Ningbo Glantu Electronic Industry And Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Executive Summary
Ningbo Glantu Electronic Industry And Trade Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Zhejiang, with a reported factory area of 2,000+㎡ and 40+ staff. Based on the provided data, the company appears to operate as a small-to-medium production supplier focused on mosquito repellent-related products, including EVA mosquito repellent items, repellent pouches, bracelets, and essential-oil-based mosquito repellent products. The supplier has strong platform credibility, supported by 11 years as an Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance availability, and verified supplier status. Business activity is relatively solid, with 300+ orders and CN¥3.3M+ transaction value over the past six months. However, the store rating of 4.5 and 30+ reviews indicate moderate customer feedback depth rather than extensive market validation. This supplier is suitable for buyers seeking low-MOQ mosquito repellent products, basic customization, and platform-backed sourcing, while buyers requiring advanced quality documentation should request additional inspection and compliance evidence.

Detailed Analysis
1. Company Strength
Basis
- Factory location: Zhejiang, China
- Factory area: 2,000+㎡
- Employee count: 40+ staff
- Verified supplier: True
Elaboration
The supplier has a visible manufacturing footprint with a reported production space exceeding 2,000㎡ and more than 40 employees. This indicates a functioning production operation rather than a purely trading-oriented profile based on the available data. The verified supplier status adds some credibility to the company’s operational presence, although no detailed factory audit report, equipment list, production line count, or annual capacity data is provided.
Scoring Rationale
The company demonstrates basic-to-moderate production capability, supported by factory size, staff count, and verified supplier status. However, the scale is not large enough to be classified as a major industrial supplier, and the absence of detailed capacity data limits confidence in high-volume supply stability. Therefore, the score fits the upper range of a small factory with established operating capability.
Final Score
13 / 20
2. Platform & Compliance Credibility
Basis
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier duration: 11 years
- Trade Assurance: True
- Certification / industry labels: Warranty available, Full customization, ODM service available, Response time ≤3h
- Verified supplier: True
Elaboration
The supplier has a strong platform history, with 11 years as a Gold Supplier and support for Trade Assurance. These are meaningful indicators of platform continuity and transaction protection. The presence of verified supplier status further strengthens credibility. The listed tags also show service-related capabilities, including customization and ODM availability. However, no specific third-party product certifications or regulatory compliance documents are provided in the supplied data.
Scoring Rationale
The long Gold Supplier history, Trade Assurance support, and verified supplier status provide strong platform-level credibility. The main limitation is that the available certification labels are more service-oriented than compliance-oriented, and no product safety, factory audit, or industry certification details are included. Overall, this supplier has a solid platform trust profile, though not a fully documented compliance package.
Final Score
18 / 20
3. Business Performance
Basis
- Orders in past six months: 300+
- Transaction value in past six months: CN¥3.3M+
- Store rating: 4.5
- Number of reviews: 30+
Elaboration
The supplier shows active recent commercial performance, with more than 300 orders and transaction value above CN¥3.3M in the past six months. This indicates that the store is not inactive and has meaningful transaction volume. The 4.5 store rating is acceptable, while 30+ reviews provide some customer feedback but are not extensive enough to represent broad market validation.
Scoring Rationale
The order volume and transaction amount are relatively strong for recent six-month activity. However, the store rating is good rather than excellent, and the review count remains moderate. This supports a stable business-performance score, but not the highest tier reserved for suppliers with both high transaction volume and a large base of strong customer reviews.
Final Score
17 / 20
4. Service Capability
Basis
- Communication response time: ≤3h
- Full customization: Available
- ODM service: Available
Elaboration
The supplier provides a documented response time of within three hours, which suggests acceptable communication efficiency for sourcing discussions. The availability of full customization and ODM service indicates that the supplier can support more than standard off-the-shelf product purchasing. However, the data does not show response time within one hour, dedicated account support, sampling speed, or detailed customization workflow.
Scoring Rationale
The supplier meets the requirements for normal responsiveness and has customization capability. Since the response time is ≤3h rather than ≤1h, it does not qualify for the highest service tier. The combination of full customization and ODM support justifies a strong but not maximum score.
Final Score
8 / 10
5. Delivery Performance
Basis
- On-time delivery rate: 89.7%
Elaboration
The supplier’s on-time delivery rate is 89.7%, which places it near the upper end of the 80–89% scoring band. This indicates generally reliable delivery performance, though it remains slightly below the 90% threshold required for the top delivery-performance range.
Scoring Rationale
At 89.7%, delivery performance is close to strong but still technically below 90%. Based on the defined scoring standard, this falls within the 7–8 point range. Given that the figure is very close to 90%, the upper score within that band is appropriate.
Final Score
8 / 10
6. Quality & Customer Feedback
Basis
- Store rating: 4.5
- Review count: 30+
- Verified supplier: True
- Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
- Factory Verification: Verified supplier status provided, but detailed factory verification scope is Insufficient Data
Elaboration
The supplier has a 4.5 store rating and 30+ reviews, indicating generally positive but not extensive customer feedback. Verified supplier status provides some quality and operational credibility, but the available data does not confirm Finished Product Inspection, detailed inspection procedures, quality control workflow, test reports, or product compliance certificates. This creates a limitation for buyers with strict quality assurance requirements.
Scoring Rationale
The supplier has acceptable customer feedback and some platform-backed verification, but the quality assurance system is not fully evidenced in the supplied information. The lack of Finished Product Inspection data prevents a higher score. The rating and review count support a mid-level quality confidence score rather than a top-tier assessment.
Final Score
14 / 20
Total Score
78 / 100
Procurement Recommendation
Cooperation is recommended with moderate confidence for buyers sourcing mosquito repellent products with relatively low MOQ requirements and a preference for platform protection. The supplier is suitable for small-to-medium importers, promotional product buyers, private-label buyers requiring customization, and buyers who value Trade Assurance-backed transactions.
Key risks include limited disclosed factory scale, moderate review volume, store rating of 4.5 rather than a higher benchmark, and Insufficient Data regarding Finished Product Inspection, detailed factory audit scope, product compliance certificates, and formal quality control procedures. Before placing large-volume or regulated-market orders, buyers should request product test reports, inspection records, sample approval, packaging specifications, and pre-shipment inspection arrangements.
The supplier shows growth potential due to its 11-year Gold Supplier history, recent transaction activity, customization capability, and stable platform presence.
Leave your comment