Shenzhen Cheng Gao Da Electronic Techology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Executive Summary

Shenzhen Cheng Gao Da Electronic Techology Co., Ltd. is a Guangdong-based electronic cooling fan supplier with a reported factory area of 5,500+㎡ and 130+ staff, indicating a medium-sized production base with basic-to-stable manufacturing capacity. The supplier is factory-verified, has been an Gold Supplier for 7 years, supports Trade Assurance, and displays capability tags including Finished Product Inspection, Full Customization, 3D design capabilities, and Warranty available. Its recent business performance shows 90+ orders and CN¥540.9K+ transaction value over the past six months, supported by a 4.7 store rating and 30+ reviews. These figures suggest moderate commercial validation rather than high-volume marketplace dominance. The main weakness is delivery performance, with an on-time shipment rate of only 69.7%, which represents a notable procurement risk. Overall, this supplier appears suitable for buyers seeking customizable cooling fan products from a verified medium-scale Chinese supplier, especially for sample orders, small-to-medium batch procurement, or projects requiring customization, but delivery control should be closely managed.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength — 20 Points

Basis

• Factory location: Guangdong, China
• Factory area: 5,500+㎡
• Employees: 130+ staff
• Factory-verified supplier: True

Elaboration

The supplier has a reported factory area of more than 5,500㎡ and over 130 employees, which indicates a medium-sized manufacturing operation rather than a very small workshop or purely trading-oriented entity. The presence of factory verification strengthens the credibility of the stated production setup. Based on the provided data, the company appears to have a physical production foundation capable of supporting regular order fulfillment and customized product handling.

However, the available information does not include detailed annual production capacity, production lines, equipment lists, monthly output, R&D staffing, or major customer references. Therefore, while the supplier demonstrates a stable manufacturing base, the data is not sufficient to classify it as a large-scale supply chain player.

Scoring Rationale

Given the 5,500+㎡ factory area, 130+ staff size, and factory verification status, the supplier fits the profile of a medium-sized stable factory. It exceeds the threshold of a small supplier with only basic capability, but the absence of detailed production capacity or advanced factory audit data prevents a higher score in the large-scale category.

Final Score

16 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility — 20 Points

Basis

• Gold Supplier: True
• Gold Supplier duration: 7 years
• Trade Assurance: True
• Factory-verified supplier: True
• Certification / industry tags: Warranty available, 3D design capabilities, Finished product inspection, Full customization

Elaboration

The supplier has maintained Gold Supplier status for 7 years, which provides a meaningful platform credibility record. Trade Assurance support adds transactional protection for buyers, while factory verification provides an additional layer of supplier validation. The listed platform tags are also relatively complete, covering warranty availability, 3D design capability, finished product inspection, and full customization.

The combination of long-term platform presence, transaction protection, and factory verification creates a relatively strong compliance and credibility profile. However, the provided data does not mention internationally recognized product certifications, management system certifications, or third-party audit standards beyond the platform-level verification and tags. Therefore, the assessment should remain within the scope of platform credibility rather than broader regulatory or industry certification compliance.

Scoring Rationale

A 7-year Gold Supplier history, Trade Assurance support, and factory verification indicate strong platform credibility. The certification and capability tags are also reasonably comprehensive. The score is high, but not maximum, because there is insufficient data on external certifications, formal quality management systems, or internationally recognized compliance documentation.

Final Score

18 / 20

3. Business Performance — 20 Points

Basis

• Orders in the past 6 months: 90+
• Transaction value in the past 6 months: CN¥540.9K+
• Store rating: 4.7
• Reviews: 30+

Elaboration

The supplier has recorded more than 90 orders and over CN¥540.9K in transaction value during the past six months. This demonstrates active marketplace performance and confirms that the supplier has recent commercial traction. A store rating of 4.7 is positive and suggests generally satisfactory buyer experience. The review count of 30+ provides some customer feedback base, but it is not large enough to be considered extensive.

