zemez1039

Phones: 800
    • Shopping Cart
    • Checkout
News Top
  • Company Center
  • Featured Companies
  • Newest Companies
  • Recommended Companies

Zhejiang Monro M&E Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

10.07.26 0 Comments Posted by

Supplier Evaluation Report: Zhejiang Monro M&E Co., Ltd.

Zhejiang Monro M&E Co., Ltd.

Executive Summary

Zhejiang Monro M&E Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Zhejiang, with a reported factory area of over 29,000㎡ and more than 230 staff. The company appears to have a solid manufacturing foundation for pressure control switches and automatic pump control-related products based on the listed product portfolio. Its platform credibility is strong, supported by 11 years as an Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance availability, and supplier verification status. The supplier also lists customization-related service tags, including Full Customization, ODM service, and Minor Customization.

However, its recent commercial performance on the platform is relatively limited, with 10 orders and CN¥27K+ transaction value over the past six months. Customer feedback is positive with a 4.8 store rating, but the review base is small at only 7 reviews. Overall, this supplier is suitable for buyers seeking a verified manufacturing partner with customization capability, but procurement teams should further validate production capacity, quality control processes, and sample performance before large-scale purchasing.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis

  • Company: Zhejiang Monro M&E Co., Ltd.
  • Country: China
  • Province: Zhejiang
  • Factory area: 29,000+㎡
  • Employees: 230+ staff
  • Verified supplier / factory verification status: True
  • Listed products include pressure control switches and automatic pump control products.

Elaboration

The supplier has a clearly stated physical production base with a factory area exceeding 29,000㎡ and a workforce of more than 230 employees. This indicates a meaningful manufacturing scale rather than a very small trading operation. The presence of factory or supplier verification further strengthens the credibility of the company’s operational base.

The listed product range is concentrated around pressure control switches and automatic pump control-related products, suggesting a focused product category rather than a highly fragmented catalog. However, the provided data does not include annual production capacity, number of production lines, machinery details, export markets, or specific factory audit certificates beyond the verification status.

Scoring Rationale

The factory size and employee count support the assessment that this is at least a medium-sized and potentially large-scale manufacturing supplier. The verification status also improves confidence in its physical and operational presence. However, because the data does not include detailed production capacity, equipment information, or formal factory audit certifications, it is not appropriate to assign the maximum score. The supplier demonstrates strong basic production capability, but some capacity-related information remains insufficient.

Final Score

18 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis

  • Gold Supplier: True
  • Gold Supplier duration: 11 years
  • Trade Assurance: True
  • Verification status: True
  • Certification / platform tags:
  • Warranty available
  • Full customization
  • ODM service available
  • Minor customization

Elaboration

The supplier has maintained Gold Supplier status for 11 years, which is a strong platform credibility indicator. Trade Assurance availability provides an additional transaction protection mechanism for buyers. The supplier also has verification status, which supports platform-level credibility.

The listed service and certification-related tags show that the supplier presents itself as capable of offering warranty support, customization, ODM service, and minor customization. These are useful commercial and service indicators. However, the provided data does not include specific international product certifications, such as CE, UL, ISO, RoHS, or other industry-specific compliance documents. Therefore, compliance credibility is strong from a platform perspective, but product-level regulatory compliance cannot be confirmed from the supplied information.

Scoring Rationale

The 11-year Gold Supplier history, Trade Assurance support, and verification status together represent a strong platform credibility profile. This exceeds the level of a newly registered or minimally verified supplier. However, because the supplied data does not provide detailed third-party product certifications or complete compliance documentation, a perfect score would not be justified. The supplier is highly credible on the platform but still requires further compliance document review for regulated procurement.

