Jieyang Wanyeda Stainless Steel Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Executive Summary

Jieyang Wanyeda Stainless Steel Industrial Co., Ltd. is a China-based stainless steel drinkware supplier located in Guangdong, with a reported factory area of 13,000+㎡ and 180+ staff. The supplier presents a relatively solid manufacturing profile, supported by factory verification, 14 years as an Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance, Finished Product Inspection, and a reported 100.0% on-time delivery rate. Its product data shows stainless steel vacuum flasks, travel bottles, children’s cartoon stainless products, and related drinkware items with low MOQ levels of 1–2 pieces, which may suit sample testing, small-batch sourcing, and flexible procurement needs. However, business performance data is limited: only 10+ orders and CN¥6K+ transaction value in the past six months are provided, while store rating is missing and review count is 0. Overall, this supplier appears more suitable for buyers prioritizing verified production capacity and platform credibility, while buyers relying heavily on public customer feedback should proceed with additional due diligence.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis:
- Factory area: 13,000+㎡
- Employees: 180+ staff
- Verified supplier/factory status: True
- Location: Guangdong, China

Elaboration:
The supplier has a measurable physical production base and a workforce size that indicates established manufacturing capability. A 13,000+㎡ factory and 180+ employees suggest capacity beyond a very small workshop. The verified supplier/factory status further strengthens the credibility of the production profile.

Scoring Rationale:
The company demonstrates a stable mid-sized manufacturing foundation with verified operational presence. However, the data does not include detailed production lines, monthly output, machinery list, or capacity utilization, so it cannot be classified as a large-scale supply chain with full confidence.

Final Score: 17 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis:
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier duration: 14 years
- Trade Assurance: True
- Certification/industry labels: OEM for well-known brands, Finished Product Inspection, Response time ≤3h, On-time delivery 100.0%

Elaboration:
The supplier has long-term platform presence, Trade Assurance support, and multiple platform-visible credibility labels. The 14-year Gold Supplier history is a strong indicator of platform continuity. Finished Product Inspection and on-time delivery tags also contribute to compliance and operational credibility.

Scoring Rationale:
This is one of the supplier’s strongest areas. The combination of long Gold Supplier tenure, Trade Assurance, factory verification, and platform labels provides a strong credibility framework. The score is not a full 20 because detailed third-party certification documents or specific factory audit reports are not provided.

Final Score: 19 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis:
- Orders in past six months: 10+
- Transaction value in past six months: CN¥6K+
- Store rating: Insufficient Data
- Review count: 0

Elaboration:
The supplier has recorded recent transactions, but the order volume and transaction value remain relatively low based on the provided data. The absence of a store rating and zero customer reviews limit the ability to assess market acceptance, repeat buyer confidence, or post-purchase satisfaction.

Scoring Rationale:
Although the supplier has some recent commercial activity, the available data does not show high transaction volume or strong customer validation. Missing rating data and 0 reviews significantly reduce confidence in business performance assessment.

Final Score: 10 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis:
- Communication response time: ≤3h
- Full Customization support: Insufficient Data

Elaboration:
A response time within three hours indicates acceptable communication efficiency for routine inquiry handling. However, there is no explicit data confirming Full Customization capability, design support, packaging customization, private labeling, or engineering assistance.

Scoring Rationale:
The supplier shows reasonable responsiveness, but the absence of confirmed Full Customization data prevents a higher score. Service capability appears functional but not fully proven as a strong customization-oriented service model.

Final Score: 7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis:
- On-time delivery rate: 100.0%

Elaboration:
The reported on-time delivery rate is excellent and directly supports procurement reliability. A 100.0% delivery performance metric suggests that, based on the available platform data, the supplier has been able to meet shipment timing commitments.

Scoring Rationale:
According to the scoring standard, an on-time delivery rate above 90% qualifies for 9–10 points. Since the provided rate is 100.0%, the supplier receives the maximum score in this category.

Final Score: 10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis:
- Store rating: Insufficient Data
- Review count: 0
- Finished Product Inspection: Present
- Factory Verification: True

Elaboration:
The supplier has basic quality assurance indicators, including Finished Product Inspection and verified factory status. These are positive signs for quality control structure. However, there is no store rating and no customer reviews, which means customer-side quality feedback cannot be validated from the provided data.

Scoring Rationale:
The supplier benefits from inspection and verification signals, but the lack of public customer feedback is a major limitation. The quality system appears partially supported, while buyer satisfaction and product consistency remain insufficiently evidenced.

Final Score: 12 / 20

Total Score

75 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Cooperation is conditionally recommended. This supplier is suitable for buyers seeking stainless steel drinkware with low MOQ flexibility, verified factory background, Trade Assurance support, and strong delivery performance. It may be appropriate for sample orders, small-batch procurement, and buyers prioritizing platform credibility over public review history.

Key risks include limited recent transaction scale, missing store rating, 0 reviews, and insufficient data on Full Customization capability. Growth potential exists due to the supplier’s factory scale, 14-year Gold Supplier history, verified status, Finished Product Inspection, and 100.0% on-time delivery record. For larger-volume sourcing, buyers should request product samples, inspection reports, customization capability details, and recent order references before committing.