zemez1039

Phones: 800
    • Shopping Cart
    • Checkout
News Top
  • Company Center
  • Featured Companies
  • Newest Companies
  • Recommended Companies

Beijing Xushida Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

18.07.26 0 Comments Posted by

Executive Summary

Beijing Xushida Technology Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Beijing with a reported factory area of 3,100+㎡, 20+ staff, and verified supplier status. Based on the provided product listings, the company appears to supply bowling-related equipment and related products, with low MOQs such as 2 sets for machinery-type items and 100 pairs for footwear-type products. Its profile shows 3 years as a Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance support, and platform tags including project solutions, warranty availability, 3D design capabilities, and low MOQ customization. Commercially, the supplier has recorded 10+ orders and CN¥743.7K+ transaction value in the past six months, supported by a 5.0 store rating but only 6 reviews. Delivery performance is strong, with a 100.0% on-time dispatch rate. Overall, this supplier is more suitable for small to mid-sized buyers seeking low-MOQ project procurement or equipment sourcing, while larger buyers should further verify production scalability, quality inspection processes, and customization depth before committing.

Beijing Xushida Technology Co., Ltd.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis:
- Factory area: 3,100+㎡
- Employees: 20+ staff
- Verified supplier: True
- Location: Beijing, China

Elaboration:
The supplier has a clearly stated physical production base and a verified supplier status, which provides a basic level of operational credibility. A factory area of 3,100+㎡ indicates a real manufacturing or assembly capacity, but the employee count of 20+ staff suggests a relatively small operating team rather than a large-scale industrial supplier. The data supports the conclusion that the company has foundational production capability, but it does not demonstrate large-scale labor capacity or extensive manufacturing depth.

Scoring Rationale:
The supplier is stronger than a purely trading or unverified entity because it has factory space and verified supplier status. However, the limited staff size restricts its perceived scalability. The available data supports classification as a small factory with basic production capability rather than a large or medium-sized stable supply chain.

Final Score: 12 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis:
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier duration: 3 years
- Trade Assurance: True
- Verified supplier: True
- Tags: Project solutions, Warranty available, 3D design capabilities, Low MOQ for customization

Elaboration:
The supplier has several meaningful platform credibility indicators, including Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance, and supplier verification. The 3-year Gold Supplier history indicates some platform continuity, though it is not long enough to be considered highly mature. The presence of tags such as warranty availability and project solutions improves procurement confidence, but no third-party product certifications or formal factory management certifications are provided in the dataset.

Scoring Rationale:
The supplier has the core platform trust mechanisms in place, including Trade Assurance and verification. However, the Gold Supplier history is moderate rather than long-term, and certification information beyond platform labels is insufficient. This places the supplier in the category of having solid but not fully comprehensive compliance credibility.

Final Score: 16 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis:
- Past 6-month orders: 10+
- Past 6-month transaction value: CN¥743.7K+
- Store rating: 5.0
- Review count: 6

Elaboration:
The supplier has measurable recent transaction activity, with over CN¥743.7K in six-month transaction value. This suggests that at least some buyers have completed meaningful purchases through the platform. However, the order count of 10+ is relatively limited, and only 6 reviews are available, which restricts the reliability of the performance sample. The 5.0 rating is positive, but the small review base prevents it from being treated as broad market validation.

Scoring Rationale:
The transaction value is relatively stronger than the order count, implying that some orders may involve higher-value equipment. Still, the limited number of orders and reviews means the business record is not yet highly validated. The supplier demonstrates moderate commercial performance but not enough volume or feedback depth for a high score.

Final Score: 14 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis:
- Communication response time: ≤2h
- Platform tags include 3D design capabilities and low MOQ for customization
- Full Customization: Insufficient Data

Elaboration:
The supplier’s response time of within 2 hours is acceptable and indicates relatively responsive communication. The platform tags suggest some project support and customization-related capability, particularly low MOQ customization and 3D design capabilities. However, the provided data does not confirm Full Customization support, so customization strength cannot be rated at the highest level.

Scoring Rationale:
The supplier appears responsive and has some customization-related service signals, but the response time is not within the ≤1 hour benchmark for top scoring. Since Full Customization is not confirmed, the service capability should be considered practical but not advanced.

Final Score: 7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis:
- On-time dispatch rate: 100.0%

Elaboration:
The supplier reports a 100.0% on-time dispatch rate, which is a strong delivery performance indicator. Based strictly on the provided data, there is no evidence of delivery delay issues. However, the dataset does not include the number of shipments behind this rate, so the strength of this indicator depends on the underlying shipment volume, which is not provided.

