Jiangxi Yuhao Science & Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Executive Summary

Jiangxi Yuhao Science & Technology Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Jiangxi with a reported factory area of 39,000+ sqm and 30+ staff. The supplier shows strong platform credibility, including 12 years as an Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance support, verified supplier status, and platform labels such as ODM service available, Full Customization, response time ≤1h, and 100.0% on-time delivery. Its operational profile suggests a supplier with established platform presence and responsive service capability, but its business validation is limited by relatively low recent order volume, only 9 orders in the past six months, a transaction value of CN¥270.4K+, a store rating of 3.8, and only 3 reviews. Based on the available data, this supplier may be suitable for buyers seeking responsive communication, low MOQ purchasing, customization support, and suppliers with long-term presence. However, quality confidence and market validation require caution due to limited review volume and insufficient data on finished product inspection.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis
- Factory area: 39,000+ sqm
- Employees: 30+ staff
- Verified supplier: True
- Factory location: Jiangxi, China

Elaboration
The supplier reports a relatively large factory area of over 39,000 sqm, which indicates physical production space and potential capacity for manufacturing or assembly operations. However, the reported workforce of 30+ staff is comparatively modest relative to the factory size. This creates a mixed company-strength profile: the site scale appears substantial, but the available staffing data does not clearly support classification as a large-scale labor-intensive manufacturing operation.

The supplier is marked as a verified supplier, which adds credibility to the basic company profile. However, no specific factory audit report, production line count, annual capacity, machinery details, or internationally recognized factory certification is provided in the dataset.

Scoring Rationale
The company has meaningful physical infrastructure and verified supplier status, but the limited employee count and lack of detailed production capacity data prevent it from being scored as a large-scale stable supply chain. It fits best as a medium-capability supplier with some verified operational foundation, rather than a fully evidenced large manufacturer.

Final Score
15 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier duration: 12 yrs
- Trade Assurance: True
- Verified supplier: True
- Certification / industry labels: ODM service available, Full customization, Response time ≤1h, On-time delivery 100.0%

Elaboration
The supplier has a strong platform history, with 12 years as a Gold Supplier. This is a significant platform credibility indicator because it reflects long-term marketplace participation. Trade Assurance support also improves buyer protection and transaction confidence.

The presence of platform labels such as ODM service available, Full customization, fast response time, and 100.0% on-time delivery further supports its platform profile. However, the available data does not include independent third-party product certifications, compliance certificates, or detailed factory audit documentation beyond verified supplier status.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier demonstrates a mature and credible profile, supported by long Gold Supplier tenure, Trade Assurance, verified supplier status, and multiple service/performance labels. The score is high, though not perfect, because certification details beyond platform labels are not provided.

Final Score
19 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis
- Orders in past 6 months: 9
- Transaction value in past 6 months: CN¥270.4K+
- Store rating: 3.8
- Number of reviews: 3

Elaboration
The supplier has recorded commercial activity in the past six months, with 9 orders and CN¥270.4K+ in transaction value. This indicates that the supplier is active and has completed recent transactions. However, the order count is relatively low, and the review base is very limited.

The store rating of 3.8 is not high, especially when combined with only 3 reviews. With such a small review sample, the rating does not provide strong statistical confidence. The transaction value is meaningful, but the low order count suggests that recent business performance is not strongly validated by broad buyer activity.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier has some commercial proof through recent orders and transaction value, but the limited number of orders, low review count, and moderate store rating restrict confidence. This dimension should be viewed as commercially active but not strongly proven at scale.

Final Score
11 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis
- Communication response time: ≤1h
- Platform labels: Full customization, ODM service available

Elaboration
The supplier shows strong service indicators based on the provided platform data. A response time of ≤1h suggests high communication responsiveness, which is important for quotation clarification, customization discussions, order follow-up, and issue resolution.

The supplier also carries Full Customization and ODM service available labels. These indicate that the supplier may support customized product requirements and design-related cooperation. However, the dataset does not provide details on customization scope, sample lead time, design team size, or engineering capability.

Scoring Rationale
Based strictly on the available data, the supplier meets the highest service-capability criteria: response time is ≤1h and Full Customization is supported. Some technical customization details remain unavailable, but the platform indicators are strong enough to justify a high score.

Final Score
10 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis
- On-time delivery rate: 100.0%

Elaboration
The supplier reports a 100.0% on-time delivery rate. Under the scoring framework, an on-time delivery rate above 90% qualifies for the highest score range. This is a strong logistics and fulfillment indicator.

However, the dataset does not provide the number of shipments behind this rate, the measurement period, destination markets, or average lead times. Therefore, while the reported delivery metric is excellent, its depth of validation is limited by the absence of supporting shipment details.

Scoring Rationale
The available on-time delivery rate is 100.0%, which fully satisfies the top scoring range for delivery performance. No negative delivery data is provided.

Final Score
10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis
- Store rating: 3.8
- Number of reviews: 3
- Verified supplier: True
- Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
- Factory Verification: Supplier marked as verified; detailed factory verification documentation is not provided

Elaboration
Quality and customer feedback data is limited. The supplier has a store rating of 3.8, but this is based on only 3 reviews, which is too small to provide strong buyer-feedback confidence. The rating is also moderate rather than strong.

The supplier is marked as verified, which provides some baseline credibility. However, the dataset does not confirm whether Finished Product Inspection is available. It also does not provide inspection reports, defect rates, return records, quality certifications, product test reports, or detailed buyer feedback content.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier has some quality-related credibility through verified supplier status, but customer feedback is weak due to the low review count and moderate rating. Because Finished Product Inspection information is not available, the quality assurance system cannot be considered fully proven.

Final Score
12 / 20

Total Score

77 / 100

• Company Strength: 15 / 20
• Platform & Compliance Credibility: 19 / 20
• Business Performance: 11 / 20
• Service Capability: 10 / 10
• Delivery Performance: 10 / 10
• Quality & Customer Feedback: 12 / 20

Procurement Recommendation

Cooperation is conditionally recommended.

Jiangxi Yuhao Science & Technology Co., Ltd. appears suitable for buyers who prioritize fast communication, Trade Assurance protection, long-term platform presence, low MOQ sourcing, and suppliers that advertise customization or ODM capability. The supplier may be appropriate for trial orders, customized sample development, or small-to-medium procurement projects where buyers can verify quality before scaling volume.

Key risks include limited recent order volume, only 3 reviews, a moderate store rating of 3.8, and insufficient data on Finished Product Inspection or detailed quality certifications. These factors reduce confidence in large-volume procurement without additional verification.

Recommended procurement approach: start with a sample order or small trial batch, request product inspection evidence, confirm customization scope in writing, and use Trade Assurance for initial transactions. Growth potential exists due to the supplier’s large reported factory area, 12-year Gold Supplier history, fast response time, and 100.0% on-time delivery record, but larger cooperation should depend on verified product quality and successful trial performance.