zemez1039

Phones: 800
    • Shopping Cart
    • Checkout
News Top
  • Company Center
  • Featured Companies
  • Newest Companies
  • Recommended Companies

Shenzhen Y&J Electronic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

10.07.26 0 Comments Posted by

Executive Summary

Shenzhen Y&j Electronic Co., Ltd. is a Guangdong-based electronics supplier with a reported factory area of 3,300+ m² and 60+ staff. The company shows a moderate production footprint and has supplier verification status, which supports a reasonable level of operational credibility. Its platform profile is strong, with 18 years as a Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance support, and listed service/quality tags including Finished Product Inspection, ODM service, Full Customization, and Warranty available. Business performance is also measurable, with 200+ orders and CN¥878.9K+ transaction value over the past six months, supported by a 4.7 store rating and 60+ reviews. Delivery reliability is strong, with a 95.9% on-time dispatch rate. Overall, this supplier appears suitable for buyers seeking electronic components or display-related products with low MOQ flexibility and platform-backed transaction protection. Key limitations include limited disclosed detail on formal factory certifications, production capacity metrics, and deeper quality system documentation.

Shenzhen Y&j Electronic Co., Ltd.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength — 20 Points

Basis

  • Factory location: Guangdong, China
  • Factory area: 3,300+ m²
  • Employees: 60+ staff
  • Verified supplier: True
  • Product scope shown includes industrial motherboard and LCD/display-related electronic products
  • Formal factory certification details: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier has a moderate physical operating scale, with over 3,300 m² of factory area and more than 60 employees. This indicates a real production or operational base rather than a purely small trading setup. The verified supplier status adds credibility to the company’s existence and basic operational profile. However, the available data does not provide detailed information on production lines, monthly capacity, machinery, R&D team size, warehouse capacity, or internationally recognized factory certifications such as ISO. Therefore, while the supplier appears to have stable basic operating strength, the depth of manufacturing capability cannot be fully confirmed from the provided information.

Scoring Rationale

Based on the scoring standard, the company fits best into the “medium stable factory” category rather than a large-scale supply chain. The factory size and employee count are sufficient for moderate-volume supply, and verification status improves confidence. However, the absence of detailed production scale data and formal factory certification information prevents it from reaching the 18–20 range.

Final Score

15 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility — 20 Points

Basis

  • Gold Supplier: True
  • Gold Supplier duration: 18 years
  • Trade Assurance: True
  • Supplier verification: True
  • Platform/industry tags: Warranty available, Finished Product Inspection, ODM service available, Full Customization

Elaboration

The supplier demonstrates a strong platform credibility profile. An 18-year Gold Supplier history is a significant indicator of long-term platform presence. Trade Assurance support provides additional transaction protection for buyers. The supplier also carries multiple relevant service and quality-related platform tags, including Finished Product Inspection and Warranty available, which strengthen buyer confidence. The presence of ODM and Full Customization tags suggests platform-recognized service capability, although the provided data does not include details of completed ODM projects or customization case studies.

Scoring Rationale

This dimension is one of the supplier’s strongest areas. The combination of long Gold Supplier tenure, Trade Assurance, supplier verification, and multiple relevant platform tags reflects a mature compliance profile. Minor limitations remain because the data does not provide detailed third-party audit reports or specific certification documents beyond platform-level indicators.

Final Score

19 / 20

3. Business Performance — 20 Points

Basis

  • Orders in past 6 months: 200+
  • Transaction value in past 6 months: CN¥878.9K+
  • Store rating: 4.7
  • Reviews: 60+

Elaboration

The supplier has recorded over 200 orders and more than CN¥878.9K in transactions during the past six months. This indicates active commercial operations and recurring buyer engagement. A 4.7 store rating is positive and suggests generally satisfactory customer experience. The 60+ review count provides some market validation, though it is not large enough to be considered extensive feedback volume for high-confidence benchmarking.

Scoring Rationale

The order count is solid, and the transaction value demonstrates meaningful recent activity. The store rating is favorable, but the review base remains moderate rather than large. Therefore, the supplier shows stable business performance with credible transaction evidence, but it does not fully reach the highest tier reserved for suppliers with very high transaction volume, very large review counts, and consistently top-level ratings.

Final Score

17 / 20

4. Service Capability — 10 Points

Basis

  • Communication response time: ≤2h
  • Full Customization: Available
  • ODM service: Available
  • Warranty available: Listed

Elaboration

The supplier provides a response time of within two hours, which is commercially acceptable for most sourcing communications. The presence of Full Customization and ODM service tags indicates that the supplier can support customized requirements at least at the platform-disclosed level. Warranty availability also improves after-sales service confidence. However, the response time is not listed as ≤1 hour, and no detailed information is provided regarding engineering support, customization workflow, sample lead time, or technical documentation capability.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier demonstrates good service capability due to fast response and customization-related service tags. However, under the defined scoring standard, the highest 9–10 range is best suited for suppliers responding within one hour and showing strong customization capacity. Since the response time is ≤2h, the supplier is better positioned in the upper part of the normal-response category.

Final Score

8 / 10

5. Delivery Performance — 10 Points

Basis

  • On-time dispatch rate: 95.9%

Elaboration

A 95.9% on-time dispatch rate is a strong delivery performance indicator. It suggests that the supplier has a reliable order handling and dispatch process on the platform. This is especially important for buyers sourcing electronic products where project timelines, maintenance schedules, or replacement needs may require dependable shipment execution.

