Guangzhou Jisheng Keyan International Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Supplier Evaluation Report

Supplier: Guangzhou Jisheng Keyan International Trade Co., Ltd.
Country/Region: Guangdong, China

Executive Summary

Guangzhou Jisheng Keyan International Trade Co., Ltd. appears to be a China-based skincare-related supplier with listed products including collagen blue copper peptide items, GHK-Cu copper peptide wrinkle products, peptide freeze-dried powder, soothing redness repair products, and skin care serum peptide freeze-dried products. The supplier reports a factory area of over 12,000㎡ and more than 40 staff, indicating a small-to-medium operational scale with a relatively sizable facility footprint. Platform credibility is supported by Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance availability, and verified supplier status, although the Gold Supplier history is short at 1 year. Business activity shows 100+ orders and CN¥47.3K+ transaction value in the past six months, supported by a 4.7 store rating and 10+ reviews. Delivery performance is strong, with a 100% on-time delivery rate. This supplier may be suitable for buyers seeking low-MOQ skincare peptide products and early-stage supplier engagement, while larger buyers should further verify quality systems, customization capability, and production consistency.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength — 20 Points

Basis

• Factory area: 12,000+㎡
• Staff size: 40+ staff
• Verified supplier / factory audit status: True
• Location: Guangdong, China

Elaboration

The supplier reports a factory area exceeding 12,000㎡, which suggests a meaningful physical operating base and potential capacity for organized production, storage, or processing activities. However, the employee count of 40+ staff indicates that the human resource scale is relatively modest compared with larger industrial manufacturers. The presence of verified supplier status strengthens the reliability of the company profile and provides a basic level of platform-backed credibility regarding the supplier’s existence and operating information.

Scoring Rationale

The company shows stronger facility scale than a typical small workshop due to the 12,000+㎡ reported area, and the verified supplier status supports basic operational credibility. However, the 40+ staff count limits the assessment from being categorized as a large-scale, highly stable supply chain. There is no additional data on production lines, monthly capacity, equipment, R&D team, or factory certifications beyond the verified supplier indication. Therefore, the supplier is best assessed as a medium-scale supplier with basic verified manufacturing or operating capability, rather than a large-scale mature manufacturer.

Final Score

15 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility — 20 Points

Basis

• Gold Supplier: True
• Gold Supplier history: 1 year
• Trade Assurance: True
• Verified supplier: True
• Platform labels: “On-time delivery 100.0%”, “Response time ≤2h”
• Other compliance certifications: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier has several important platform credibility indicators, including Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance support, and verified supplier status. These elements provide a basic level of buyer protection and platform-based verification. However, the Gold Supplier duration is only 1 year, which means the supplier has limited platform history. The available certification or industry labels mainly relate to delivery and response performance rather than product compliance, factory management systems, or industry-specific certifications.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier meets several core platform credibility requirements: Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance, and verification. These are positive indicators for initial procurement engagement. However, the short Gold Supplier history reduces long-term credibility, and there is no provided evidence of broader compliance certifications, product safety certifications, factory management certifications, or complete certification documentation. As a result, the supplier demonstrates acceptable platform credibility but does not yet qualify as a long-established, fully certified platform supplier.

Final Score

15 / 20

3. Business Performance — 20 Points

Basis

• Orders in past 6 months: 100+
• Transaction value in past 6 months: CN¥47.3K+
• Store rating: 4.7
• Number of reviews: 10+

Elaboration

The supplier has recorded more than 100 orders in the past six months, showing active commercial engagement on the platform. The transaction value of CN¥47.3K+ indicates real sales activity, although the monetary scale is not particularly high. The store rating of 4.7 is positive, suggesting generally satisfactory buyer feedback. However, the review count of 10+ is still relatively limited, meaning the customer feedback base is not yet broad enough to strongly validate long-term market acceptance or repeat purchasing behavior.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier demonstrates real business activity, with a meaningful number of recent orders and a good rating. However, the relatively modest transaction value and limited number of reviews suggest that commercial validation is still developing. The performance is stronger than a newly listed supplier with little transaction history, but it does not reach the level of a high-volume, highly validated supplier with large transaction value and extensive reviews. Therefore, the business performance is assessed as stable but moderate.

