection-system visibility.

Final Score

15 / 20

Total Score

Procurement Recommendation

Recommendation: Recommended for conditional cooperation.

Zaozhuang Puyi International Trade Co., Ltd. is suitable for buyers seeking medium-volume apparel or used-clothing-related procurement from a supplier with verified platform presence, Trade Assurance support, stable transaction history, and strong stated delivery performance. The supplier is especially appropriate for buyers who prioritize on-time shipment, platform-backed payment protection, and kilogram-based bulk purchasing.

Suitable customer types include:
- Apparel wholesalers
- Used clothing importers
- Buyers requiring medium-volume bulk orders
- Traders looking for Trade Assurance-supported transactions
- Buyers comfortable with suppliers showing moderate but credible review history

Main risks:
- Finished Product Inspection information is not provided
- Full Customization capability is not confirmed
- Detailed factory audit reports, production capacity data, and quality control procedures are not available
- Review quantity is moderate, not extensive

Growth potential:
The supplier has a solid platform foundation, 5 years of Gold Supplier history, verified status, CN¥3.1M+ recent transaction value, and 100.0% on-time delivery. If the company can provide clearer quality inspection documentation, customization details, and more transparent production capacity data, its procurement reliability and suitability for larger buyers could improve further.