Heze Jiaqi Pest Control Agricultural Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Executive Summary

Heze Jiaqi Pest Control Agricultural Technology Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Shandong, offering pest-control adhesive trap products such as mosquito and fly trap items. Based on the provided data, the company operates with a reported factory area of 2,500+ m² and 10+ staff, indicating a small-scale production setup with basic manufacturing capacity. The supplier has Gold Supplier status for 1 year, supports Trade Assurance, and is marked as a verified supplier, which provides a moderate level of platform credibility despite the short supplier history. Commercially, the company shows some transaction activity with 10+ orders and CN¥405.6K+ transaction value over the past six months, but the absence of store rating and zero reviews limit buyer-side validation. The supplier appears most suitable for buyers seeking low-MOQ adhesive pest-control products with fast response and platform-backed trade protection, while larger buyers should conduct additional quality and capacity verification before placing significant orders.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis
- Factory location: Shandong, China
- Factory area: 2,500+ m²
- Employees: 10+ staff
- Verified supplier: True

Elaboration
The supplier has a declared factory footprint of over 2,500 m², which suggests the presence of a physical production or operating site rather than a purely trading profile. However, the reported staffing level of 10+ employees indicates a relatively lean organization. This combination points to a small production-oriented supplier with basic operational infrastructure, but not enough evidence to classify it as a large-scale or deeply resourced manufacturer.

Scoring Rationale
The verified supplier status supports baseline credibility, and the factory area is meaningful for a niche adhesive pest-control product supplier. However, the limited employee count restricts the assessment of production depth, labor capacity, and scalability. Since the company shows basic production capability but does not demonstrate large workforce scale or broader factory certification details beyond verification, it fits the “small but with basic production capacity” band.

Final Score: 12 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier duration: 1 year
- Trade Assurance: True
- Verified supplier: True
- Certification / industry tags: Warranty available, Finished product inspection, ODM service available, Response time ≤1h

Elaboration
The supplier has several important platform credibility indicators, including Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance support, and verified supplier status. These features reduce procurement risk by offering platform-backed transaction mechanisms and a basic level of supplier authentication. The available tags also indicate some commercial and operational service capabilities, particularly finished product inspection and warranty availability.

Scoring Rationale
The key credibility framework is present, but the Gold Supplier history is only 1 year, limiting the strength of long-term platform reliability. The supplier has relevant platform labels, but there is no additional data on third-party management system certifications or detailed factory audit results. Therefore, the supplier is stronger than a basic unverified profile but cannot be rated as a long-established, fully mature platform supplier.

Final Score: 15 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis
- Orders in past 6 months: 10+
- Transaction value in past 6 months: CN¥405.6K+
- Store rating: Insufficient Data
- Review count: 0

Elaboration
The company has recorded transaction activity over the past six months, with more than 10 orders and transaction value exceeding CN¥405.6K. This indicates that the supplier has achieved some commercial traction on the platform. However, the order count remains limited, and the lack of store rating combined with zero reviews makes it difficult to validate buyer satisfaction, repeat purchasing, or consistency of delivery experience from customer feedback.

Scoring Rationale
The transaction value is relatively notable compared with the low order count, suggesting some orders may be of meaningful size. Nevertheless, the limited number of orders and absence of review-based validation constrain the confidence level. The supplier demonstrates commercial activity but not yet a high-volume or strongly proven sales track record.

Final Score: 12 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis
- Communication response time: ≤1h
- ODM service available: Listed in certification / industry tags
- Full Customization: Insufficient Data

Elaboration
The supplier shows strong responsiveness, with a reported response time of one hour or less. ODM service availability suggests the supplier may support some degree of product development or adaptation, although the provided data does not confirm full customization capability. The product list also shows multiple adhesive pest-control products with varying MOQs, which may support flexible sourcing at the product-selection level.

Scoring Rationale
The fast response time is a strong service indicator and aligns with efficient pre-sales communication. However, because Full Customization is not explicitly confirmed, the score should not reach the highest tier. ODM availability supports a positive service assessment, but the lack of complete customization data keeps the evaluation in the upper-middle range rather than full marks.

Final Score: 8 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis
- On-time delivery rate: 100.0%

Elaboration
The supplier reports a 100.0% on-time delivery rate, which is a strong indicator of delivery reliability based on the provided platform data. This suggests that recorded shipments have been completed within the expected delivery schedule.

Scoring Rationale
According to the scoring criteria, an on-time delivery rate above 90% qualifies for the 9–10 point range. Since the reported rate is 100.0%, the supplier deserves a top-tier delivery score. However, the limited order volume should be considered when interpreting the robustness of this figure, although it does not directly reduce the delivery score under the given rule.

Final Score: 10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis
- Store rating: Insufficient Data
- Review count: 0
- Finished product inspection: Listed
- Factory Verification / Verified supplier: True

Elaboration
The supplier has some quality assurance indicators, including finished product inspection and verified supplier status. These elements suggest that at least basic quality control and platform verification mechanisms are present. However, there is no available store rating, and the review count is zero, which means customer satisfaction and post-transaction quality feedback cannot be validated from buyer evaluations.

Scoring Rationale
Finished product inspection is a positive quality control signal, and verified supplier status adds baseline confidence. However, the absence of reviews and store rating creates a major limitation in assessing real customer experience, defect consistency, and after-sales reliability. The supplier should therefore be rated as having basic quality assurance indicators but insufficient customer feedback validation.

Final Score: 12 / 20

Total Score

69 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Cooperation is conditionally recommended for small to mid-sized buyers seeking adhesive mosquito or fly trap products, especially when low MOQ, fast supplier response, and Trade Assurance are important. The supplier is suitable for trial orders, price-sensitive procurement, or early-stage sourcing validation.

Key risks include limited staffing scale, short Gold Supplier history, no available store rating, and zero customer reviews. These factors reduce confidence in long-term quality consistency and large-volume fulfillment capability. Before placing larger orders, buyers should request product samples, confirm inspection standards, clarify warranty terms, and verify actual production capacity. The supplier shows growth potential due to verified status, fast response, finished product inspection, and recorded transaction value, but still requires stronger customer feedback and longer platform performance history to qualify as a highly proven supplier.