zemez1039

Phones: 800
    • Shopping Cart
    • Checkout
News Top
  • Company Center
  • Featured Companies
  • Newest Companies
  • Recommended Companies

Weifang Kaijie Packaging Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

10.07.26 0 Comments Posted by

Executive Summary

Weifang Kaijie Packaging Equipment Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Shandong, offering packaging-related equipment such as a hot melt glue binding machine. Based on the provided data, the company appears to be a small-scale but commercially active supplier, with a factory area of 1,100+ m² and 10+ staff. Its platform profile shows a 3-year Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance support, verified supplier status, and relevant service/quality labels including warranty availability, ODM service, OEM for well-known brands, and finished product inspection. Business performance is relatively solid for its size, with 100+ orders and CN¥540.9K+ transaction value over the past six months. The store rating of 4.6 with 30+ reviews indicates generally positive but not yet large-scale customer validation. The supplier is most suitable for buyers seeking small to medium-volume sourcing with platform-backed transaction protection and basic quality assurance, while larger buyers should further verify production capacity and customization depth.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis:
- Factory location: Shandong, China
- Factory area: 1,100+ m²
- Employees: 10+ staff
- Verified supplier: True

Elaboration:
The supplier has a physical factory footprint of over 1,100 m² and a workforce of more than 10 staff. This indicates that the company has basic production and operational capacity, but the scale remains relatively small compared with larger industrial equipment manufacturers. The verified supplier status provides some level of credibility regarding the company’s existence and operational presence.

Scoring Rationale:
The company does not demonstrate large-scale manufacturing capacity based on the provided factory area and employee count. However, it has a defined factory location, measurable production space, staff, and verified supplier status, which supports a basic level of operational reliability. The available data fits the category of a small supplier with foundational production capability rather than a large or medium-sized stable supply chain.

Final Score: 12 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis:
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier duration: 3 years
- Trade Assurance: True
- Verified supplier: True
- Certification/industry labels: Warranty available, OEM for well-known brands, Finished product inspection, ODM service available

Elaboration:
The supplier has a complete set of basic credibility indicators, including Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance, and verified supplier information. The 3-year Gold Supplier history shows some continuity on the platform, although it is not yet a long-term track record. The listed labels also strengthen the supplier’s commercial credibility, particularly warranty availability, ODM service, and finished product inspection.

Scoring Rationale:
The platform credibility is relatively strong because core trust mechanisms are present: Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance, verification, and multiple platform labels. However, the Gold Supplier duration is only 3 years, which limits the score compared with suppliers that have a longer verified platform history. The certification and compliance information is useful, but no additional third-party management system certifications are provided.

Final Score: 17 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis:
- Orders in the past 6 months: 100+
- Transaction value in the past 6 months: CN¥540.9K+
- Store rating: 4.6
- Reviews: 30+

Elaboration:
The supplier has recorded more than 100 orders and over CN¥540.9K in transaction value in the past six months. This suggests active commercial operations and a certain level of buyer acceptance. The store rating of 4.6 is positive, while the review count of 30+ provides some customer feedback base, though it is not large enough to be considered extensive market validation.

Scoring Rationale:
The supplier shows stable transaction activity and moderate commercial traction. The order volume and transaction value are meaningful for a small supplier, and the rating is favorable. However, the review base remains limited, and the transaction scale does not indicate a high-volume or highly mature supplier. Therefore, the business performance is assessed as stable but not top-tier.

Final Score: 16 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis:
- Communication response time: ≤3h
- ODM service available
- Full Customization: Insufficient Data

Elaboration:
A response time within three hours indicates acceptable communication efficiency for procurement engagement. The availability of ODM service suggests that the supplier may support some level of product development or adaptation. However, the provided data does not explicitly confirm Full Customization capability, so this cannot be assumed.

Scoring Rationale:
The supplier demonstrates reasonable service responsiveness and has ODM-related capability listed. However, since the response time is not within one hour and Full Customization is not explicitly confirmed, the service capability should be rated as moderate rather than strong. The score reflects adequate communication and some customization support, with limitations due to incomplete customization data.

Final Score: 7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis:
- On-time shipment rate: 100.0%

Elaboration:
The supplier reports a 100.0% on-time shipment rate. Based on the provided scoring standard, this exceeds the 90% threshold required for the highest scoring range. This is a positive indicator for buyers concerned with order fulfillment reliability.

Scoring Rationale:
A 100.0% on-time shipment rate supports a strong delivery performance assessment. Since no negative delivery indicators are provided, the supplier qualifies for the top delivery score range. However, the underlying shipment sample size is not provided, so the interpretation should remain limited to the available platform data.