Scoring Rationale:
According to the scoring standard, an on-time dispatch rate above 90% qualifies for the highest scoring range. With a reported rate of 100.0%, the supplier earns a top score in this dimension, while noting that shipment sample size is not disclosed.

Final Score: 10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis:
- Store rating: 5.0
- Review count: 6
- Verified supplier: True
- Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
- Factory Verification: True

Elaboration:
The supplier has a perfect 5.0 store rating, which is positive, and verified supplier status adds a basic level of quality credibility. However, the review count is only 6, so customer feedback is not yet broad enough to strongly validate consistent quality performance. The dataset does not confirm Finished Product Inspection, product certifications, or detailed quality control processes.

Scoring Rationale:
The rating is strong, and factory/supplier verification supports basic quality confidence. However, the limited review volume and lack of Finished Product Inspection data prevent the supplier from being rated in the top quality tier. The available evidence supports a good but still partially under-verified quality profile.

Final Score: 15 / 20

Total Score

74 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Cooperation is conditionally recommended for small to mid-sized buyers, project-based purchasers, and buyers seeking low-MOQ bowling-related equipment or related products. The supplier shows credible platform backing, verified status, strong delivery performance, and acceptable recent transaction value.

Key risks include limited staff scale, relatively low order and review counts, insufficient data on Finished Product Inspection, and unconfirmed Full Customization capability. Growth potential exists due to its verified status, Trade Assurance support, project solution tags, 3D design capability label, and 100.0% on-time dispatch rate, but buyers should request additional documentation on production capacity, inspection procedures, and customization scope before placing larger-volume orders.

  • Comments

Comments

Leave your comment
Cancel reply

Note: HTML is not translated!

Submit comment

Most popular Blog

Beijing Huiyinda Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Beijing Huiyinda Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Teraysun Technology (Beijing) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Teraysun Technology (Beijing) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Beijing Jiacheng Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Beijing Jiacheng Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Beijing Hongshiji Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Beijing Hongshiji Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Beijing Perfectlaser Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Beijing Perfectlaser Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Beijing Alpicool Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Beijing Alpicool Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Beijing Dwin Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Beijing Dwin Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Beijing Feeleato Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Beijing Feeleato Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Beijing Zhongantaihua Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Beijing Zhongantaihua Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Beijing Bcd Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Beijing Bcd Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Beijing Beautysub Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Beijing Beautysub Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Trusus Technology (Beijing) Co., Limited Supplier Evaluation
Trusus Technology (Beijing) Co., Limited Supplier Evaluation
Beijing Solarbio Science & Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Beijing Solarbio Science & Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Beijing Rongheyuan Food Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Beijing Rongheyuan Food Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Beijing Yuwei Photoeletric Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Beijing Yuwei Photoeletric Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Beijing Hanbo Technology Development Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Beijing Hanbo Technology Development Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Beijing Dazheng Yongye Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Beijing Dazheng Yongye Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Beijing Mkt Medicine Science And Technology Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Beijing Mkt Medicine Science And Technology Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Beijing Tongyizhong New Material Technology Corporation Supplier Evaluation
Beijing Tongyizhong New Material Technology Corporation Supplier Evaluation
Bazhou Aifeiya Home Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Bazhou Aifeiya Home Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Blog You May Like

Zhejiang Yongan Deli Industry And Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Yongan Deli Industry And Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Yumeng Packaging Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Yumeng Packaging Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Borui Eyeglasses Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Borui Eyeglasses Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Cixi Utrust Electric Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Cixi Utrust Electric Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Good Young Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Good Young Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo P&M Plastic Metal Product Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo P&M Plastic Metal Product Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Dong Yu Doors And Windows Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Dong Yu Doors And Windows Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Mastertop Home Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Mastertop Home Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
General Electronics Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
General Electronics Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Huizhou Yongli Industrial Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Huizhou Yongli Industrial Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Etek Electrical Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Etek Electrical Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Optfocus Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Optfocus Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Hugo Kitchenware Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Hugo Kitchenware Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Geshifeng Metal Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Geshifeng Metal Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ninghai County Bohong Crafts Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ninghai County Bohong Crafts Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Linyuanwai Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Linyuanwai Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Huaian Kinsery Weave Co.,Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Huaian Kinsery Weave Co.,Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Taixiong Magnetic Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Taixiong Magnetic Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jingjiang Asian-Pacific Special Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jingjiang Asian-Pacific Special Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Henan Meker Hvac Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Henan Meker Hvac Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Information

  • About Us

Store Info

Address:
4578 Marmora Road, Glasgow, D04 89GR
Phones:
800
We are open:

E-mail: kimibetters@gmail.com

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

Get all the latest information on Events, Sales and Offers. Sign up for newsletter today.

Powered By News Top © 2026