zemez1039

Phones: 800
    • Shopping Cart
    • Checkout
News Top
  • Company Center
  • Featured Companies
  • Newest Companies
  • Recommended Companies

Shenzhen Elefine Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

10.07.26 0 Comments Posted by

Executive Summary

Shenzhen Elefine Technology Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Guangdong, with a reported factory area of 3,800+ m² and 50+ staff. The company is listed as a verified supplier and has 5 years of Gold Supplier status, supported by Trade Assurance. Its product listings indicate a focus on security/access-control related products, including wired screen devices, turnstile gates, RFID-related products, face recognition smart devices, and walkthrough metal detector scanners. Business performance appears commercially validated, with 200+ orders and CN¥2.4M+ transaction value over the past six months, alongside a 4.5 store rating and 60+ reviews. Delivery performance is strong, with a 94.4% on-time shipment rate. However, service response time is ≤5h rather than ≤1h, and there is no provided evidence of Full Customization or Finished Product Inspection. Overall, this supplier is suitable for buyers seeking an established medium-scale supplier with platform credibility, stable transaction history, and reliable delivery performance.

Shenzhen Elefine Technology Co., Ltd.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength — 20 Points

Basis

  • Factory location: Guangdong, China
  • Factory area: 3,800+ m²
  • Employees: 50+ staff
  • Verified supplier: True

Elaboration

The supplier demonstrates a defined physical manufacturing or operational base with 3,800+ m² of factory area and more than 50 employees. This suggests the company has more than a very small workshop-level operation and can support regular commercial orders. The verified supplier status also adds credibility to the company’s operational existence and basic supplier profile.

However, the available data does not show a very large production scale, high employee count, multiple production sites, advanced factory audit results, or specific manufacturing certifications. Therefore, while the company appears to have stable basic production capacity, the provided information does not support classifying it as a large-scale supply chain provider.

Scoring Rationale

Given the factory size and staff count, Shenzhen Elefine Technology Co., Ltd. fits best into the medium-to-small but stable supplier category. The verified supplier status strengthens confidence in its operational legitimacy, but the company does not show enough scale indicators to justify a top-tier score of 18–20. Its 3,800+ m² facility and 50+ staff support a moderate production capability assessment.

Final Score

15 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility — 20 Points

Basis

  • Gold Supplier: True
  • Gold Supplier duration: 5 years
  • Trade Assurance: True
  • Certification / platform labels provided:
  • Response time ≤5h
  • On-time delivery 94.4%
  • Verified supplier: True

Elaboration

The supplier has a relatively mature platform presence with 5 years of Gold Supplier status. Trade Assurance availability is an important platform-level protection mechanism for buyers, especially for order payment and transaction security. The verified supplier status further improves credibility, indicating that the supplier has passed at least some form of platform or supplier verification.

The available platform labels are operational rather than certification-heavy, focusing on response time and on-time delivery. There is no provided evidence of additional industry certifications, product compliance certificates, factory audit reports, or internationally recognized quality management certifications.

Scoring Rationale

The combination of 5-year Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance support, and verified supplier status provides a strong platform credibility foundation. The supplier is not new to the platform and has demonstrated continuity. However, the absence of detailed certification records or broader compliance documentation prevents a maximum score. The supplier has solid platform credibility but not a fully comprehensive compliance profile based on the provided data.

Final Score

17 / 20

3. Business Performance — 20 Points

Basis

  • Orders in the past 6 months: 200+
  • Transaction amount in the past 6 months: CN¥2.4M+
  • Store rating: 4.5
  • Number of reviews: 60+

Elaboration

The supplier shows meaningful recent commercial activity. More than 200 orders within six months indicates active buyer demand and recurring transaction flow. A transaction value exceeding CN¥2.4M over the same period also suggests that the supplier is not merely receiving small trial orders, but has achieved measurable sales volume.

The store rating of 4.5 is positive, though not exceptionally high. The review count of 60+ provides some customer feedback base, but it is not large enough to be considered extensive at a high-volume marketplace level.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has a stable and commercially validated transaction record, with both order volume and transaction value supporting confidence in market acceptance. The 4.5 rating is generally favorable, but the review count remains moderate rather than high. Therefore, the supplier fits the “stable medium-scale transaction performance” level rather than the highest performance band.

Final Score

17 / 20

4. Service Capability — 10 Points

Basis

  • Communication response time: ≤5h
  • Full Customization: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

A response time of ≤5 hours indicates acceptable communication efficiency for general procurement interactions. This level of responsiveness can support quotation discussions, product confirmation, and order follow-up, though it is not at the strongest service level defined by ≤1 hour response time.

There is no provided information confirming whether the supplier supports Full Customization. Since customization capability is a key part of this scoring dimension, the absence of this data limits the score. The company may still be able to handle standard orders effectively, but its capacity for customized procurement projects cannot be confirmed from the supplied information.

Scoring Rationale

The response time is reasonable but not exceptional. Because Full Customization capability is not provided, the supplier cannot be rated as having strong service capability. The most appropriate score is in the normal response/basic service range, with a deduction for missing customization evidence.

Final Score

7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance — 10 Points

Basis

  • On-time delivery rate: 94.4%

Elaboration

The supplier’s reported on-time delivery rate of 94.4% is above the 90% benchmark required for the top scoring range. This indicates reliable shipment execution and suggests that the supplier is generally able to meet agreed dispatch timelines.

