zemez1039

Phones: 800
    • Shopping Cart
    • Checkout
News Top
  • Company Center
  • Featured Companies
  • Newest Companies
  • Recommended Companies

Shenzhen New Display Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

10.07.26 0 Comments Posted by

Supplier Evaluation Report: Shenzhen New Display Co., Ltd.

Shenzhen New Display Co., Ltd.

Executive Summary

Shenzhen New Display Co., Ltd. is a Guangdong, China-based display supplier with a reported factory area of over 2,000 m² and more than 60 staff. The company offers LCD and AMOLED display products with low minimum order quantities of 5 pieces, indicating suitability for sample purchasing, small-batch procurement, and customized display sourcing. Its profile shows strong platform credibility, including 12 years as a Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance support, supplier verification, and listed service/quality tags such as Finished Product Inspection, ODM service, Full Customization, and Warranty available. Business performance appears stable, with 30+ orders and CN¥1M+ transaction value over the past six months, though the review count is relatively limited at 8 reviews despite a 5.0 store rating. The supplier shows strong service and delivery performance, with response time within one hour and 100% on-time dispatch rate. Overall, it is suitable for buyers seeking verified display suppliers with customization capability and moderate transaction validation.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis

  • Company name: Shenzhen New Display Co., Ltd.
  • Location: Guangdong, China
  • Factory area: 2,000+ m²
  • Employees: 60+ staff
  • Verified supplier / factory-audited supplier: True

Elaboration

The supplier has a documented physical production base with over 2,000 m² of factory space and more than 60 employees. This indicates that the company has an established operating structure rather than being a purely trading-oriented storefront. The employee size and factory area suggest small-to-medium scale production capacity, which may be suitable for customized display orders, sample development, and moderate-volume procurement.

The presence of a verified supplier status strengthens confidence in the company’s operational legitimacy. However, the provided data does not include detailed production line numbers, monthly output capacity, equipment list, ISO certification, or specific factory audit report details. Therefore, while the company demonstrates a stable basic manufacturing foundation, the available information is not sufficient to classify it as a large-scale supply chain manufacturer.

Scoring Rationale

A factory area of 2,000+ m² and 60+ employees indicates more than basic workshop capacity but does not reach the level of a large-scale, high-capacity manufacturer based on the provided data. The verified supplier status improves the score because it provides some external validation of the company’s existence and operational base. However, the lack of detailed production capacity, production equipment, and formal factory certification information limits the ability to assign a top-tier score.

Final Score

15 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis

  • Gold Supplier: True
  • Gold Supplier duration: 12 years
  • Trade Assurance: True
  • Verified supplier: True
  • Certification / industry tags:
  • Warranty available
  • Finished product inspection
  • ODM service available
  • Full customization

Elaboration

The supplier demonstrates strong platform credibility through a long-standing Gold Supplier membership of 12 years. This is a meaningful indicator of platform continuity and commercial presence. Trade Assurance support also provides buyers with transaction protection mechanisms, which is important for cross-border procurement.

The supplier is marked as verified, and its profile includes several relevant compliance and service-related tags, including warranty availability, finished product inspection, ODM service, and full customization. These tags suggest that the supplier’s platform profile is relatively complete and commercially mature. However, the provided data does not list internationally recognized management system certifications such as ISO, nor does it provide detailed third-party audit documentation. Therefore, the evaluation is limited to the platform-level compliance information available.

Scoring Rationale

The combination of 12 years as a Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance support, supplier verification, and multiple relevant quality/service tags represents a strong platform credibility profile. The long Gold Supplier history is especially positive. The score is not a full 20 because no additional formal factory certification or globally recognized compliance certification is provided in the dataset.