Final Score

19 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis

  • Orders in the past 6 months: 10
  • Transaction value in the past 6 months: CN¥27K+
  • Store rating: 4.8
  • Number of reviews: 7

Elaboration

The supplier has a positive store rating of 4.8, indicating favorable buyer feedback among available reviews. However, the number of reviews is limited, with only 7 reviews shown. Recent transaction activity is also relatively modest, with 10 orders and CN¥27K+ in transaction value over the past six months.

This suggests that while the supplier has completed transactions and maintained a good rating, its recent platform-visible business scale is not high. The data does not show high order volume, high transaction value, or broad customer validation through a large review base. Therefore, the supplier’s operational credibility is supported, but its recent commercial traction on the platform appears limited.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has some verified commercial activity and a good store rating, which prevents it from being considered commercially unproven. However, 10 orders and CN¥27K+ over six months represent a relatively low transaction scale. The small number of reviews also limits the reliability of the rating as a broad performance indicator. As a result, the score should reflect basic but limited business validation rather than strong market performance.

Final Score

12 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis

  • Communication response time: ≤3 hours
  • Full Customization: Available
  • ODM service: Available
  • Minor customization: Available
  • Warranty available: Listed

Elaboration

The supplier’s response time is reported as within 3 hours, which is commercially acceptable and indicates reasonable communication efficiency. The availability of Full Customization, ODM service, and Minor Customization suggests that the supplier can support different levels of buyer-specific requirements, from minor adjustments to more customized development work.

However, the response time does not meet the strongest benchmark of less than or equal to 1 hour. Also, the provided data does not include dedicated engineering team size, sample lead time, after-sales response process, multilingual support, or project management capability. Therefore, service capability appears solid but not fully proven at a high-performance level.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier demonstrates good service readiness through customization and ODM-related tags, which are valuable for buyers seeking tailored pressure switch or pump control products. The ≤3h response time is acceptable but not top-tier. Because there is no additional evidence of advanced service infrastructure, the score should remain in the mid-to-upper range rather than the highest band.

Final Score

8 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis

  • On-time delivery rate: 100.0%

Elaboration

The supplier reports a 100.0% on-time delivery rate, which is a strong delivery performance indicator. Based on the scoring rules, any on-time delivery rate above 90% qualifies for the highest scoring range.

However, the data does not include the total shipment count behind this delivery rate, average lead time, delayed shipment history, or performance across peak seasons. Therefore, the available delivery metric is excellent, but its statistical depth cannot be further assessed from the supplied data.

Scoring Rationale

A 100.0% on-time shipment rate directly supports a top delivery performance score under the defined evaluation standard. While the absence of shipment volume data limits deeper validation, the provided metric itself is clear and highly favorable. Therefore, the supplier qualifies for the maximum score in this category.

Final Score

10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis

  • Store rating: 4.8
  • Number of reviews: 7
  • Verification status: True
  • Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
  • Factory Verification: True

Elaboration

The supplier has a favorable store rating of 4.8, which indicates positive customer feedback among the available review base. The factory or supplier verification status also supports a basic level of trust in the supplier’s operational presence. These are positive quality-related indicators.

However, the number of reviews is limited to 7, which means the feedback base is not large enough to strongly validate consistent quality performance across many customers or order batches. In addition, there is no provided information confirming Finished Product Inspection, quality management certifications, inspection procedures, defect rate, return rate, or third-party testing records. These missing data points limit the ability to fully assess the supplier’s quality assurance system.

Scoring Rationale

The high store rating and verification status support a positive quality impression, but the small review count and lack of Finished Product Inspection data prevent a high-end score. The supplier appears to have acceptable customer satisfaction based on available feedback, but its quality assurance system is not sufficiently documented in the provided data. Therefore, the score reflects good but not fully substantiated quality confidence.

Final Score

15 / 20

Total Score

Dimension Score
Company Strength 18 / 20
Platform & Compliance Credibility 19 / 20
Business Performance 12 / 20
Service Capability 8 / 10
Delivery Performance 10 / 10
Quality & Customer Feedback 15 / 20
Total Score 82 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Recommendation: Recommended for conditional cooperation.