Final Score: 10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis:
- Store rating: 4.6
- Reviews: 30+
- Finished product inspection: Listed
- Verified supplier: True
- Factory Verification: Insufficient Data beyond verified supplier status

Elaboration:
The supplier has a generally positive customer rating of 4.6 and more than 30 reviews. The finished product inspection label is a useful quality-control indicator, suggesting that final inspection is part of the supplier’s stated process. Verified supplier status also adds credibility, although the data does not provide detailed factory audit reports or specific quality management certifications.

Scoring Rationale:
The supplier has good customer feedback and a basic quality assurance indicator through finished product inspection. However, the review count is moderate rather than extensive, and there is insufficient data on detailed factory verification scope, inspection standards, defect rates, or formal quality certifications. The quality profile is therefore positive but not fully mature.

Final Score: 16 / 20

Total Score

Company Strength: 12 / 20
Platform & Compliance Credibility: 17 / 20
Business Performance: 16 / 20
Service Capability: 7 / 10
Delivery Performance: 10 / 10
Quality & Customer Feedback: 16 / 20

Total Score: 78 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Cooperation is recommended with controlled order sizes and proper pre-shipment verification. The supplier is most suitable for small to medium-sized buyers seeking packaging equipment with Trade Assurance protection, moderate transaction history, responsive communication, and basic quality safeguards.

Main risk points include limited factory scale, small workforce, moderate review volume, and insufficient data on Full Customization, formal factory audit scope, and detailed quality management certifications. For larger-volume procurement or highly customized projects, buyers should request additional documentation such as factory audit details, production capacity records, inspection reports, and customization case evidence before placing major orders.

Growth potential is present due to the supplier’s active six-month transaction record, 100.0% on-time shipment rate, platform verification, and listed ODM/inspection capabilities. However, its current profile is better aligned with cautious sourcing and progressive supplier development rather than immediate large-scale strategic procurement.

  • Comments

Comments

Leave your comment
Cancel reply

Note: HTML is not translated!

Submit comment

Most popular Blog

Weifang U-Best Husbandry Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Weifang U-Best Husbandry Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Weifang Huazhong Power Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Weifang Huazhong Power Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Kaijie Sports Goods Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Kaijie Sports Goods Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Weifang Galin Powder Coating Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Weifang Galin Powder Coating Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Weifang Hengyuan Environmental Water Treatment Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Weifang Hengyuan Environmental Water Treatment Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Weifang Jielong Textile Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Weifang Jielong Textile Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Weifang Botai Textile Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Weifang Botai Textile Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Weifang Js Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Weifang Js Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Weifang Longwell Machinery Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Weifang Longwell Machinery Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Weifang Jyd Steel Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Weifang Jyd Steel Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Orient Aluminium (Weifang) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Orient Aluminium (Weifang) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Weifang Jinhai Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Weifang Jinhai Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Weifang Flt Chain Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Weifang Flt Chain Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Qianxun Packaging Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Qianxun Packaging Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Dingjin Packaging Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Dingjin Packaging Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Fuyun Packaging (Guangzhou) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Fuyun Packaging (Guangzhou) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Gongying Packaging Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Gongying Packaging Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hunan Xiangnian Packaging Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hunan Xiangnian Packaging Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Ishine Packaging Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Ishine Packaging Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Xiho Energy Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Xiho Energy Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Blog You May Like

Zhangqiu City Hongdun Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhangqiu City Hongdun Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Changchun Shoes Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Changchun Shoes Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xi An Green Source Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xi An Green Source Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Huanghua Yuandaxin Animal Husbandry Machinery Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Huanghua Yuandaxin Animal Husbandry Machinery Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Bofeng Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Bofeng Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Yanshuoda Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Yanshuoda Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shijiazhuang Longgong Plastic Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shijiazhuang Longgong Plastic Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shijiazhuang Peige Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shijiazhuang Peige Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qinghe County Xinan Auto Spare Parts Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qinghe County Xinan Auto Spare Parts Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Xingdou Intelligent Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Xingdou Intelligent Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangsu Polygee Environmental Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangsu Polygee Environmental Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Benhao Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Benhao Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jinjiang Chenle Shoes And Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jinjiang Chenle Shoes And Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dingzhou City Liangyou Metal Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dingzhou City Liangyou Metal Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Qianduomu Intelligent Decoration Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Qianduomu Intelligent Decoration Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingdao Aofeng Construction Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingdao Aofeng Construction Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Ace Architectural Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Ace Architectural Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Dakun Wire Mesh Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Dakun Wire Mesh Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Rongxingda Polymer Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Rongxingda Polymer Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zero Technologies Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zero Technologies Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Information

  • About Us

Store Info

Address:
4578 Marmora Road, Glasgow, D04 89GR
Phones:
800
We are open:

E-mail: kimibetters@gmail.com

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

Get all the latest information on Events, Sales and Offers. Sign up for newsletter today.

Powered By News Top © 2026