Qingdao Scaffolding Import And Export Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Executive Summary
Qingdao Scaffolding Import And Export Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Shandong, offering slab formwork and related building material products. Based on the provided data, the company shows a moderate operational foundation, with a reported factory area of 8,200+ square meters, 60+ staff, and verified supplier status. Its strongest credibility factor is its 24-year Gold Supplier history, supported by platform labels such as Finished Product Inspection, ODM service availability, Full Customization, and Warranty available. However, Trade Assurance is not supported, and commercial performance data is largely missing, including six-month order volume, transaction value, store rating, and customer reviews. The supplier appears suitable for buyers seeking formwork products from an experienced platform-listed supplier with customization capability, but buyers should conduct additional due diligence before large-volume procurement due to limited transaction transparency and absence of customer feedback.
Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength
Basis
- Factory area: 8,200+ square meters
- Staff size: 60+ staff
- Verified supplier: True
- Location: Shandong, China
Elaboration
The supplier has a defined physical operating scale with more than 8,200 square meters of factory area and over 60 employees. This indicates a basic-to-medium production setup rather than a very large-scale industrial operation. The verified supplier status provides an additional layer of confidence that the company has passed some form of supplier verification on the platform.
Scoring Rationale
The company does not fall into the large-scale supplier category because the staff size and factory area suggest a moderate production base. However, the factory size is not negligible, and the presence of verified supplier status strengthens its credibility as an operational manufacturer or supplier. The data supports a score in the medium-stable range, but not at the top end due to limited evidence of large-scale production capacity or additional factory certifications.
Final Score
15 / 20
2. Platform & Compliance Credibility
Basis
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier duration: 24 years
- Trade Assurance: False
- Certification / industry labels: Warranty available, Finished product inspection, ODM service available, Full customization
- Verified supplier: True
Elaboration
The supplier has a long Gold Supplier history of 24 years, which is a significant platform credibility indicator. It also carries relevant service and quality-related labels, including Finished Product Inspection and Warranty available. ODM service and Full Customization further indicate platform-recognized service capability. However, the absence of Trade Assurance weakens buyer protection and transaction security.
Scoring Rationale
The long Gold Supplier history is a major strength and suggests long-term platform presence. Verified supplier status and multiple platform labels support credibility. However, because Trade Assurance is not available, the supplier does not meet the highest level of platform-backed transaction protection. Therefore, the score is strong but slightly below the top range.
Final Score
17 / 20
3. Business Performance
Basis
- Past 6-month order volume: Insufficient Data
- Past 6-month transaction value: Insufficient Data
- Store rating: Insufficient Data
- Number of reviews: 0
Elaboration
The provided data does not include recent order volume, recent transaction value, or store rating. The review count is 0, which means there is no visible customer feedback record in the supplied dataset. This creates a major limitation in assessing actual market validation, buyer satisfaction, and recent commercial activity.
Scoring Rationale
Because order volume, transaction value, and store rating are unavailable, the supplier’s business performance cannot be strongly validated. The lack of reviews further reduces confidence in recent buyer engagement. Although the company has strong platform history, business performance scoring must be based specifically on transaction and feedback data, which is insufficient here.
Final Score
6 / 20
4. Service Capability
Basis
- Communication response time: ≤6h
- Full Customization: Available
- ODM service: Available
Elaboration
The supplier reports a response time of within 6 hours, which indicates acceptable communication efficiency but not the fastest service level. The presence of Full Customization and ODM service labels suggests the supplier can support customized product requirements rather than only standard product sales.
Scoring Rationale
A response time of ≤6 hours is reasonable for B2B sourcing but does not meet the strongest benchmark of ≤1 hour. The customization-related labels improve the score because they indicate flexibility in product adaptation. Overall, the supplier demonstrates solid service capability, but not at the highest level due to response speed.
Final Score
8 / 10
5. Delivery Performance
Basis
- On-time delivery rate: 100.0%
Elaboration
The supplier’s reported on-time delivery rate is 100.0%, which is the strongest available delivery indicator in the provided data. This suggests that, based on the platform metric supplied, the company has met delivery commitments for recorded transactions.
Scoring Rationale
According to the scoring standard, an on-time delivery rate above 90% qualifies for 9–10 points. Since the provided rate is 100.0%, the supplier receives the maximum score for this dimension. However, this assessment is limited to the provided delivery percentage and does not include shipment volume or order count.
Final Score
10 / 10
6. Quality & Customer Feedback
Basis
- Store rating: Insufficient Data
- Number of reviews: 0
- Finished Product Inspection: Available
- Verified supplier: True
- Warranty available: Available
Elaboration
The supplier has several quality-related indicators, including Finished Product Inspection, Warranty available, and verified supplier status. These are positive signs for quality control and buyer protection at the process level. However, there is no store rating and no customer review record in the provided data, making it impossible to validate product quality through buyer feedback.
Scoring Rationale
The presence of Finished Product Inspection and Warranty available supports a basic quality assurance structure. Verified supplier status also contributes positively. However, the absence of customer reviews and store rating prevents a high score because customer satisfaction and market feedback are not demonstrated. The score therefore remains in the lower-middle range.
Final Score
12 / 20
Total Score
68 / 100
Procurement Recommendation
Cooperation is conditionally recommended for buyers seeking slab formwork and related building material products from a long-standing Gold Supplier with verified supplier status and customization capability.
The supplier appears most suitable for: - Buyers requiring slab formwork products with ODM or customization options - Buyers who value long platform history and supplier verification - Buyers placing trial orders before scaling to larger procurement volumes - Buyers able to conduct independent quality checks or pre-shipment inspection
Main risks: - Insufficient recent transaction data - No visible customer reviews - No provided store rating - Trade Assurance not supported - Limited evidence of large-scale production capacity beyond factory size and staff count
Growth potential is present due to the supplier’s 24-year Gold Supplier history, verified status, 100.0% on-time delivery rate, and customization labels. However, before high-value or long-term cooperation, buyers should request recent order references, quality inspection records, production capacity details, and sample validation.
Leave your comment