Final Score

14 / 20

4. Service Capability — 10 Points

Basis

• Communication response time: ≤2h
• Full Customization support: Insufficient Data
• Listed product types include OEM and private label wording, but explicit full customization capability is not confirmed

Elaboration

The supplier’s response time of within 2 hours is a positive service indicator and suggests reasonable communication efficiency. This is suitable for buyers requiring relatively fast inquiry handling and order discussion. Some listed products include terms such as “OEM” and “Private Label,” but the provided data does not explicitly confirm Full Customization support, design services, formulation customization, packaging customization, or development capability. Therefore, customization capability cannot be fully validated based on the available information.

Scoring Rationale

The response time is good but does not meet the strongest service benchmark of ≤1 hour. The lack of explicit Full Customization confirmation limits the service capability score. While the product listings suggest some OEM or private-label orientation, procurement evaluation must rely only on confirmed data, and the degree of customization remains unclear. The supplier therefore shows normal-to-good service responsiveness but insufficient evidence of advanced customization capability.

Final Score

7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance — 10 Points

Basis

• On-time delivery rate: 100.0%

Elaboration

The supplier’s reported on-time delivery rate is 100.0%, which is the strongest delivery performance indicator provided in the dataset. This suggests that, based on current platform data, the supplier has been able to meet shipping commitments effectively. For buyers, strong delivery reliability is especially important when sourcing low-MOQ or repeat-purchase skincare products, where timing and inventory replenishment can affect sales continuity.

Scoring Rationale

According to the scoring standard, an on-time delivery rate above 90% qualifies for 9–10 points. Since the supplier’s rate is reported at 100.0%, it meets the highest delivery performance band. No negative delivery data is provided. However, the score is based only on the supplied platform metric, and there is no additional information on average lead time, peak-season capacity, or logistics flexibility.

Final Score

10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback — 20 Points

Basis

• Store rating: 4.7
• Review count: 10+
• Verified supplier / factory audit status: True
• Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
• Product compliance or quality certifications: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The store rating of 4.7 indicates generally positive customer satisfaction. The supplier also has verified supplier status, which contributes to basic quality and credibility assurance at the company profile level. However, the review count of 10+ is relatively small, limiting the statistical strength of the customer feedback. More importantly, there is no provided data confirming Finished Product Inspection, third-party inspection procedures, quality control certifications, product testing reports, or industry-specific compliance documentation.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier receives a good quality-related score because the rating is positive and the company has verified supplier status. However, the quality assurance system cannot be considered comprehensive due to the absence of confirmed Finished Product Inspection and product certification data. The low review volume also limits confidence in long-term consistency. Therefore, the supplier fits the profile of a supplier with acceptable basic quality feedback, but additional due diligence is necessary before high-volume or compliance-sensitive procurement.

Final Score

14 / 20

Total Score

Procurement Recommendation

Recommendation: Conditional Cooperation Recommended

Guangzhou Jisheng Keyan International Trade Co., Ltd. is suitable for buyers seeking skincare peptide-related products with low MOQ options, moderate platform credibility, and strong reported delivery performance. The supplier may be appropriate for small to medium-sized buyers, trial orders, e-commerce sellers, private-label exploration, and buyers who prioritize quick response and Trade Assurance protection.

However, cooperation should begin with controlled trial orders rather than immediate large-scale purchasing. Key risks include limited Gold Supplier history, modest transaction value, relatively low review count, and insufficient data on Finished Product Inspection, product compliance certifications, full customization capability, and detailed quality control systems.

The supplier shows growth potential due to its 12,000+㎡ reported factory area, verified supplier status, 100+ recent orders, 4.7 rating, and 100% on-time delivery rate. For larger or compliance-sensitive procurement, buyers should request additional documentation, including quality inspection procedures, product test reports, customization scope, production capacity details, and relevant certification evidence before committing to volume orders.