Final Score

19 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis

  • Orders in the past 6 months: 30+
  • Transaction value in the past 6 months: CN¥1M+
  • Store rating: 5.0
  • Number of reviews: 8

Elaboration

The supplier has recorded more than 30 orders and over CN¥1M in transaction value during the past six months. This indicates that the supplier has active commercial transactions and is not an inactive or unproven storefront. The transaction value is relatively meaningful, especially considering the listed products include display modules with varying price ranges.

The store rating is 5.0, which is positive. However, the number of reviews is only 8, which means the rating base is still limited. A high rating with a small review count should be interpreted cautiously because it does not yet represent a broad customer feedback sample. The order volume and transaction value support a stable medium-level business performance, but the limited review count prevents the supplier from being classified as highly validated by customer feedback.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier shows healthy recent business activity with 30+ orders and CN¥1M+ in transactions, which supports a mid-to-strong business performance score. The 5.0 store rating is favorable, but the review count of 8 is relatively low and limits confidence in broad customer acceptance. Based on the available data, the supplier fits the “stable medium-scale transaction” category rather than the highest-performance category.

Final Score

16 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis

  • Response time: ≤1 hour
  • Full customization: Available
  • ODM service: Available

Elaboration

The supplier demonstrates strong service capability based on the provided response time of less than or equal to one hour. Fast response is important in display procurement, particularly when buyers need to confirm specifications such as size, resolution, interface type, MOQ, customization options, and pricing.

The supplier also lists Full Customization and ODM service availability, indicating it can potentially support customized display requirements rather than only standard product sales. This is especially relevant for buyers sourcing LCD, IPS, TFT, or AMOLED modules for integration into specific devices or industrial applications. However, the data does not provide detailed examples of customization cases, engineering team size, development lead times, or communication performance metrics beyond response time.

Scoring Rationale

A response time of ≤1 hour meets the highest service-performance benchmark. The availability of Full Customization and ODM service further supports a strong service capability score. While more detailed customization evidence is not provided, the available platform data is sufficient to assign a top-level score in this dimension.

Final Score

10 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis

  • On-time dispatch rate: 100.0%

Elaboration

The supplier reports a 100.0% on-time dispatch rate. This is a strong indicator of delivery reliability within the available platform data. For display procurement, on-time dispatch is important because delays in electronic components can directly affect production schedules, prototyping timelines, and downstream assembly operations.

However, the dataset does not include average lead time, logistics method, international delivery performance, or historical delay cases. Therefore, the evaluation is based strictly on the reported on-time dispatch rate.

Scoring Rationale

According to the scoring criteria, an on-time dispatch rate above 90% qualifies for 9–10 points. Since the supplier’s reported rate is 100.0%, it reaches the top range for this dimension. No negative delivery data is provided.

Final Score

10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis

  • Store rating: 5.0
  • Number of reviews: 8
  • Finished Product Inspection: Available
  • Verified supplier / factory-audited supplier: True
  • Warranty available: Listed

Elaboration

The supplier has a 5.0 store rating, which is positive from a customer satisfaction perspective. It also lists Finished Product Inspection and Warranty available, both of which are relevant quality assurance indicators. The verified supplier status provides additional credibility that the company has undergone some level of platform verification.

However, the number of customer reviews is only 8. This creates a limitation in assessing quality consistency across a large buyer base. A perfect rating is valuable, but with a small review sample, it should not be interpreted as conclusive evidence of consistently high quality across many orders or long-term supply cycles. The provided data also does not include defect rates, inspection standards, sample approval process, quality certifications, or return/claim statistics.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier deserves a strong score due to its 5.0 rating, Finished Product Inspection tag, warranty availability, and verified supplier status. Nevertheless, the low review count and absence of detailed quality system certifications or defect data prevent it from reaching the highest score band. The quality profile appears good but not fully validated at scale.

Final Score

17 / 20

Total Score

Dimension Score
Company Strength 15 / 20
Platform & Compliance Credibility 19 / 20
Business Performance 16 / 20
Service Capability 10 / 10
Delivery Performance 10 / 10
Quality & Customer Feedback 17 / 20
Total Score 87 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Recommendation: Recommended for cooperation, especially for sample orders, small-to-medium batch procurement, and customized display sourcing.

