Weifang Keyubo Waterproof Canvas Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Executive Summary

Weifang Keyubo Waterproof Canvas Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Shandong, with a reported factory area of 6,600+ sqm and 20+ staff. Based on the provided product listings, the company appears focused on waterproof canvas / PVC tarpaulin-related aquaculture products such as fish ponds and high-density aquaculture tanks. The supplier has basic platform credibility through Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance support, and verified supplier status, but its Gold Supplier history is short at 1 year. Commercial performance is still limited, with 10+ orders and CN¥33.8K+ transaction value over the past six months, while store rating is not provided and review count is 0. Service and delivery indicators are positive, especially response time within 2 hours and 100.0% on-time delivery. Overall, this supplier may be suitable for buyers seeking low-MOQ aquaculture pond products, sample orders, or early-stage sourcing validation, but larger buyers should conduct further quality and capacity checks before scaling procurement.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis
- Factory location: Shandong, China
- Factory area: 6,600+ sqm
- Employees: 20+ staff
- Verified supplier: True

Elaboration
The supplier has a reported physical factory base of over 6,600 sqm, which indicates a tangible production site rather than a purely trading-oriented profile. However, the staff size of 20+ suggests a relatively lean workforce. This combination points to a small-to-medium production operation with some physical capacity, but not enough data is available to confirm large-scale manufacturing capability, automation level, monthly output, or production line details.

Scoring Rationale
The verified supplier status strengthens confidence in the company’s basic legitimacy and factory presence. The factory area is reasonable, but the limited employee count restricts the assessment of production depth and scalability. Since there is no detailed information on production equipment, annual output, or factory certifications beyond verification, the supplier should not be classified as a large-scale stable supply chain. It fits better into the category of a smaller or lower-mid-size factory with basic production capability.

Final Score
14 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier duration: 1 year
- Trade Assurance: True
- Certification / industry tags: “Response time ≤2h”, “On-time delivery 100.0%”
- Verified supplier: True

Elaboration
The supplier has several important platform-level trust indicators, including Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance support, and verified supplier status. These factors provide a baseline level of platform credibility. However, the Gold Supplier duration is only 1 year, which limits the ability to assess long-term platform stability. The provided tags relate mainly to service and delivery performance rather than independent product certifications or industry-specific compliance documentation.

Scoring Rationale
The presence of Gold Supplier status and Trade Assurance makes the supplier more credible than an unverified or unsupported seller. Verified supplier status also improves platform trust. However, the short Gold Supplier history and lack of detailed certification records prevent a higher score. There is insufficient data on product compliance certificates, factory audit scope, or third-party quality certifications.

Final Score
15 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis
- Orders in past 6 months: 10+
- Transaction value in past 6 months: CN¥33.8K+
- Store rating: Insufficient Data
- Review count: 0

Elaboration
The supplier has recorded some commercial activity over the past six months, with more than 10 orders and transaction value above CN¥33.8K. This confirms that the store has had recent buyers and completed transactions. However, the scale remains modest, and the lack of reviews creates a gap in customer-side validation. The missing store rating also makes it difficult to evaluate buyer satisfaction or service consistency.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier demonstrates basic transaction activity, but the order volume and transaction value are not high enough to indicate strong market traction. More importantly, the absence of customer reviews and unavailable store rating significantly weakens commercial validation. This makes the business performance profile relatively early-stage or low-volume based on the available data.

Final Score
10 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis
- Communication response time: ≤2h
- Full Customization: Insufficient Data
- Communication efficiency: supported only by response-time data

Elaboration
The supplier’s response time of within 2 hours is a positive service indicator and suggests relatively active communication on the platform. This is useful for buyers requiring quotation clarification, sample discussion, or order coordination. However, the data does not confirm whether the supplier supports Full Customization, design modification, private labeling, packaging customization, or technical drawings.

Scoring Rationale
The response time is good but does not meet the highest benchmark of ≤1 hour. Since customization capability is not provided, the supplier cannot be scored as having strong service flexibility. The score reflects responsive communication but only limited evidence of broader service capability.

Final Score
7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis
- On-time delivery rate: 100.0%

Elaboration
The supplier reports a 100.0% on-time delivery rate, which is a strong delivery indicator within the provided data. This suggests that recent fulfilled orders were shipped according to the agreed schedule. For buyers, this is a positive signal, especially when sourcing bulky or production-linked products such as tarpaulin fish ponds and aquaculture tanks.

Scoring Rationale
According to the scoring standard, an on-time delivery rate above 90% qualifies for the 9–10 point range. Since the reported rate is 100.0%, the supplier receives the maximum score in this dimension. However, this should still be interpreted alongside the relatively low order count, because delivery reliability has not yet been proven across a large transaction base.

Final Score
10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis
- Store rating: Insufficient Data
- Review count: 0
- Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
- Factory / supplier verification: True

Elaboration
The supplier has verified supplier status, which provides some basic confidence in company legitimacy and factory presence. However, customer feedback data is weak because there are no reviews and no store rating provided. There is also no information confirming Finished Product Inspection or other specific quality control processes. As a result, quality assurance cannot be fully evaluated from the current dataset.

Scoring Rationale
The lack of customer reviews and missing store rating are major limitations for assessing actual buyer satisfaction. Verified supplier status is a positive factor, but it does not replace product-level quality evidence or inspection records. Because Finished Product Inspection information is unavailable, the supplier’s quality control system remains insufficiently validated.

Final Score
10 / 20

Total Score

66 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Cooperation is conditionally recommended for low-risk or small-batch procurement, especially for buyers seeking low-MOQ aquaculture pond or PVC tarpaulin fish-farming products. The supplier is suitable for sample orders, trial purchases, and price comparison projects where Trade Assurance can be used to reduce transaction risk.

The main risks are limited customer feedback, no available store rating, 0 reviews, modest recent transaction value, and insufficient data on Finished Product Inspection or detailed quality certifications. These gaps make the supplier less suitable for immediate large-volume procurement without further verification.

Growth potential exists because the supplier has a verified profile, Trade Assurance, responsive communication, and excellent reported on-time delivery. Before scaling orders, buyers should request product specifications, inspection standards, production photos or videos, sample confirmation, and written quality requirements through the platform.