Baoying County Yi Da Build Glass Crafts Factory Supplier Evaluation

Executive Summary

Baoying County Yi Da Build Glass Crafts Factory is a China-based glass crafts and drinkware supplier located in Jiangsu, with a stated factory area of 1,200+㎡ and 10+ staff. The supplier appears positioned as a small-scale manufacturer or workshop-style factory focused on glass drinkware and decorative glass products, including handmade, cartoon 3D, transparent, borosilicate, and creative trendy glass items. Its profile shows 4 years as a Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance support, verified supplier status, finished product inspection, ODM service availability, minor customization, and response time within 3 hours. Commercially, the supplier has recorded 20+ orders and CN¥540.9K+ transaction value over the past six months, with a 4.6 store rating but only 6 reviews. This indicates some verified transaction activity, though customer feedback volume remains limited. Overall, the supplier is more suitable for small to medium buyers, trial orders, niche glassware sourcing, and buyers requiring moderate customization rather than large-scale, high-volume procurement.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis:
- Factory area: 1,200+㎡
- Staff: 10+
- Verified supplier: True
- Country/region: Jiangsu, China

Elaboration:
The supplier has a clearly stated physical factory presence and verified supplier status, which provides a basic level of confidence in operational legitimacy. However, the factory size and employee count indicate a relatively small production base. There is no data on production lines, monthly capacity, machinery, annual output, export volume, or major factory certifications.

Scoring Rationale:
The company demonstrates basic manufacturing capability and a verified factory profile, but the limited factory area and small staff size restrict its perceived production scalability. It does not meet the profile of a large or mid-sized stable supply chain. The verified supplier status improves credibility, but insufficient data on production capacity prevents a higher score.

Final Score: 11 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis:
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier duration: 4 years
- Trade Assurance: True
- Certification/industry tags: Finished product inspection, ODM service available, Minor customization, Response time ≤3h
- Verified supplier: True

Elaboration:
The supplier has several important platform credibility indicators, including Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance, and verification. Four years of Gold Supplier history suggests some platform continuity, though it is not a long-established profile compared with suppliers with much longer platform tenure. Compliance-related tags are present, especially finished product inspection and customization-related capabilities.

Scoring Rationale:
The supplier has a solid platform credibility foundation: Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance, verification, and relevant operational tags. However, the certification data is limited to platform/industry tags, and there is no evidence of broader third-party certifications, factory audit reports, or internationally recognized compliance standards. This supports a good but not top-tier score.

Final Score: 16 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis:
- Orders in past 6 months: 20+
- Transaction value in past 6 months: CN¥540.9K+
- Store rating: 4.6
- Reviews: 6

Elaboration:
The supplier has demonstrated real transaction activity, with a moderate transaction value over the past six months. The number of orders is relatively low, while the transaction amount suggests some meaningful purchases may have occurred. The 4.6 rating is positive, but the review count is limited, reducing the reliability of customer feedback as a broad market validation signal.

Scoring Rationale:
Business performance is supported by visible transaction volume and a good store rating, but the limited order count and very small number of reviews prevent classification as a highly validated, high-volume supplier. The performance appears stable at a modest scale rather than strongly proven across many buyers.

Final Score: 14 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis:
- Communication response time: ≤3h
- Tags: ODM service available, Minor customization
- Full Customization: Insufficient Data

Elaboration:
The supplier provides a reasonable response time within 3 hours and offers ODM service and minor customization. This indicates the supplier can support some level of product adaptation or design-related cooperation. However, the data does not confirm Full Customization capability, and there is no information on English communication quality, dedicated account management, sample lead time, or design support process.

Scoring Rationale:
The response speed is acceptable but not within the strongest ≤1 hour category. Customization capability is present at a basic to moderate level through ODM and minor customization tags, but Full Customization is not confirmed. Therefore, the supplier fits the normal service capability range rather than the highest tier.

Final Score: 7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis:
- On-time delivery rate: 90.0%

Elaboration:
The supplier reports an on-time delivery rate of 90.0%, which is a positive delivery indicator. This suggests that most orders are shipped on schedule. However, there is no additional information on average lead time, logistics partners, delayed order handling, or delivery performance by destination market.

Scoring Rationale:
A 90.0% on-time delivery rate reaches the high-performance threshold under the provided scoring framework. Since the rate is exactly 90.0% and no negative delivery data is provided, the supplier deserves a strong delivery score, though not the maximum due to lack of supporting delivery detail.

Final Score: 9 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis:
- Store rating: 4.6
- Reviews: 6
- Finished product inspection: Present
- Verified supplier: True
- Factory Verification: Verified supplier status provided; detailed factory verification report is Insufficient Data

Elaboration:
The supplier has a good rating and a finished product inspection tag, which supports a basic quality assurance framework. Verified supplier status adds credibility to the supplier profile. However, only 6 reviews are available, which is a limited sample size for judging consistent customer satisfaction. No detailed defect rate, inspection report, quality management certification, or customer complaint history is provided.

Scoring Rationale:
The quality profile is generally positive but not deeply validated. Finished product inspection and a 4.6 rating support a reasonable score, while the low review count and lack of detailed quality system evidence limit confidence. The supplier appears to have basic quality safeguards but not enough data to confirm strong, mature quality control.

Final Score: 15 / 20

Total Score

72 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Cooperation is conditionally recommended for small to medium buyers, trial orders, niche glassware sourcing, and buyers seeking low MOQ or moderate ODM/minor customization. The supplier shows acceptable platform credibility, verified transaction activity, reasonable service response, and strong on-time delivery performance. Key risks include small factory scale, limited staff size, low review volume, insufficient production capacity data, and lack of detailed third-party quality or factory audit information. Growth potential exists if the supplier can improve review volume, disclose production capacity, strengthen quality documentation, and demonstrate broader customization capability. For large-volume or strict compliance-driven procurement, further factory audit, sample testing, and pre-shipment inspection are recommended before placing major orders.