zemez1039

Phones: 800
    • Shopping Cart
    • Checkout
News Top
  • Company Center
  • Featured Companies
  • Newest Companies
  • Recommended Companies

Shenzhen Hongkai Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

10.07.26 0 Comments Posted by

Executive Summary

Shenzhen Hongkai Technology Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Guangdong, offering electric kettle and water boiler products with relatively low MOQs ranging from 1 to 10 sets/pieces. Based on the provided data, the company operates a 3,600+㎡ facility with 50+ staff and is marked as a verified supplier, indicating basic factory presence and some degree of supply-chain credibility. Its profile shows 3 years as a Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance support, Finished Product Inspection, Full Customization, and ODM service availability. However, business performance remains modest, with 20+ orders and CN¥13.5K+ transaction value over the past six months. The store rating of 4.7 with 20+ reviews is positive but supported by a limited review base. The main concern is delivery reliability, as the on-time dispatch rate is only 62.5%. This supplier may be suitable for small-batch buyers, product testing, or customized low-volume sourcing, but larger or time-sensitive procurement should proceed cautiously.

Shenzhen Hongkai Technology Co., Ltd.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis
- Factory location: Guangdong, China
- Factory area: 3,600+㎡
- Employees: 50+ staff
- Verified supplier: True

Elaboration
The supplier has a physical factory scale of 3,600+㎡ and a workforce of more than 50 employees. This indicates an established operating base rather than a purely trading-oriented profile. However, the provided data does not include annual production capacity, number of production lines, machinery details, factory audit reports, export volume, or major customer references. These missing elements limit the ability to confirm large-scale manufacturing strength.

Scoring Rationale
The factory area and employee count suggest a small-to-medium production setup with basic manufacturing capability. The verified supplier status adds credibility, but the scale does not support classification as a large, highly stable supply-chain operator. Due to insufficient data on production output and audit depth, the score should remain in the small-to-mid factory range.

Final Score
13 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier duration: 3 years
- Trade Assurance: True
- Verification status: Verified supplier
- Tags: Warranty available, Finished Product Inspection, Full Customization, ODM service available

Elaboration
The supplier has several important platform credibility indicators, including Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance support, and verified supplier status. The listed service and compliance-related tags also strengthen its profile, especially Finished Product Inspection and Warranty available. However, the Gold Supplier history is 3 years, which is credible but not long-term compared with suppliers with more extended platform histories. No independent third-party certifications, factory audit documents, product safety certifications, or compliance certificates are provided.

Scoring Rationale
The platform credibility is relatively solid because the core trust mechanisms are present. However, the limited Gold Supplier duration and lack of detailed certification evidence prevent a higher score. The supplier fits the category of having core platform certifications but not a fully mature long-term compliance profile.

Final Score
16 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis
- Orders in past 6 months: 20+
- Transaction value in past 6 months: CN¥13.5K+
- Store rating: 4.7
- Reviews: 20+

Elaboration
The supplier has recorded some recent transaction activity, but the order count and transaction value are relatively low. A 4.7 store rating is positive, yet the review base of 20+ is limited, meaning customer feedback is not large enough to strongly validate consistent market performance. The provided data does not include repeat buyer rate, export countries, key customers, category ranking, or long-term sales history.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier demonstrates basic commercial activity but not strong transaction depth. The rating is favorable, but the low six-month transaction amount and limited order volume suggest the business is still relatively small on the platform. This supports a lower-to-middle score rather than a high business-performance rating.

Final Score
12 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis
- Response time: ≤8h
- Full Customization: Listed
- ODM service available: Listed

Elaboration
The supplier supports Full Customization and ODM service, which indicates some capability to handle customized requirements. The response time of ≤8 hours is acceptable for standard sourcing communication, but it does not meet the strongest service benchmark of response within one hour. No data is provided on quotation speed, engineering support, sample lead time, multilingual service, or dedicated account management.

Scoring Rationale
The customization indicators are positive, but the response speed is moderate rather than highly responsive. Since communication is not within the top-tier response range and deeper service capabilities are not documented, the supplier fits the normal-response and basic-to-moderate customization category.

