zemez1039

Phones: 800
    • Shopping Cart
    • Checkout
News Top
  • Company Center
  • Featured Companies
  • Newest Companies
  • Recommended Companies

Hangzhou Sfr Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

12.07.26 0 Comments Posted by

Executive Summary

Hangzhou Sfr Technology Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Zhejiang, positioned as an industrial chain manufacturer or supplier with listed products including hollow pin chains, sugar mill conveyor chains, industrial steel chains, roller chains, and heavy-duty stainless steel chains. The company shows strong production-side indicators, with a reported factory area of over 80,000 sqm, more than 590 staff, and verified supplier status. Its platform credibility is supported by 5 years as a Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance, and service/quality-related tags such as Finished Product Inspection, ODM service, Full Customization, and Minor Customization. Commercial activity appears moderate, with 20+ orders and CN¥338K+ transaction value over the past six months. However, customer feedback depth is limited, as only one review is provided despite a 5.0 store rating. This supplier appears suitable for buyers seeking industrial chain products with customization capability and medium-scale transaction validation, while buyers requiring extensive review history or detailed third-party factory certifications should conduct additional verification.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis:
The supplier reports a factory area of 80,000+ sqm, 590+ staff, and verified supplier status. The company is located in Zhejiang, China.

Elaboration:
The reported factory size and employee base indicate a large operating footprint compared with small or basic trading entities. A facility exceeding 80,000 sqm and a workforce above 590 staff suggest the supplier may be capable of supporting industrial-scale production, order handling, and operational continuity. The verified supplier status adds a basic level of factory or supplier credibility, although the provided data does not include specific factory audit reports, production line details, equipment lists, or named factory certifications.

Scoring Rationale:
The company meets the profile of a large-scale supplier based on facility size and employee count. The score is kept slightly below full marks because detailed factory audit documentation, production capacity figures, and specific factory certification names are not provided. Therefore, the production scale appears strong, but some operational verification remains insufficient.

Final Score: 19 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis:
The supplier is listed as an Gold Supplier for 5 years, supports Trade Assurance, and has tags including Finished Product Inspection, ODM service available, Full Customization, and Minor Customization. Verified supplier status is also provided.

Elaboration:
A 5-year Gold Supplier record indicates an established presence on rather than a newly registered storefront. Trade Assurance provides an additional transaction protection mechanism for buyers using the platform. The presence of service and inspection-related tags improves platform credibility, especially Finished Product Inspection and customization-related labels. However, the data does not provide external compliance certificates, industry-specific certifications, or details of the verification scope.

Scoring Rationale:
The supplier has a relatively complete platform credibility profile: Gold Supplier status, a 5-year platform history, Trade Assurance, and verified supplier status. These are meaningful trust indicators for -based procurement. The score is not higher because the data does not confirm internationally recognized certifications, detailed audit results, or complete compliance documentation.

Final Score: 18 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis:
Past six-month order volume is 20+, transaction value is CN¥338K+, store rating is 5.0, and review count is 1.

Elaboration:
The supplier has demonstrated recent transaction activity, with more than 20 orders and over CN¥338K in transaction value during the past six months. This indicates that the store is commercially active and has some level of market validation. The 5.0 rating is positive, but the reliability of this rating is limited because it is supported by only one review. The available data does not include repeat buyer rate, buyer geography, order size distribution, or long-term transaction trend.

Scoring Rationale:
The supplier shows moderate business performance: transaction value and order count are present but not high enough to indicate very strong platform sales momentum. The limited review count reduces confidence in the store rating as a broad customer satisfaction indicator. Overall, the supplier fits a stable but not highly proven commercial profile.

Final Score: 15 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis:
Communication response time is listed as ≤5h. Platform tags include Full Customization, Minor Customization, and ODM service available.

Elaboration:
The supplier demonstrates customization capability through Full Customization, Minor Customization, and ODM service tags. This is relevant for buyers requiring industrial chain products with specification adjustments or product adaptation. The response time of ≤5 hours is acceptable for normal supplier communication, though it is not within the strongest response benchmark of ≤1 hour. No additional data is provided on quotation speed, technical support, engineering assistance, or after-sales service.

Scoring Rationale:
The supplier has clear customization capability, which supports service flexibility. However, the response time is moderate rather than highly responsive, and there is insufficient data on technical communication quality or after-sales handling. The score reflects solid but not top-tier service capability.

Final Score: 7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis:
On-time delivery rate is 85.7%.

Elaboration:
An 85.7% on-time delivery rate falls within the 80%-89% range. This suggests the supplier has a generally acceptable delivery record, but there is still measurable risk of delayed shipments. For industrial chain procurement, where project schedules and equipment maintenance timelines can be sensitive, buyers should confirm lead times, production schedules, and delivery commitments before placing larger orders.