Zhejiang Monro M&E Co., Ltd. shows strong supplier fundamentals, especially in factory scale, platform credibility, Trade Assurance support, supplier verification, and delivery performance. The supplier appears suitable for buyers seeking pressure control switches and automatic pump control-related products with customization or ODM requirements.

Suitable customer types:
- Buyers requiring a verified China-based manufacturer
- Importers or distributors sourcing pressure switch and pump control products
- Customers needing customization, ODM, or minor product modifications
- Buyers who prefer Trade Assurance-supported transactions

Main risk points:
- Recent six-month transaction volume is limited: 10 orders and CN¥27K+
- Review base is small, with only 7 reviews
- Finished Product Inspection information is not provided
- Product certification and regulatory compliance documents are Insufficient Data
- Detailed production capacity, lead time, and quality control procedures are not provided

Growth potential:
The supplier has a strong operational and platform foundation, supported by 29,000+㎡ factory space, 230+ staff, 11 years of Gold Supplier status, and 100.0% on-time delivery. If it can provide stronger quality documentation, inspection records, and product compliance certificates, it may become a more reliable candidate for larger-scale or long-term procurement programs.

  • Comments

Comments

Leave your comment
Cancel reply

Note: HTML is not translated!

Submit comment

Most popular Blog

Zhejiang J&J Mobility Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang J&J Mobility Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Hailiang Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Hailiang Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Waterpro Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Waterpro Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Fordy Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Fordy Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Firemax E-Commerce (Zhejiang) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Firemax E-Commerce (Zhejiang) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Kepai Electrical Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Kepai Electrical Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Litai Plastic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Litai Plastic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Niuli Electric Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Niuli Electric Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Chengcheng Plastic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Chengcheng Plastic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Tolerance Electric Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Tolerance Electric Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Neochi Electric Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Neochi Electric Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Yuxing Electric Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Yuxing Electric Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Ruicheng Plastic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Ruicheng Plastic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Pquan Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Pquan Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Tongzheng Electric Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Tongzheng Electric Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Naduo Commodity Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Naduo Commodity Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Kamei Stationery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Kamei Stationery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Moka Stationery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Moka Stationery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Sibuen Toys Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Sibuen Toys Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Ouyou Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Ouyou Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Blog You May Like

Linyi Fuji Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Linyi Fuji Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Taian Dongtai Machine Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Taian Dongtai Machine Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Ziwei Metal Product Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Ziwei Metal Product Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Nanchang Ruiji Trading Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Nanchang Ruiji Trading Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Henan Fadu Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Henan Fadu Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Lingshou Yongqi Mineral Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Lingshou Yongqi Mineral Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Henan Taiyan Building Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Henan Taiyan Building Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Uogele Decoration Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Uogele Decoration Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Nantong Litai Jianlong Food Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Nantong Litai Jianlong Food Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Dongye Automobile Accessories Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Dongye Automobile Accessories Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Dile Bear Amusement Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Dile Bear Amusement Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Changzhou Taiqi Refrigeration Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Changzhou Taiqi Refrigeration Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Aike Appliances Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Aike Appliances Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Hailiang International Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Hailiang International Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Beijing Hanbo Technology Development Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Beijing Hanbo Technology Development Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Kunshan Lanxinxi New Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Kunshan Lanxinxi New Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xuchang Vr Hot Crafts Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xuchang Vr Hot Crafts Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Pm  Mold Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Pm Mold Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Suzhou Beiang Smart Technology Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Suzhou Beiang Smart Technology Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Kende Mechanical &Electrical Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Kende Mechanical &Electrical Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Information

  • About Us

Store Info

Address:
4578 Marmora Road, Glasgow, D04 89GR
Phones:
800
We are open:

E-mail: kimibetters@gmail.com

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

Get all the latest information on Events, Sales and Offers. Sign up for newsletter today.

Powered By News Top © 2026