Final Score
7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis
- On-time dispatch rate: 62.5%

Elaboration
The on-time dispatch rate is the clearest weakness in the supplier profile. At 62.5%, delivery reliability is below the 70% threshold. For buyers with strict launch schedules, seasonal sales windows, or fixed delivery commitments, this performance may create operational risk. No supporting data is provided regarding average lead time, logistics partners, late-shipment causes, or corrective actions.

Scoring Rationale
According to the scoring standard, an on-time dispatch rate below 70% should receive below 5 points. Since the provided rate is significantly below the acceptable threshold, delivery performance must be scored conservatively.

Final Score
4 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis
- Store rating: 4.7
- Reviews: 20+
- Finished Product Inspection: Listed
- Verified supplier: True
- Warranty available: Listed

Elaboration
The supplier has a positive rating of 4.7 and lists Finished Product Inspection and Warranty available, which are useful quality assurance indicators. Verified supplier status also supports basic credibility. However, the number of reviews is still limited, and there is no provided evidence of product certifications, defect rates, inspection reports, return rates, or third-party quality audit results.

Scoring Rationale
The quality profile is reasonably positive because the rating is good and the supplier lists finished product inspection. However, the limited review volume and absence of detailed quality documentation prevent a top-tier score. The supplier appears to have basic quality controls, but the customer feedback base is not yet large enough to confirm consistently strong quality performance.

Final Score
15 / 20

Total Score

67 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Cooperation is conditionally recommended for small-batch procurement, sample testing, low-MOQ orders, and buyers seeking electric kettle products with customization or ODM options. The supplier is not yet ideal for large-volume or time-sensitive procurement due to its low on-time dispatch rate of 62.5% and modest recent transaction performance.

Main risks include weak delivery reliability, limited transaction scale, and insufficient public data on production capacity, certifications, audit depth, and long-term customer validation. Growth potential exists because the supplier has Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance, verified supplier status, Finished Product Inspection, Full Customization, and ODM service tags. Buyers should start with small trial orders, confirm lead times in writing, request inspection evidence, and use Trade Assurance before scaling order volume.

  • Comments

Comments

Leave your comment
Cancel reply

Note: HTML is not translated!

Submit comment

Most popular Blog

Shenzhen W&F Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen W&F Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Moko Technology Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Moko Technology Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Topleo Technology Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Topleo Technology Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Higoal Technology Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Higoal Technology Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Cowon Technology Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Cowon Technology Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Ideebo Technology Limted Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Ideebo Technology Limted Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Zhiduojing Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Zhiduojing Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Fuwei Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Fuwei Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Shundarong Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Shundarong Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Peicheng Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Peicheng Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Iwheels Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Iwheels Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Careud Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Careud Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Puxin Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Puxin Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Kace Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Kace Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Chuangxinrui Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Chuangxinrui Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Bozhida Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Bozhida Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Guoyutong Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Guoyutong Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Jaster Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Jaster Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Panmin Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Panmin Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Tianjin Xiangliyuan Steel Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Tianjin Xiangliyuan Steel Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Blog You May Like

Hangzhou Danno Machinery Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Danno Machinery Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Cangzhou Huicong Hardware Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Cangzhou Huicong Hardware Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Acetech Intelligent Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Acetech Intelligent Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Getter Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Getter Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen First Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen First Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenyang Zhilan Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenyang Zhilan Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shangrao Fengshang Ruicai Industry And Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shangrao Fengshang Ruicai Industry And Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Haining Yongxia Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Haining Yongxia Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhongshan Hgm Electric Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhongshan Hgm Electric Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Jingfei Instrument Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Jingfei Instrument Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Litone Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Litone Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Twins Metal& Plastic Product Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Twins Metal& Plastic Product Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Torch Electronic Company Limited Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Torch Electronic Company Limited Supplier Evaluation
Zhongshan Topson Electrical Appliances Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhongshan Topson Electrical Appliances Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Tianjin Zhanzhi Steel Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Tianjin Zhanzhi Steel Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Shangqiu Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Shangqiu Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Hengfeng Home Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Hengfeng Home Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Panmin Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Panmin Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Taizhou Retop Mechanical & Electrical Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Taizhou Retop Mechanical & Electrical Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Chongqing Senci Import & Export Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Chongqing Senci Import & Export Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Information

  • About Us

Store Info

Address:
4578 Marmora Road, Glasgow, D04 89GR
Phones:
800
We are open:

E-mail: kimibetters@gmail.com

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

Get all the latest information on Events, Sales and Offers. Sign up for newsletter today.

Powered By News Top © 2026