Scoring Rationale:
Based strictly on the provided scoring standard, an 85.7% on-time shipment rate corresponds to the 7-8 point range. The supplier is above the minimum acceptable range but below the 90%+ level associated with stronger delivery reliability.

Final Score: 8 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis:
Store rating is 5.0, review count is 1, and the supplier has Finished Product Inspection and verified supplier status.

Elaboration:
The 5.0 store rating is favorable, and Finished Product Inspection suggests that some form of final quality check is available before shipment. Verified supplier status also supports baseline credibility. However, only one review is provided, which is not enough to establish broad customer satisfaction or consistent quality performance across multiple transactions. The data does not include defect rates, inspection reports, product testing standards, warranty terms, or third-party quality certifications.

Scoring Rationale:
The supplier has positive quality-related indicators, especially Finished Product Inspection and a perfect store rating. However, the very low review count significantly limits the reliability of the customer feedback signal. The score reflects good basic quality assurance visibility but insufficient customer feedback depth.

Final Score: 15 / 20

Total Score

82 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Cooperation is recommended with controlled verification. Hangzhou Sfr Technology Co., Ltd. appears suitable for buyers seeking industrial chains, roller chains, conveyor chains, and related customized chain products from a large-scale China-based supplier with platform credibility and moderate recent transaction activity.

Best-fit customer types include: - Buyers requiring industrial chain products with customization options. - Importers or distributors seeking a verified supplier with Trade Assurance. - Medium-volume buyers who can validate specifications through samples or trial orders before scaling.

Main risk points: - Customer feedback is limited, with only 1 review available. - On-time delivery rate is 85.7%, which is acceptable but not excellent. - Specific factory certifications, third-party audit details, and product testing documentation are Insufficient Data. - Long-term quality consistency cannot be fully assessed from the provided review count.

Growth potential is positive due to the supplier’s large reported factory area, sizable workforce, 5-year Gold Supplier history, customization capability, and recent transaction activity. For larger procurement programs, buyers should request inspection reports, production capacity details, certification documents, and sample validation before committing to bulk orders.

  • Comments

Comments

Leave your comment
Cancel reply

Note: HTML is not translated!

Submit comment

Most popular Blog

Hangzhou Bison Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Bison Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Grin (Hangzhou) Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Grin (Hangzhou) Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Jiuzhong Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Jiuzhong Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Benhao Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Benhao Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Langbin Technology (Hangzhou ) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Langbin Technology (Hangzhou ) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Ingscreen Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Ingscreen Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Heyshow Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Heyshow Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Hengxianlong Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Hengxianlong Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Lantu Technology Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Lantu Technology Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Shinepoch Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Shinepoch Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Mindong Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Mindong Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Chengxi Network Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Chengxi Network Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Jingfei Instrument Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Jingfei Instrument Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Clean Pco Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Clean Pco Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Danno Machinery Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Danno Machinery Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Hengtuo Machinery Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Hengtuo Machinery Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Health Shining Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Health Shining Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Tg Cup Industry Technology (Hangzhou) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Tg Cup Industry Technology (Hangzhou) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Top Mechanical And Electrical Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Top Mechanical And Electrical Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Taizhou Yantchau Agricultural Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Taizhou Yantchau Agricultural Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Blog You May Like

Nantong Wanli Medical Instrument Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Nantong Wanli Medical Instrument Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Changhua Star Vehicle Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Changhua Star Vehicle Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xuzhou Caixin Aluminum Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xuzhou Caixin Aluminum Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xiamen Huaxuan Gelatin Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xiamen Huaxuan Gelatin Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Jindijia Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Jindijia Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Meiji Medical Technology (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Meiji Medical Technology (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Gt Accessories Co.,Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Gt Accessories Co.,Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Lechang Xin Dongsui Auto Accessories Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Lechang Xin Dongsui Auto Accessories Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Force  Auto Parts Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Force Auto Parts Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Ordos Zhongchengyu Energy Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ordos Zhongchengyu Energy Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhengzhou Zonghoo Biotech Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhengzhou Zonghoo Biotech Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foodmate Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foodmate Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Suntung Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Suntung Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhongshan Yihua Lighting Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhongshan Yihua Lighting Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jurong Boyue Apparel Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jurong Boyue Apparel Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Ider New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Ider New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Chang Zhou Ncyclebike Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Chang Zhou Ncyclebike Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Jilong Imp. & Exp. Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Jilong Imp. & Exp. Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Safely Lift Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Safely Lift Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Dongteng Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Dongteng Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Information

  • About Us

Store Info

Address:
4578 Marmora Road, Glasgow, D04 89GR
Phones:
800
We are open:

E-mail: kimibetters@gmail.com

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

Get all the latest information on Events, Sales and Offers. Sign up for newsletter today.

Powered By News Top © 2026