Tianjin Jieya Women'S Hygiene Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Executive Summary
Tianjin Jieya Women's Hygiene Products Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Tianjin, focused on disposable underpads and related non-woven hygiene products. Based on the provided data, the company shows a relatively solid manufacturing base with a reported factory area of 22,000+ ㎡, 80+ staff, and verified supplier status. Its platform profile appears credible, supported by 10 years as a Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance availability, and platform labels including response time within 3 hours and 96.7% on-time delivery. Commercial activity over the past six months is moderate, with 40+ orders and CN¥135.2K+ transaction value. The store rating of 4.8 is positive, but the review count is limited at 6, which restricts confidence in customer feedback depth. This supplier appears suitable for buyers seeking disposable underpad sourcing with verified platform backing and reliable delivery performance, especially small to mid-sized procurement programs. Larger-volume or quality-sensitive buyers should request additional inspection, certification, and customization capability documentation before placing major orders.

Detailed Analysis
1. Company Strength
Basis:
- Factory location: Tianjin, China
- Factory area: 22,000+ ㎡
- Employees: 80+ staff
- Verified supplier: True
Elaboration:
The supplier demonstrates a defined manufacturing presence with a factory area exceeding 22,000 square meters. This indicates a meaningful production footprint for disposable hygiene products. The reported employee base of 80+ staff suggests an operational factory rather than a very small trading operation. Verified supplier status further supports the existence and basic credibility of the production entity.
Scoring Rationale:
The factory size is relatively strong, while the workforce size is moderate rather than large. The verified supplier status adds confidence, but the provided data does not include detailed production lines, monthly capacity, equipment scale, or specific factory audit reports. Therefore, the company fits between a medium stable factory and a stronger manufacturing base, but not enough data supports a top-tier large-scale supply-chain rating.
Final Score: 16 / 20
2. Platform & Compliance Credibility
Basis:
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier tenure: 10 years
- Trade Assurance: True
- Certification / industry labels: Response time ≤3h; On-time delivery 96.7%
- Verified supplier: True
Elaboration:
The supplier has a long-standing presence with 10 years of Gold Supplier status. Trade Assurance availability provides an additional platform-level transaction protection mechanism. Verified supplier status and visible performance labels further strengthen the supplier’s platform credibility.
Scoring Rationale:
A 10-year Gold Supplier record combined with Trade Assurance and verified supplier status represents a strong credibility profile. However, the provided certification labels are mainly platform performance indicators, not formal product or factory compliance certifications. Since no independent product certifications or industry-specific compliance documents are provided, the score is strong but not maximum.
Final Score: 18 / 20
3. Business Performance
Basis:
- Orders in past 6 months: 40+
- Transaction value in past 6 months: CN¥135.2K+
- Store rating: 4.8
- Reviews: 6
Elaboration:
The supplier has generated measurable recent transaction activity, with more than 40 orders and CN¥135.2K+ in transaction value over six months. The store rating of 4.8 is favorable, indicating positive buyer satisfaction among available reviews. However, the number of reviews is low, which limits the statistical reliability of the rating.
Scoring Rationale:
The company shows active business performance, but the transaction value and order count are moderate rather than high. The rating is strong, yet only 6 reviews provide limited commercial validation. This supports a stable mid-level business performance score rather than a high-volume, highly proven supplier score.
Final Score: 15 / 20
4. Service Capability
Basis:
- Communication response time: ≤3h
- Full Customization: Insufficient Data
Elaboration:
The supplier’s response time of within 3 hours indicates acceptable communication efficiency on the platform. Product titles include “OEM” and “Customizable,” but no explicit platform service field confirming Full Customization capability is provided. Therefore, customization strength cannot be fully validated from the supplied data.
Scoring Rationale:
Response speed is reasonable but does not meet the highest benchmark of ≤1 hour. Because Full Customization support is not directly confirmed, service capability should be assessed conservatively. The supplier appears capable of standard communication and possible basic OEM inquiry handling, but the data is insufficient to confirm strong customization service.
Final Score: 7 / 10
5. Delivery Performance
Basis:
- On-time delivery rate: 96.7%
Elaboration:
The supplier’s reported on-time delivery rate of 96.7% is a strong indicator of reliable fulfillment performance. This exceeds the 90% threshold for the highest scoring band under the defined criteria.
Scoring Rationale:
A 96.7% on-time delivery rate supports a high delivery performance score. While no additional data is provided on average lead time, logistics regions, or historical delay cases, the available metric is clearly strong and directly relevant to procurement reliability.
Final Score: 10 / 10
6. Quality & Customer Feedback
Basis:
- Store rating: 4.8
- Reviews: 6
- Verified supplier: True
- Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
- Factory Verification: Verified supplier status provided, but detailed factory verification scope is Insufficient Data
Elaboration:
The supplier has a positive store rating of 4.8, suggesting favorable feedback from buyers who submitted reviews. However, only 6 reviews are available, so customer feedback depth is limited. Verified supplier status provides some baseline credibility, but the data does not confirm Finished Product Inspection or detailed quality control systems.
Scoring Rationale:
The rating is good, but the small review count limits confidence in long-term quality consistency. In addition, there is insufficient data regarding Finished Product Inspection and detailed factory verification scope. As a result, the supplier has a reasonable quality profile but lacks enough documented quality assurance evidence for a high score.
Final Score: 13 / 20
Total Score
79 / 100
Procurement Recommendation
Cooperation is recommended with controlled risk management. Tianjin Jieya Women's Hygiene Products Co., Ltd. is suitable for buyers sourcing disposable underpads and related hygiene products who value verified platform presence, Trade Assurance, moderate recent transaction activity, and strong delivery reliability. It is especially appropriate for small to mid-sized importers, distributors, and trial procurement programs.
Key risks include limited review volume, insufficient data on Finished Product Inspection, unclear formal product certifications, and unconfirmed Full Customization capability. Before large-volume or quality-sensitive orders, buyers should request product specifications, inspection reports, compliance certificates, sample validation, and written confirmation of customization capacity. The supplier shows growth potential due to its 10-year Gold Supplier history, verified status, 22,000+ ㎡ factory area, and strong 96.7% on-time delivery performance.
Leave your comment