Scoring Rationale

According to the scoring standard, an on-time dispatch rate above 90% qualifies for the 9–10 point range. At 95.9%, the supplier clearly meets this threshold. While the data does not include average lead time, logistics methods, or delayed shipment causes, the disclosed dispatch rate is strong enough to justify a high score.

Final Score

10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback — 20 Points

Basis

  • Store rating: 4.7
  • Reviews: 60+
  • Finished Product Inspection: Available
  • Verified supplier: True
  • Warranty available: Listed
  • Detailed quality certifications: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier has a positive store rating of 4.7 and more than 60 reviews, indicating a generally favorable customer feedback profile. Finished Product Inspection is listed, which is an important quality assurance indicator. Warranty availability also supports buyer confidence in post-sale handling. The verified supplier status adds another layer of credibility. However, the available data does not disclose detailed quality management certifications, inspection procedures, defect rate, return rate, product compliance standards, or third-party test reports.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has a good customer feedback foundation and basic quality assurance indicators. The rating is positive, and Finished Product Inspection is a valuable quality-related tag. However, the review quantity is moderate rather than extensive, and the absence of detailed formal quality system documentation limits the score from reaching the highest band.

Final Score

17 / 20

Total Score

Dimension Score
Company Strength 15 / 20
Platform & Compliance Credibility 19 / 20
Business Performance 17 / 20
Service Capability 8 / 10
Delivery Performance 10 / 10
Quality & Customer Feedback 17 / 20
Total 86 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Recommendation: Recommended for cooperation, with controlled initial order validation.

Shenzhen Y&j Electronic Co., Ltd. is suitable for buyers looking for electronic components, industrial motherboard-related products, and LCD/display-related replacement products with low MOQ purchasing flexibility. The supplier is especially appropriate for small to medium-sized buyers, maintenance buyers, project-based procurement teams, and customers who value Trade Assurance protection and responsive communication.

The supplier’s main strengths are its long 18-year Gold Supplier history, Trade Assurance support, verified supplier status, strong on-time dispatch rate of 95.9%, and recent transaction activity of 200+ orders over six months. These factors provide a solid commercial and platform credibility foundation.

Main risks include limited disclosed information on formal factory certifications, detailed production capacity, quality management systems, and specific technical compliance documents. For first-time cooperation, buyers should request product specifications, inspection reports, warranty terms, and sample confirmation before bulk purchasing.

Overall, the supplier shows strong platform credibility, stable commercial activity, and good delivery reliability, with growth potential if it can provide more transparent factory certification and quality documentation.

  • Comments

Comments

Leave your comment
Cancel reply

Note: HTML is not translated!

Submit comment

Most popular Blog

Shenzhen Xinnanming Electronic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Xinnanming Electronic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Sunjet Electronic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Sunjet Electronic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Ysap Electronic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Ysap Electronic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Noyafa Electronic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Noyafa Electronic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Gilong Electronic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Gilong Electronic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Tuozhi Electronic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Tuozhi Electronic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Leadingplus Electronic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Leadingplus Electronic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Yuanchuangli Electronic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Yuanchuangli Electronic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Merpower Electronic Co.,Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Merpower Electronic Co.,Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Konsta Electronic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Konsta Electronic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Wochuan Electronic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Wochuan Electronic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Bestview Electronic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Bestview Electronic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Kiosk Electronic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Kiosk Electronic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Bolergifts Electronic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Bolergifts Electronic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen T.D.S Electronic Technology Co., Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen T.D.S Electronic Technology Co., Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Xinyi Electronic Digital Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Xinyi Electronic Digital Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Xinghongtu Electronic Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Xinghongtu Electronic Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Sinhor Electronic Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Sinhor Electronic Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Danone Xintong Electronic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Danone Xintong Electronic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Henan Hengfu Machinery Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Henan Hengfu Machinery Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Blog You May Like

Guangdong Chuanggao Vacuum Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Chuanggao Vacuum Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Kunshan Lanxinxi New Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Kunshan Lanxinxi New Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Ctechi Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Ctechi Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yueqing Xianglang Electric Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yueqing Xianglang Electric Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Engineering Plastics Industries (Group) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Engineering Plastics Industries (Group) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Honggang Machinery Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Honggang Machinery Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xuzhou Onasen Network Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xuzhou Onasen Network Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Huzhou Dayou Plastic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Huzhou Dayou Plastic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Luohe High Mechanical Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Luohe High Mechanical Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shengzhou First Garment & Necktie Apparel Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shengzhou First Garment & Necktie Apparel Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Cundao Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Cundao Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wenzhou Langtong Electric Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wenzhou Langtong Electric Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jinan Hongju Security Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jinan Hongju Security Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Longkou Forever Developed Metal Product Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Longkou Forever Developed Metal Product Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Tianjin Winture New Energy Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Tianjin Winture New Energy Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Puye Building Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Puye Building Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Infinite Beauty Technology Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Infinite Beauty Technology Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Wuxi East Ai Machinery Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Wuxi East Ai Machinery Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Ruihui Automation System (Guangdong) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ruihui Automation System (Guangdong) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Nanjing Giant Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Nanjing Giant Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Information

  • About Us

Store Info

Address:
4578 Marmora Road, Glasgow, D04 89GR
Phones:
800
We are open:

E-mail: kimibetters@gmail.com

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

Get all the latest information on Events, Sales and Offers. Sign up for newsletter today.

Powered By News Top © 2026