For procurement buyers, especially those managing project schedules or installation timelines, this is a positive indicator. However, the data only provides the on-time delivery percentage and does not include average lead time, late shipment reasons, logistics mode, or delivery consistency by product category.

Scoring Rationale

According to the scoring rule, an on-time delivery rate above 90% qualifies for 9–10 points. At 94.4%, the supplier demonstrates strong delivery discipline. Because the percentage is solid but not close to perfect, and because no further delivery detail is provided, a score of 9 is appropriate.

Final Score

9 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback — 20 Points

Basis

  • Store rating: 4.5
  • Reviews: 60+
  • Verified supplier: True
  • Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
  • Factory Verification: Supplier is marked as verified supplier

Elaboration

The supplier has a 4.5 store rating and 60+ reviews, which provides a meaningful but moderate customer feedback base. The rating suggests generally positive buyer satisfaction, although it is not at the highest level. The verified supplier status gives additional confidence in the supplier profile, but it does not replace specific quality control evidence.

There is no provided information confirming Finished Product Inspection. There is also no detailed quality management certification, product testing report, defect rate data, return rate data, or inspection procedure information. As a result, the quality assessment must rely mainly on customer rating, review volume, and verified supplier status.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier shows acceptable customer feedback and some platform verification support. However, the lack of Finished Product Inspection data limits the ability to confirm a complete quality assurance system. The review count is useful but not large enough to classify the supplier as having extensive customer validation. Therefore, the supplier fits the “good rating with basic quality assurance evidence” range rather than the top-tier quality category.

Final Score

15 / 20

Total Score

Dimension Score
Company Strength 15 / 20
Platform & Compliance Credibility 17 / 20
Business Performance 17 / 20
Service Capability 7 / 10
Delivery Performance 9 / 10
Quality & Customer Feedback 15 / 20
Total Score 80 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Recommendation: Recommended for conditional cooperation.

Shenzhen Elefine Technology Co., Ltd. is suitable for buyers seeking a medium-scale, platform-verified supplier with stable recent transaction performance and strong delivery reliability. The supplier is especially appropriate for standard procurement orders where Trade Assurance, moderate order history, and on-time delivery performance are important supplier-selection factors.

Suitable customer types:
- Buyers seeking security/access-control related products listed by the supplier
- Small to medium-volume importers requiring low MOQ options
- Buyers who value Trade Assurance and verified supplier status
- Procurement teams prioritizing delivery reliability and recent transaction validation

Main risk points:
- Full Customization capability: Insufficient Data
- Finished Product Inspection system: Insufficient Data
- No provided evidence of detailed product certifications or quality management certifications
- Review base is moderate, not extensive
- Response time is acceptable but not top-tier

Growth potential:
The supplier shows positive growth indicators through 200+ orders and CN¥2.4M+ transaction value in the past six months, supported by a 94.4% on-time delivery rate. If the supplier can provide clearer evidence of inspection procedures, customization capability, and product or factory certifications, its procurement attractiveness would improve further.

  • Comments

Comments

Leave your comment
Cancel reply

Note: HTML is not translated!

Submit comment

Most popular Blog

Shenzhen W&F Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen W&F Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Moko Technology Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Moko Technology Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Topleo Technology Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Topleo Technology Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Higoal Technology Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Higoal Technology Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Cowon Technology Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Cowon Technology Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Ideebo Technology Limted Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Ideebo Technology Limted Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Zhiduojing Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Zhiduojing Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Fuwei Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Fuwei Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Shundarong Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Shundarong Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Peicheng Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Peicheng Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Iwheels Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Iwheels Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Careud Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Careud Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Puxin Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Puxin Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Kace Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Kace Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Chuangxinrui Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Chuangxinrui Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Bozhida Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Bozhida Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Guoyutong Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Guoyutong Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Jaster Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Jaster Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Panmin Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Panmin Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anping Jiahui Wire Mesh Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anping Jiahui Wire Mesh Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Blog You May Like

Shenzhen Poweryear Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Poweryear Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Blue Sea Plastic Product Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Blue Sea Plastic Product Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Taozhou New Materials Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Taozhou New Materials Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Endless Landscape Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Endless Landscape Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Suzhou Keshuosi Robot Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Suzhou Keshuosi Robot Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Yinzhou Yunlong Wanhao Machinery Factory Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Yinzhou Yunlong Wanhao Machinery Factory Supplier Evaluation
Yongkang Yizhe Industry And Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yongkang Yizhe Industry And Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhongshan Jiaye Electric Appliance Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhongshan Jiaye Electric Appliance Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Sanying Fluid Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Sanying Fluid Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Beijing Jingzhilan Environmental Protection Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Beijing Jingzhilan Environmental Protection Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xiamen Timesrui Polymeric Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xiamen Timesrui Polymeric Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wenling Hemu Import & Export Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wenling Hemu Import & Export Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Power Eagle Lubricant Technology Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Power Eagle Lubricant Technology Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Xinnuo Roll Forming Machine Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Xinnuo Roll Forming Machine Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anhui Lezet Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anhui Lezet Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Three Iron-Printing & Tin-Making Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Three Iron-Printing & Tin-Making Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shaoxing Yunjia Textile Product Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shaoxing Yunjia Textile Product Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangmen Hagood Lighting Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangmen Hagood Lighting Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jinhua Hongsheng Cultural And Creative Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jinhua Hongsheng Cultural And Creative Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhongshan Shinyland Lighting Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhongshan Shinyland Lighting Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Information

  • About Us

Store Info

Address:
4578 Marmora Road, Glasgow, D04 89GR
Phones:
800
We are open:

E-mail: kimibetters@gmail.com

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

Get all the latest information on Events, Sales and Offers. Sign up for newsletter today.

Powered By News Top © 2026