The business performance appears stable and commercially validated, especially for a medium-sized supplier. However, the order volume and review count are not high enough to indicate a leading high-volume supplier on the platform. The transaction value is meaningful but should be interpreted as moderate rather than exceptional.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier shows solid recent activity with 90+ orders and CN¥540.9K+ in six-month transaction value. The 4.7 rating supports buyer satisfaction, but the 30+ reviews limit the depth of customer validation. This places the supplier in the stable medium-scale transaction category rather than the high-order, high-review category.

Final Score

15 / 20

4. Service Capability — 10 Points

Basis

• Communication response time: ≤4h
• Full Customization: Listed as supported
• 3D design capabilities: Listed as supported

Elaboration

The supplier’s stated response time of within 4 hours indicates acceptable communication efficiency for international procurement inquiries. While it does not meet the strongest benchmark of response within 1 hour, it remains suitable for normal sourcing communication and project follow-up. The presence of Full Customization and 3D design capability tags suggests the supplier can support buyer-specific requirements, product adjustment, or design-related customization.

This service profile is useful for buyers requiring tailored cooling fan specifications, although the provided data does not include examples of customization projects, engineering team size, sample lead time, or technical support workflow. Therefore, the supplier demonstrates good service potential, but not enough evidence is available to rate it at the highest level.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier supports Full Customization and 3D design capabilities, which strengthens its service capability. The ≤4h response time is reasonable but not top-tier. As a result, the supplier fits the “normal response with customization capability” range rather than the highest service category.

Final Score

8 / 10

5. Delivery Performance — 10 Points

Basis

• On-time shipment rate: 69.7%

Elaboration

The supplier’s on-time shipment rate is 69.7%, which is below the 70% threshold. This is the weakest area in the supplier profile and represents a clear operational risk for procurement planning. For buyers with strict delivery windows, production schedules, or downstream assembly timelines, this performance level may cause delays or require additional buffer time.

Although the supplier has medium-scale capacity and verified platform credibility, the delivery metric indicates that order fulfillment timing is not consistently reliable based on the provided data. Buyers should treat this as a key negotiation and risk-control point before placing significant orders.

Scoring Rationale

According to the required scoring standard, an on-time shipment rate below 70% should receive less than 5 points. Since the rate is 69.7%, it is very close to the threshold but still falls into the below-70% category. Therefore, a low but not minimum score is appropriate.

Final Score

4 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback — 20 Points

Basis

• Store rating: 4.7
• Reviews: 30+
• Finished Product Inspection: Listed
• Factory Verification: True
• Warranty available: Listed

Elaboration

The supplier has a store rating of 4.7, which is a positive indicator of customer satisfaction. The 30+ reviews provide some level of buyer feedback, though the volume is relatively limited compared with suppliers that have extensive review histories. The presence of Finished Product Inspection suggests that the supplier has at least a basic quality-control checkpoint before shipment. Factory verification and warranty availability further support the quality assurance profile.

However, the data does not provide defect rates, inspection reports, product certification details, warranty claim records, or customer complaint analysis. Therefore, while the available indicators are favorable, the quality evaluation cannot be considered fully comprehensive.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has a good rating, factory verification, finished product inspection, and warranty-related support. These are positive quality assurance indicators. However, the review count is only 30+, and there is insufficient data on formal quality certifications, inspection standards, or historical defect performance. This supports a good but not top-tier quality score.

Final Score

16 / 20

Total Score

Procurement Recommendation

Recommendation: Conditional cooperation recommended.

Shenzhen Cheng Gao Da Electronic Techology Co., Ltd. is suitable for buyers seeking cooling fan products from a verified medium-sized Chinese supplier with customization capability, Trade Assurance support, and moderate recent transaction performance. It may be appropriate for sample orders, small-to-medium batch procurement, customized cooling fan projects, and buyers who value platform-backed transaction security.

The main risk is delivery performance. The reported on-time shipment rate of 69.7% is below the acceptable 70% threshold and should be treated as a significant operational concern. Buyers with strict lead-time requirements should confirm production schedules, delivery commitments, and penalty or compensation terms before order placement.

The supplier’s growth potential is supported by its 7-year Gold Supplier status, factory verification, 5,500+㎡ production base, 130+ staff, customization capability, and finished product inspection. If delivery reliability improves, the supplier could become a stronger candidate for repeat procurement and larger-volume cooperation.