zemez1039

Phones: 800
    • Shopping Cart
    • Checkout
News Top
  • Company Center
  • Featured Companies
  • Newest Companies
  • Recommended Companies

Suzhou Aimanshi Wedding Dress Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

10.07.26 0 Comments Posted by

Supplier Evaluation Report: Suzhou Aimanshi Wedding Dress Co., Ltd.

Suzhou Aimanshi Wedding Dress Co., Ltd.

Executive Summary

Suzhou Aimanshi Wedding Dress Co., Ltd. is a China-based wedding apparel supplier located in Jiangsu Province, offering wedding veils and wedding dresses with low minimum order quantities of 1 piece. The supplier has a small-scale production profile, with a reported factory area of 1,200+㎡ and 20+ staff, but it is marked as a verified supplier and provides platform-backed services including Trade Assurance, Finished Product Inspection, ODM service, Full Customization, and Minor Customization. Its Gold Supplier history is relatively short at 1 year. Business performance is still limited, with 8 orders and CN¥33.8K+ transaction value over the past six months, while customer review data is absent. The supplier is suitable for small-batch buyers, bridal boutiques, sample testing, customized wedding apparel sourcing, and buyers requiring low MOQ flexibility. Key risks include limited transaction scale, no available customer reviews, missing store rating data, and relatively small factory size.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength — 20 Points

Basis

  • Factory location: Jiangsu Province, China
  • Factory area: 1,200+㎡
  • Employee count: 20+ staff
  • Verified supplier: True

Elaboration

The supplier operates from a reported factory space of over 1,200 square meters with more than 20 staff members. This indicates an operational production base, but the scale remains relatively small compared with larger apparel manufacturers. The presence of verified supplier status provides a positive signal that the company has passed some level of platform or supplier verification. However, the available data does not show large-scale production capacity, multiple workshops, automated production lines, annual output volume, or major factory certifications beyond the verified supplier status.

Scoring Rationale

The company demonstrates basic manufacturing capability and a verified supplier profile, which supports its credibility as an operational supplier. However, the factory size and staff count suggest a small-scale operation rather than a large or medium-sized production base. For wedding dresses and veils, smaller workshops can be suitable for flexible production and customization, but they may face limitations in handling large-volume or time-sensitive bulk orders. Because the supplier has verification but limited scale indicators, it fits the “small but with basic production capability” range.

Final Score

13 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility — 20 Points

Basis

  • Gold Supplier: True
  • Gold Supplier duration: 1 year
  • Trade Assurance: True
  • Certification / platform tags: Finished Product Inspection, ODM service available, Full Customization, Minor Customization
  • Verified supplier: True

Elaboration

The supplier has several important platform credibility indicators, including Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance support, and verified supplier status. The platform tags also show that the supplier supports inspection and customization-related services. However, the Gold Supplier duration is only 1 year, which limits long-term platform credibility. No additional independent certifications, such as ISO, BSCI, Sedex, OEKO-TEX, or other industry-specific compliance certifications, are provided in the data.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has the core platform protections expected for a basic credible supplier: Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance, verification, and service capability tags. These factors reduce initial sourcing risk. However, the short Gold Supplier history means the supplier has not yet built a long platform track record. The absence of broader factory or compliance certifications also prevents a higher score. Overall, this supplier has adequate platform credibility but does not yet qualify as a long-established or highly certified supplier.

Final Score

16 / 20

3. Business Performance — 20 Points

Basis

  • Orders in past 6 months: 8
  • Transaction value in past 6 months: CN¥33.8K+
  • Store rating: Insufficient Data
  • Number of reviews: 0

Elaboration

The supplier has recorded some transactional activity, with 8 orders and CN¥33.8K+ in transaction value over the past six months. This confirms that the supplier has received recent business through the platform. However, the order volume is low, and the transaction value is modest. More importantly, there is no available store rating and the review count is 0, which makes it difficult to validate buyer satisfaction, repeat purchasing behavior, or delivery and product consistency through public customer feedback.

Scoring Rationale

The business performance shows early-stage commercial activity rather than mature platform performance. The presence of recent orders and transaction value is positive, but the low order count and absence of customer reviews significantly limit commercial validation. Without rating data or buyer feedback, procurement teams cannot fully assess satisfaction levels or consistency across completed transactions. Therefore, the supplier falls into the lower business validation range, although not the weakest category because some transaction history is present.

Final Score

10 / 20

4. Service Capability — 10 Points

Basis

  • Communication response time: ≤3h
  • Full Customization: Available
  • Minor Customization: Available
  • ODM service: Available

Elaboration

The supplier provides several service capability indicators, including ODM service, Full Customization, and Minor Customization. These are highly relevant for wedding apparel sourcing, where buyers often require changes in size, fabric, veil length, dress structure, or design details. The response time is listed as within 3 hours, which indicates acceptable communication efficiency, though it does not reach the strongest level of ≤1 hour.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier demonstrates solid customization capability based on the available platform tags. For bridal products, this is a valuable strength because customized and low-MOQ orders are common. The response time of ≤3h is reasonable and commercially acceptable, but it is not fast enough to justify a top score under the provided criteria. The combination of normal response speed and strong customization capability supports an above-average service rating.

Final Score

8 / 10

5. Delivery Performance — 10 Points

Basis

  • On-time delivery rate: 85.7%

Elaboration

The supplier’s reported on-time delivery rate is 85.7%. This places the supplier within the 80%–89% performance band. The result indicates that the supplier generally meets delivery timelines, but there is still a measurable risk of delayed shipments. For wedding apparel, delivery reliability is particularly important because products are often needed for fixed event dates.

