zemez1039

Phones: 800
    • Shopping Cart
    • Checkout
News Top
  • Company Center
  • Featured Companies
  • Newest Companies
  • Recommended Companies

Haining Yongxia Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

10.07.26 0 Comments Posted by

Executive Summary

Haining Yongxia Clothing Co., Ltd. is a China-based apparel supplier located in Zhejiang, with a reported factory area of 1,000+㎡ and 20+ staff. Based on the available data, the company appears to be a small-scale but operationally active manufacturer/supplier focused on women’s suede and genuine leather skirt products, with low MOQ offerings of 2 pieces across listed products. Its strongest advantages are platform credibility and commercial validation: it has been an Gold Supplier for 7 years, supports Trade Assurance, is marked as a verified supplier, and has achieved 500+ orders and CN¥2M+ transaction value over the past six months. Customer-facing indicators are also strong, with a 4.9 store rating and 100+ reviews. Delivery performance is solid, with a 93.9% on-time dispatch rate. However, its limited staff size and modest factory area suggest limited large-scale production capacity. This supplier is most suitable for small to medium buyers, boutique brands, leather apparel retailers, and buyers requiring low MOQ sourcing rather than high-volume mass production.

Haining Yongxia Clothing Co., Ltd.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength — 20 Points

Basis

  • Company: Haining Yongxia Clothing Co., Ltd.
  • Country/Region: China, Zhejiang
  • Factory area: 1,000+㎡
  • Employees: 20+ staff
  • Verified supplier/factory audit status: True

Elaboration

The supplier has a physical production base with a reported area of over 1,000㎡ and more than 20 employees. This indicates that the company has basic manufacturing or operational capacity rather than being only a trading entity. The verified supplier status adds credibility to the existence and legitimacy of the business operation.

However, compared with larger-scale apparel manufacturers, the factory size and staff count remain relatively modest. A 1,000+㎡ facility and 20+ employees suggest a small to lower-mid-sized operation, more suitable for flexible production, small-batch orders, and niche apparel categories rather than very large-volume programs. The product listings also show low MOQs of 2 pieces, which aligns more with small-batch, sample, boutique, or customized purchasing models.

Scoring Rationale

The company demonstrates basic factory capacity, a verified supplier status, and a defined operating location. These are positive indicators of operational substance. However, the limited staff size and factory area prevent it from being classified as a large-scale stable supply chain. The available data supports a conclusion that the supplier has foundational production capability but may face capacity constraints for large-volume or highly time-sensitive bulk orders.

Final Score

13 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility — 20 Points

Basis

  • Gold Supplier: True
  • Gold Supplier duration: 7 years
  • Trade Assurance: True
  • Verified supplier: True
  • Certification/industry labels:
  • Low MOQ for customization
  • Warranty available
  • Finished product inspection

Elaboration

The supplier has a relatively strong platform credibility profile. A 7-year Gold Supplier record indicates a stable presence on the platform over multiple years. Trade Assurance support is also an important purchasing protection mechanism, especially for international buyers concerned with payment security, shipment execution, and order compliance.

The supplier is additionally marked as verified, and its profile includes platform labels such as “Finished product inspection,” “Warranty available,” and “Low MOQ for customization.” These labels improve the supplier’s compliance and buyer-protection profile, although the data does not provide details on external certifications, international quality standards, or specific factory audit reports beyond the verified status.

Scoring Rationale

The combination of 7 years as a Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance availability, verified supplier status, and multiple relevant platform labels creates a strong credibility foundation. The supplier does not receive a perfect score because the provided data does not include detailed third-party audit certificates, international compliance certifications, or named quality management system certifications. Still, within the scope of platform-based sourcing, its credibility indicators are strong.

Final Score

19 / 20

3. Business Performance — 20 Points

Basis

  • Orders in the past 6 months: 500+
  • Transaction value in the past 6 months: CN¥2M+
  • Store rating: 4.9
  • Number of reviews: 100+

Elaboration

The supplier shows strong recent commercial activity. More than 500 orders in the past six months indicates consistent buyer demand and active transaction flow. A transaction value exceeding CN¥2M over the same period further confirms that the supplier is not only receiving small trial inquiries but is converting orders into meaningful sales volume.

