Jinhua Dayongchuang Plastic Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Executive Summary
Jinhua Dayongchuang Plastic Products Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Zhejiang, offering portable and foldable laundry washing board products at low unit price ranges and relatively low MOQ levels. The company shows a verified supplier status, a factory area of 3,600+㎡, and 10+ staff, indicating a small-scale but operational manufacturing setup. On , the supplier has 7 years of Gold Supplier history, supports Trade Assurance, and displays key platform indicators including response time within 5 hours and on-time delivery of 95.2%. Business performance is moderate, with 100+ orders and CN¥135.2K+ transaction value over the past six months, supported by a 4.8 store rating and 20+ reviews. This supplier appears suitable for small to medium buyers, trial orders, low-MOQ procurement, and buyers seeking cost-sensitive portable laundry accessory products. However, limited employee scale, modest review volume, and insufficient data on customization and finished product inspection should be considered before larger-volume sourcing.

Detailed Analysis
1. Company Strength
Basis
- Factory area: 3,600+㎡
- Employees: 10+ staff
- Verified supplier: True
- Country/region: Zhejiang, China
Elaboration
The supplier has a physical factory footprint of over 3,600㎡, which indicates an established production site rather than a purely trading-based operation. However, the reported employee count of 10+ staff suggests a relatively small workforce. The verified supplier status improves confidence in the company’s basic operational legitimacy, but the available data does not indicate large-scale production capacity, advanced manufacturing lines, or additional factory certifications.
Scoring Rationale
The company demonstrates basic manufacturing capability and verified supplier status, but its small staff size limits the assessment of scalability. The factory area is reasonable for a small to mid-sized operation, yet there is insufficient evidence to classify it as a large-scale stable supply chain. Therefore, the supplier fits best into the category of a small factory with basic production capability.
Final Score
12 / 20
2. Platform & Compliance Credibility
Basis
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier duration: 7 years
- Trade Assurance: True
- Certification/industry tags: “Response time ≤5h”, “On-time delivery 95.2%”
- Verified supplier: True
Elaboration
The supplier has maintained Gold Supplier status for 7 years, which reflects a relatively established presence on the platform. Trade Assurance support adds transaction protection for buyers, while verified supplier status provides an additional credibility layer. The available platform tags are operational indicators rather than formal product or management certifications, so the compliance profile is credible but not fully comprehensive.
Scoring Rationale
A 7-year Gold Supplier record, Trade Assurance availability, and verified supplier status represent a solid platform credibility foundation. However, the provided data does not include detailed third-party factory audit reports, product compliance certifications, or management system certifications. This supports a strong but not top-tier platform and compliance score.
Final Score
17 / 20
3. Business Performance
Basis
- Orders in past 6 months: 100+
- Transaction value in past 6 months: CN¥135.2K+
- Store rating: 4.8
- Reviews: 20+
Elaboration
The supplier has generated more than 100 orders over the last six months, showing active marketplace demand. The transaction value of CN¥135.2K+ indicates moderate commercial activity rather than large-scale export volume. A 4.8 store rating is positive, while 20+ reviews provide some customer feedback but remain limited in volume.
Scoring Rationale
The supplier shows verified commercial activity with acceptable order count and a good store rating. However, the transaction value and review base are not high enough to support a top-tier business performance assessment. The data suggests stable but moderate market validation.
Final Score
15 / 20
4. Service Capability
Basis
- Response time: ≤5h
- Full Customization: Insufficient Data
- Communication efficiency: Based only on response time indicator
Elaboration
The supplier’s listed response time of within 5 hours indicates acceptable communication responsiveness, though it does not meet the strongest benchmark of response within one hour. There is no provided evidence confirming Full Customization capability, design support, private labeling, packaging customization, or engineering assistance.
Scoring Rationale
The response speed is reasonable for regular sourcing communication, but the absence of customization data limits the service capability score. Since strong customization capability cannot be verified, the supplier should be evaluated as having basic service responsiveness only.
Final Score
7 / 10
5. Delivery Performance
Basis
- On-time delivery rate: 95.2%
Elaboration
The supplier’s on-time delivery rate of 95.2% is a strong logistics performance indicator. It exceeds the 90% benchmark used for the highest score range in this category. This suggests reliable fulfillment performance based on the provided platform data.
Scoring Rationale
With an on-time delivery rate above 90%, the supplier qualifies for the highest delivery performance band. The score is not set at the absolute maximum because no additional delivery data is provided, such as average lead time, delay history, shipment volume, or destination market performance.
Final Score
9 / 10
6. Quality & Customer Feedback
Basis
- Store rating: 4.8
- Reviews: 20+
- Verified supplier: True
- Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
- Factory Verification: Verified supplier status provided, but detailed factory verification scope is Insufficient Data
Elaboration
The supplier has a strong store rating of 4.8, indicating generally positive customer satisfaction. However, the review count of 20+ is relatively limited, meaning the feedback base is not large enough to fully validate consistent quality performance across many buyers or order cycles. The verified supplier status supports basic trust, but there is no direct evidence of Finished Product Inspection or a detailed quality control system.
Scoring Rationale
The rating is favorable, but the limited review volume and missing finished product inspection data prevent a high score. Quality confidence is moderate: positive customer feedback exists, but the quality assurance system is not sufficiently documented in the provided data.
Final Score
14 / 20
Total Score
74 / 100
Procurement Recommendation
Cooperation is recommended with caution for small to medium-volume buyers, trial orders, low-MOQ sourcing, and cost-sensitive portable laundry washing board products. The supplier has solid platform credibility, good delivery performance, and moderate recent transaction activity. Key risks include small reported staff size, limited review volume, insufficient data on Full Customization, and insufficient data on Finished Product Inspection. Growth potential exists if the supplier can provide stronger evidence of quality control, customization capability, production capacity, and factory audit documentation.
Leave your comment