Shenzhen New Display Co., Ltd. shows strong platform credibility, fast response capability, full customization support, and excellent reported delivery performance. Its 12-year Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance support, verified supplier status, and Finished Product Inspection tag make it a relatively credible sourcing option within the provided data.

Suitable customer types include:
- Buyers seeking LCD, TFT, IPS, or AMOLED display modules
- Engineering teams requiring low-MOQ samples
- Small-to-medium manufacturers needing customized display solutions
- Buyers who value fast supplier communication and Trade Assurance protection

Main risks:
- Review count is limited at only 8, so customer feedback depth is not extensive.
- Factory scale is moderate, with 2,000+ m² and 60+ staff, but no detailed monthly capacity data is provided.
- No specific ISO certification, production equipment list, defect rate, or detailed audit report is included in the provided data. These areas should be verified before large-volume or long-term procurement.

Growth potential:
The supplier has solid platform maturity, stable recent transaction activity, customization capability, and strong delivery metrics. If it can provide more detailed production capacity data, quality certifications, and expanded customer feedback, it could become a stronger candidate for larger-scale procurement programs.

  • Comments

Comments

Leave your comment
Cancel reply

Note: HTML is not translated!

Submit comment

Most popular Blog

Xiamen Maxcanopy Display Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xiamen Maxcanopy Display Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen New Brightyoung Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen New Brightyoung Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Huiming New Energy Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Huiming New Energy Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Topway New Energy Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Topway New Energy Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Pufa New Energy Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Pufa New Energy Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen New Image Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen New Image Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Jianghe New Materials Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Jianghe New Materials Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Flyfish New Materials Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Flyfish New Materials Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Misource New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Misource New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Keheng New Energy Technology (Shenzhen)  Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Keheng New Energy Technology (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Huayite New Energy Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Huayite New Energy Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen New Star Glass & Packing Manufacture Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen New Star Glass & Packing Manufacture Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
New Powerful Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
New Powerful Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhongshan New Lighting Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhongshan New Lighting Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Eplastmer New Material Co.,Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Eplastmer New Material Co.,Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Eason New Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Eason New Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anhui Linyuanwai New Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anhui Linyuanwai New Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Kayrun New Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Kayrun New Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Haoheng New Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Haoheng New Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Asia Fuji Changlin Elevator (Xinyu) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Asia Fuji Changlin Elevator (Xinyu) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Blog You May Like

Foshan Keenhai Metal Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Keenhai Metal Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anping Zhonghao Traffic Safety Facilities Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anping Zhonghao Traffic Safety Facilities Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Chengdu Mind Golden Card System Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Chengdu Mind Golden Card System Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Jingmi Scarf Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Jingmi Scarf Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Nanjing Giant Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Nanjing Giant Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhongshan Huishine Pcba Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhongshan Huishine Pcba Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangsu Zhongmei Aluminum Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangsu Zhongmei Aluminum Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yueqing Yomin Electric Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yueqing Yomin Electric Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Tiandelvbai Building Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Tiandelvbai Building Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhuji Fengfan Piping Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhuji Fengfan Piping Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Sichuan Leton Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Sichuan Leton Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Yili Jewelry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Yili Jewelry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Meidong Acoustics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Meidong Acoustics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Sichuan Botong Plastic Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Sichuan Botong Plastic Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Huizhou Chuangjing Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Huizhou Chuangjing Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Shengfa Weiye Plastic Mould Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Shengfa Weiye Plastic Mould Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jet Scaffold Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jet Scaffold Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Langqing Electric Car Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Langqing Electric Car Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Cundao Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Cundao Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Baoding Jindi Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Baoding Jindi Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Information

  • About Us

Store Info

Address:
4578 Marmora Road, Glasgow, D04 89GR
Phones:
800
We are open:

E-mail: kimibetters@gmail.com

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

Get all the latest information on Events, Sales and Offers. Sign up for newsletter today.

Powered By News Top © 2026