The store rating of 4.9 is also a strong performance signal, especially when supported by 100+ reviews. This combination suggests that the supplier has achieved both transaction activity and positive customer feedback. The available data does not show repeat purchase rate, buyer geography, or customer type, so the analysis cannot determine whether the business is concentrated in a specific market or diversified across multiple buyer segments.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier’s recent order volume, transaction value, high store rating, and review base all point to a commercially validated supplier with stable platform activity. The score is high because the business performance indicators are clearly above basic validation level. A slight deduction is applied because the data does not include deeper commercial metrics such as repeat buyer ratio, cancellation rate, dispute rate, or long-term customer retention.

Final Score

19 / 20

4. Service Capability — 10 Points

Basis

  • Communication response time: ≤9h
  • Customization-related label: Low MOQ for customization
  • Full Customization: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier’s reported response time of within 9 hours indicates acceptable communication efficiency for cross-border procurement. It is not an ultra-fast response level, but it is within a reasonable range for standard sourcing communication. This suggests that buyers can expect relatively timely replies, though not necessarily real-time or same-hour service.

The supplier has a platform label indicating “Low MOQ for customization,” which is a positive sign for buyers seeking flexible small-batch or customized orders. However, the data does not confirm whether the supplier supports full customization, such as full design development, private label packaging, material substitution, pattern making, or OEM/ODM development. Therefore, the customization capability should be viewed as basic to moderate based only on the available information.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier demonstrates acceptable response speed and some customization flexibility through the “Low MOQ for customization” label. However, because response time is not within one hour and Full Customization is not confirmed, the service capability cannot be scored at the highest level. The available data supports a moderate service capability rating suitable for standard inquiries and low-MOQ customization discussions.

Final Score

7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance — 10 Points

Basis

  • On-time dispatch rate: 93.9%

Elaboration

The supplier’s on-time dispatch rate of 93.9% is a strong delivery indicator. According to the scoring framework, an on-time shipment rate above 90% falls into the 9–10 point range. This suggests that the supplier generally manages order processing and dispatch schedules effectively.

For apparel and leather-related products, delivery reliability is important because delays can affect seasonal selling windows, inventory planning, and retail launch schedules. A 93.9% rate provides buyers with a relatively dependable baseline for fulfillment planning. However, the data does not include average lead time, peak-season delivery performance, or delay reasons, so delivery capability should still be monitored during initial cooperation.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier meets the highest delivery-performance bracket based on its 93.9% on-time dispatch rate. A small deduction is applied because the data does not provide additional operational delivery details such as production lead time, logistics mode, delay history, or performance by order size.

Final Score

9 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback — 20 Points

Basis

  • Store rating: 4.9
  • Reviews: 100+
  • Finished product inspection: Present as platform label
  • Verified supplier/factory verification: True

Elaboration

The supplier has strong customer-facing quality indicators. A 4.9 store rating is high, and the presence of 100+ reviews gives the rating a reasonable level of credibility. The “Finished product inspection” label is also a positive quality-control signal, indicating that inspection is part of the supplier’s stated process or platform-recognized profile.

The verified supplier status further supports the supplier’s credibility from a quality assurance perspective. However, the data does not include detailed defect rates, inspection standards, AQL levels, material testing reports, leather authenticity testing, or third-party quality certificates. Therefore, while the quality profile is strong at the platform level, deeper product-quality validation would still be needed before placing large or premium-positioned orders.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier earns a high score because it combines a strong rating, a meaningful number of reviews, finished product inspection, and verified supplier status. These indicators support confidence in basic quality consistency and customer satisfaction. The score is not perfect because detailed quality-control documentation, testing reports, and product-specific inspection data are not provided.

Final Score

18 / 20

Total Score

Dimension Score
Company Strength 13 / 20
Platform & Compliance Credibility 19 / 20
Business Performance 19 / 20
Service Capability 7 / 10
Delivery Performance 9 / 10
Quality & Customer Feedback 18 / 20
Total Score 85 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Recommendation: Recommended for cooperation, especially for small to medium-volume sourcing and low-MOQ apparel purchasing.

