Zhongshan Jiaye Electric Appliance Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Executive Summary

Zhongshan Jiaye Electric Appliance Technology Co., Ltd. is a China-based microwave oven supplier located in Guangdong, with a reported factory area of 8,000+㎡ and 110+ staff. The company offers multiple microwave oven products, including countertop, built-in, convection, and household microwave models, with MOQ levels ranging from 100 to 500 pieces. From a procurement perspective, the supplier shows moderate production capability and basic platform credibility, supported by Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance, verified supplier status, Finished Product Inspection, Full Customization, Minor Customization, and ODM service availability. However, its commercial track record on the platform is very limited, with only 1 order and CN¥540.9+ transaction value in the past six months, no available store rating, and 0 reviews. This supplier may be suitable for buyers seeking preliminary sourcing, sample validation, or early-stage supplier development, but larger-volume procurement should require additional due diligence, factory audit confirmation, product compliance checks, and sample testing before commitment.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis
- Factory location: Guangdong, China
- Factory area: 8,000+㎡
- Employees: 110+ staff
- Verified supplier: True

Elaboration
The supplier has a documented physical manufacturing base with over 8,000㎡ of factory space and more than 110 employees. This indicates a functioning production organization rather than a very small trading-only operation. The verified supplier status also provides some basic confirmation of company presence and operational legitimacy.

Scoring Rationale
The company appears to have a medium-scale production foundation. The factory size and employee count are sufficient for basic and possibly moderate-volume microwave oven production, but the available data does not indicate very large-scale capacity, advanced automation, annual output, export volume, or named factory certifications. Therefore, it fits the “medium stable factory” range rather than the top tier.

Final Score
16 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier duration: 1 year
- Trade Assurance: True
- Certification / industry labels: Finished product inspection, Full customization, Minor customization, ODM service available
- Verified supplier: True

Elaboration
The supplier has several important platform credibility indicators, including Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance support, and verified supplier status. The listed service and quality-related labels also strengthen its platform profile, especially Finished Product Inspection and ODM service availability.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier has core platform protections and verification elements, but the Gold Supplier history is only 1 year, which limits long-term credibility assessment. Certification labels are useful, but there is no additional data showing international product certifications, third-party factory audit reports, or long-term platform transaction history. As a result, credibility is acceptable but not yet mature.

Final Score
15 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis
- Orders in the past 6 months: 1
- Transaction value in the past 6 months: CN¥540.9+
- Store rating: Insufficient Data
- Number of reviews: 0

Elaboration
The supplier’s recent platform transaction record is very limited. One order and a transaction value of CN¥540.9+ over six months indicate that the storefront has not yet demonstrated strong commercial traction. The absence of a store rating and customer reviews further limits visibility into buyer satisfaction and repeat purchasing behavior.

Scoring Rationale
Although the supplier has some verified platform presence, its business performance data is weak. The low order count, low transaction value, missing rating, and zero reviews mean there is insufficient commercial validation to support a high score. This represents a key procurement risk, particularly for buyers relying heavily on transaction history.

Final Score
8 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis
- Response time: ≤2h
- Full customization: Available
- Minor customization: Available
- ODM service: Available

Elaboration
The supplier shows a relatively responsive communication profile, with a response time of no more than two hours. The availability of Full Customization, Minor Customization, and ODM service suggests that it can support customized product requirements and buyer-specific development needs within the product category.

Scoring Rationale
The response time is good, though not within the strongest “≤1 hour” range. Customization capability is clearly indicated, which supports procurement flexibility for private-label or specification-based projects. Overall, the service capability appears solid, but not enough data is available on communication quality, engineering support depth, or project execution history.

Final Score
8 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis
- On-time delivery rate: 100.0%

Elaboration
The supplier reports a 100.0% on-time delivery rate, which is a strong delivery indicator under the provided scoring standard. This suggests that recorded shipments were completed within the expected timeframe.

Scoring Rationale
A 100.0% on-time delivery rate falls into the highest scoring band. However, this should be interpreted cautiously because the business performance data shows only 1 order in the past six months, meaning the delivery performance sample size is limited. The metric is positive, but not yet supported by broad transaction volume.

Final Score
10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis
- Finished Product Inspection: Available
- Verified supplier: True
- Store rating: Insufficient Data
- Number of reviews: 0
- Factory Verification: Insufficient Data beyond verified supplier status

Elaboration
The supplier has a Finished Product Inspection label, which is a positive quality-control indicator. Verified supplier status also provides some baseline credibility. However, customer-facing quality evidence is weak because there is no available store rating and no customer reviews. The data does not provide product defect rates, inspection reports, certification details, or buyer feedback.

Scoring Rationale
The presence of Finished Product Inspection supports a basic quality assurance framework, but the absence of ratings and reviews significantly limits confidence in actual customer satisfaction. Since customer feedback is a major part of this dimension, the supplier cannot be scored in the higher range despite having some quality-related platform labels.

Final Score
12 / 20

Total Score

69 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Cooperation can be considered, but only with controlled risk management. Zhongshan Jiaye Electric Appliance Technology Co., Ltd. is more suitable for buyers conducting early-stage supplier screening, sample procurement, small-batch trial orders, ODM inquiry validation, or customized microwave oven sourcing exploration. The main risks are limited recent transaction history, only 1 order in six months, very low transaction value, no store rating, and 0 customer reviews. Its growth potential lies in its medium-scale factory base, Guangdong location, customization capability, Trade Assurance support, Finished Product Inspection label, and 100.0% reported on-time delivery rate. For bulk procurement, buyers should request samples, inspection records, product compliance documents, production capacity evidence, and preferably conduct a factory audit before placing large orders.