Scoring Rationale

Based strictly on the scoring standard, an on-time delivery rate between 80% and 89% corresponds to 7–8 points. At 85.7%, the supplier is in the middle-to-upper part of this band. The delivery performance is acceptable for small-batch or sample orders, but buyers with strict event deadlines should confirm lead times and shipping schedules before placing orders.

Final Score

8 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback — 20 Points

Basis

  • Store rating: Insufficient Data
  • Number of reviews: 0
  • Finished Product Inspection: Available
  • Verified supplier: True

Elaboration

The supplier has a Finished Product Inspection tag, which indicates that some level of product inspection is available before shipment. The verified supplier status also adds a basic layer of supplier credibility. However, no store rating is provided, and the number of customer reviews is 0. This creates a significant information gap in evaluating actual buyer satisfaction, product consistency, finishing quality, sizing accuracy, and after-sales handling.

Scoring Rationale

The presence of Finished Product Inspection is a positive quality-control indicator, especially for wedding apparel where appearance, stitching, fabric, and sizing are important. However, the lack of customer reviews and missing store rating substantially weaken the evidence base. Since there is no customer feedback to confirm quality performance, the supplier cannot be rated highly in this dimension. The score reflects basic quality assurance mechanisms but limited market-validated quality proof.

Final Score

12 / 20

Total Score

Dimension Score
Company Strength 13 / 20
Platform & Compliance Credibility 16 / 20
Business Performance 10 / 20
Service Capability 8 / 10
Delivery Performance 8 / 10
Quality & Customer Feedback 12 / 20
Total Score 67 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Recommendation: Conditional Cooperation Recommended

Suzhou Aimanshi Wedding Dress Co., Ltd. may be considered for small-batch sourcing, sample orders, low-MOQ procurement, customized wedding veils, and bridal dress trial orders. The supplier is particularly suitable for buyers who value flexibility, customization, and MOQ of 1 piece.

However, it is not yet strongly recommended for large-volume or high-risk time-sensitive procurement due to several limitations: small factory scale, only 1 year of Gold Supplier history, low recent order volume, 0 reviews, missing store rating data, and an on-time delivery rate of 85.7% rather than 90%+.

For procurement teams, the recommended approach is to start with sample orders or small trial batches, use Trade Assurance, confirm finished product inspection requirements, and clarify delivery timelines before scaling up. The supplier shows growth potential through customization services, ODM capability, platform verification, and inspection support, but stronger transaction history and customer feedback are needed before it can be treated as a fully validated long-term supplier.

  • Comments

Comments

Leave your comment
Cancel reply

Note: HTML is not translated!

Submit comment

Most popular Blog

Shenzhen Qimeihua Wedding Dress Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Qimeihua Wedding Dress Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhongshan Biaobai Wedding Dress Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhongshan Biaobai Wedding Dress Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Suzhou Guanhua Paper Factory Supplier Evaluation
Suzhou Guanhua Paper Factory Supplier Evaluation
Suzhou Youzhuyuan Container Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Suzhou Youzhuyuan Container Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Suzhou Xinhuilun Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Suzhou Xinhuilun Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Suzhou Minghuiyuan Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Suzhou Minghuiyuan Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Suzhou Tengda Container Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Suzhou Tengda Container Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Suzhou Zhijie Advertising Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Suzhou Zhijie Advertising Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Suzhou Koodle Tech Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Suzhou Koodle Tech Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Suzhou Zhongmaozhu Container Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Suzhou Zhongmaozhu Container Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Suzhou Jacket Textile Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Suzhou Jacket Textile Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Suzhou Nuotai Fashion Co, Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Suzhou Nuotai Fashion Co, Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Suzhou Huijin Textile Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Suzhou Huijin Textile Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Suzhou Kare Houseware Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Suzhou Kare Houseware Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Suzhou Puretal Electric Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Suzhou Puretal Electric Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Suzhou Kvc Electric Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Suzhou Kvc Electric Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Suzhou Nanovela Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Suzhou Nanovela Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Suzhou Kd Elevater Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Suzhou Kd Elevater Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hicen Tools (Suzhou) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hicen Tools (Suzhou) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Xinyifan Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Xinyifan Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Blog You May Like

Ningbo Shuaiwei Electric Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Shuaiwei Electric Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Suzhou Jinyun Business Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Suzhou Jinyun Business Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiashan Jianbo Sports Goods Co.,Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Jiashan Jianbo Sports Goods Co.,Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Senbi Home Electrical Appliances Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Senbi Home Electrical Appliances Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Ronghan Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Ronghan Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Tinlee Leather Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Tinlee Leather Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangxi Bno Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangxi Bno Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Nanhai Xiqiao Dingsheng Building Material Factory Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Nanhai Xiqiao Dingsheng Building Material Factory Supplier Evaluation
Zhengzhou Aite Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhengzhou Aite Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hubei Huanfu Plastic Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hubei Huanfu Plastic Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yantai Autbound Metal Product Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yantai Autbound Metal Product Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Czine Light Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Czine Light Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Linxi Import & Export Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Linxi Import & Export Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xuzhou Xirui Glass Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xuzhou Xirui Glass Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Heng Ning New Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Heng Ning New Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Baiji I&E Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Baiji I&E Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Hezhen Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Hezhen Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zibo Baoda Auto Parts Logistics Co. Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zibo Baoda Auto Parts Logistics Co. Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shantou City Dina Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shantou City Dina Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Yingdi Commercial Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Yingdi Commercial Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Information

  • About Us

Store Info

Address:
4578 Marmora Road, Glasgow, D04 89GR
Phones:
800
We are open:

E-mail: kimibetters@gmail.com

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

Get all the latest information on Events, Sales and Offers. Sign up for newsletter today.

Powered By News Top © 2026