Haining Yongxia Clothing Co., Ltd. shows strong platform credibility, active recent transaction performance, high customer rating, and reliable delivery performance. Its 7-year Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance support, verified supplier status, 500+ recent orders, CN¥2M+ recent transaction value, and 4.9 rating provide a solid basis for procurement confidence.

Most suitable customer types:
- Boutique fashion retailers
- Small and medium apparel brands
- Buyers seeking low MOQ leather or suede skirt products
- Trial-order buyers evaluating women’s leather apparel suppliers
- E-commerce sellers needing flexible order quantities

Main risk points:
- Factory scale is relatively small, with 1,000+㎡ and 20+ staff.
- Full Customization capability is Insufficient Data.
- No detailed third-party quality certificates, AQL standards, or material testing reports are provided.
- Large-volume production capacity is not fully evidenced by the available data.

Growth potential:
The supplier has strong commercial momentum and platform credibility. If it can provide more detailed quality documentation, clarify customization capabilities, and demonstrate scalable production capacity, it could become a stronger sourcing partner for larger or more structured apparel procurement programs.

  • Comments

Comments

Leave your comment
Cancel reply

Note: HTML is not translated!

Submit comment

Most popular Blog

Haining Mingtra Textile Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Haining Mingtra Textile Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Haining Longtime Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Haining Longtime Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Haining Zhongfa Magnetics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Haining Zhongfa Magnetics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Haining Halong Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Haining Halong Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Haining Bright New Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Haining Bright New Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Haining Jiangsen Artificial Grass Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Haining Jiangsen Artificial Grass Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Haining Yitex Technical Fabrics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Haining Yitex Technical Fabrics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Haining Ouneng Arts And Crafts Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Haining Ouneng Arts And Crafts Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shantou Fenteng Clothing Factory Supplier Evaluation
Shantou Fenteng Clothing Factory Supplier Evaluation
Hk Flowers Clothing Limited Supplier Evaluation
Hk Flowers Clothing Limited Supplier Evaluation
Quanzhou Minzhen Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Quanzhou Minzhen Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenqiguodu (Shangqiu) Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenqiguodu (Shangqiu) Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Naisen Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Naisen Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongyang Yihe Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongyang Yihe Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shangrao Menglu Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shangrao Menglu Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Woao Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Woao Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Xixi Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Xixi Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Haiyun Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Haiyun Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Mofei Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Mofei Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Fourfocus Corp., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Fourfocus Corp., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Blog You May Like

Guangzhou Lidi Automobile Supplies Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Lidi Automobile Supplies Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Baoding Win Metal Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Baoding Win Metal Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongyang Huayi Wood Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongyang Huayi Wood Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Luoyang Smartstone Technology Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Luoyang Smartstone Technology Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Zhuhai Tianhui Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhuhai Tianhui Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Shundarong Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Shundarong Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Lancai Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Lancai Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingdao Borton Steel Structure Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingdao Borton Steel Structure Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Yuehui Lighting Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Yuehui Lighting Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Henan Moon Hair Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Henan Moon Hair Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Moran Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Moran Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangsu Shangying Photoelectric Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangsu Shangying Photoelectric Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Changge City Lingxing Power Machinery Factory Supplier Evaluation
Changge City Lingxing Power Machinery Factory Supplier Evaluation
Suzhou Colorful Fish Textile Co.,Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Suzhou Colorful Fish Textile Co.,Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Jintong Flnorescent Magnetized Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jintong Flnorescent Magnetized Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Laoting Zhuozhan International Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Laoting Zhuozhan International Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Sibuen Toys Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Sibuen Toys Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Nanhai Niu Yuan Hardware Product Co,Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Nanhai Niu Yuan Hardware Product Co,Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Sac Tech. Dev. (Chongqing) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Sac Tech. Dev. (Chongqing) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangxi Xinde Electromechanical Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangxi Xinde Electromechanical Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Information

  • About Us

Store Info

Address:
4578 Marmora Road, Glasgow, D04 89GR
Phones:
800
We are open:

E-mail: kimibetters@gmail.com

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

Get all the latest information on Events, Sales and Offers. Sign up for newsletter today.

Powered By News Top © 2026